JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Review Petition (C) Nos.1445-1446 of 2016 In Civil Appeal Nos.13411-13412 Of 2015 and Review Petition (C) Nos.176-177 of 2016 In Civil Appeal
Nos.13413-13414 of 2015
We have heard the learned counsels for the contesting parties at
length. We have considered the entire materials on record. On such
consideration we are of the view that there is no error or infirmity in
the order dated 17th November, 2015 passed in Civil Appeal Nos.
13411-13412 of 2015 and Civil Appeal Nos. 13413-13414 of 2015 so as to justify review/recall of the said order in the exercise of the review
jurisdiction of this court. The Review Petitions are consequently
dismissed.
(2.) I.A. Nos.3-4/2016 In Civil Appeal Nos.13411-13412 of 2015: We have heard the learned counsels for the contesting parties. The
prayer for cancellation of the sale deeds (Exhibit DW2/2 and Exhibit
DW2/3) executed in favour of Ms. Sabina Jajodia has been specifically
prayed for in the suit filed by the applicant - appellant Ravinder Nath
Sahni as the plaintiff in addition to the relief for specific
performance. The said relief was granted by the learned trial Court but
reversed by the High Court in appeal. As we had set aside the order of
the High Court and decreed the suit of the plaintiff - Ravinder Nath
Sahni and dismissed the suit filed by Ms. Sabina Jajodia, as plaintiff,
for possession, we ought to have further decreed the suit of Ravinder
Nath Sahni for cancellation of the two sale deeds in question.
(3.) Accordingly, we modify our order dated 17th November, 2015 to decree the suit for specific performance filed by the applicant - appellant
Ravinder Nath Sahni and cancel the sale deeds (Exhibit DW2/2 and Exhibit
DW2/3) executed in favour of Ms. Sabina Jajodia. The jurisdictional
Sub-Registrar shall cancel the sale deeds (Exhibit DW2/2 and Exhibit
DW2/3) and shall make necessary entries in the relevant revenue records.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.