JUDGEMENT
A.K.SIKRI, J. -
(1.) All the petitioners who have filed these contempt petitions were
engaged by the State of Madhya Pradesh on different dates on different
posts but all of them were engaged as daily wagers. They continued as
daily wagers for long spell of time. According to the petitioners, in terms
of Madhya Pradesh Industrial Environment (Standing Order) Rules,
1963, they became entitled to be classified as 'permanent employees'. However, their demand for classification as permanent employees was
not acceded to by the State, which inaction of the State Government
provoked some of these employees to raise the industrial dispute for
their classification which resulted into award(s) of the labour court
directing their classification as 'permanent'. The labour court also held
that on their classification as permanent, they would be entitled to the
pay-scale of permanent post from dates specified in the award. Appeals
were filed by the State against those orders which were dismissed by the
industrial court and writ petitions also came to be dismissed by the High
Court. This resulted in passing of the orders by the concerned
authorities in the State Government classifying these petitioners as
permanent employees. It was also ordered that they shall be entitled to
minimum pay as fixed by the Labour Commission. This led to another
round of litigation as the petitioners claimed that on their classification as
'permanent' to their respective posts they were entitled to receive the
pay-scale attached to the said posts. These reliefs were granted to them
by the labour court against which appeal preferred before the industrial
court and the writ petition before the High Court were also dismissed. In
all these cases, thereafter, special leave petitions were filed which were
dismissed by this Court by common order dated 21 st January, 2015. This
order reads as under:
"Delay condoned.
Dismissed.
We direct the State Government to implement the order(s) passed by the High Court within eight months' time from today.
If for any reason, the petitioner-State does not implement the order(s) passed by the High Court, the respondents are at liberty to approach this Court by way of filing contempt petition(s)."
(2.) The State Government has passed the orders fixing the pay of these petitioners at the minimum of the regular pay-scale attached to the
respective posts. To demonstrate, by way of example, in the case of
Ram Naresh Rawat, who was engaged as a daily wager, the pay is fixed
at Rs. 15330/- in the pay-scale of Rs. 5200/- attached to the said post.
Break up of the aforesaid salary fixing is as under:
Sl. Particulars Amount (Rs.) No. 2(i) Minimum in the Regular 5200/- pay scale granted vide order dated 11.03.2016 (per month) 2(ii) Grade pay (per month) 1800/- 2(iii) D.A. (per month) 8330/- 2(iv) Total salary and other 15330/- benefits in hand (i+ii+iii) per month
At the time of passing the order, he was getting monthly wage of Rs. 11,300/- as the daily wager. His salary, therefore, stands enhanced of Rs. 4030/-. In addition, he is given arrears in the sum of Rs. 5,93,887/-. In similar manner, pay of all the petitioners has been fixed.
(3.) The petitioners are, however, not satisfied with the aforesaid fixation and contended that the pay fixation has not been done as per the orders of
this Court. The precise submission is that once they are conferred the
status of permanent employee by the court and it is also categorically
held that they are entitled to regular pay attached to the said post, not
only the pay should be fixed in the regular pay-scale, the petitioners
would also be entitled to the increments and other emoluments attached
to the said post. In other words, they pleaded that fixation of pay at the
minimum of the pay-scale is uncalled for and does not amount to
complying with the directions of the Court in full measure. It is also
submitted that in some other cases where the High Court has given
similar directions, which are followed in their cases, the State
Government has not only fixed pay in the regular pay-scale but has also
been granting increments etc. as well.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.