NAVJOT SINGH SIDHU Vs. OM PARKASH SONI & ORS.
LAWS(SC)-2016-10-45
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Decided on October 26,2016

NAVJOT SINGH SIDHU Appellant
VERSUS
Om Parkash Soni And Ors. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

RANJAN GOGOI,J - (1.) Leave granted.
(2.) The appellant before this Court is the returned candidate in the election held on 13th May, 2009 for the 02-Amritsar Parliamentary Constituency. The election was challenged in E.P. No.3 of 2009 before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. The appellant, as the respondent in the Election Petition, had filed an application under Order VI rule 16 and Order VII rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for dismissal of the election petition contending that on account of deficiencies in the pleadings no triable issue(s) is disclosed to justify a regular trial of the allegations made. According to the appellant the election petition, in its entirety, had failed to disclose any cause of action whatsoever. Though some relief (details of which need not be noticed) was granted to the appellant by the High Court, three broad categories of allegations contained in the election petition were held to disclose triable issues. Hence a regular trial of the same was ordered by the High Court by the order under challenge. Aggrieved, this appeal has been filed.
(3.) We have heard the learned counsels for the parties.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.