JUDGEMENT
PRAFULLA C.PANT,J. -
(1.) Leave granted.
(2.) This appeal is directed against order dated 16.09.2015, passed by the High Court of Judicature at Calcutta in GA No.
2998 of 2015 (in CS No. 2 of 2015), whereby said Court has rejected the application moved under Section 5 read with
Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to get
the dispute referred to arbitral tribunal.
(3.) Brief facts of the case are that appellant Greaves Cotton are manufacturers of, inter alia, diesel engines. Respondent
United Machinery and Appliances are manufacturers of diesel
generator sets. An agreement containing arbitration clause
was executed between them for supply of diesel engines by the
appellant to the respondent for using the same in the diesel
gensets. Arbitration clause contained in Article 10.1 of
agreement dated 02.07.2007 (copy Annexure P-1) reads as
under: -
"10.1 Any dispute or difference whatsoever arising between the parties out of or relating to the construction, meaning, scope, operation or effect of this Agreement or the validity or the breach thereof shall be referred to a Sole Arbitrator to be appointed by Greaves. The decision of the Arbitrator shall be final and binding upon the parties. The venue of arbitration shall be Mumbai. The arbitration proceedings shall, in all other aspects, be governed by the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 or any subsequent statutory enactment in place thereof."
The plaintiff-respondent filed civil suit (CS No. 2 of 2015)
seeking decree for an amount of Rs.4,92,76,854/- towards the
loss and damages suffered by it on account of alleged breach
of contract on the part of defendant-appellant. The High
Court, in its original side, issued summons in the suit on
06.01.2015 to the appellant. On the other hand, the appellant sent communication to the respondent claiming that it was the
respondent who has to pay outstanding dues of
Rs.1,04,53,103/- to the appellant. The appellant, in response
to the summons, on 07.07.2015 moved an application (copy
Annexure P-6) before the High Court seeking extension of time
for eight weeks to file written statement and invoked the
arbitration clause contained in the agreement dated
02.07.2007 by sending a letter dated 08.07.2015 (copy Annexure P-7) to the respondent, in response to which, vide
communication dated 13.07.2015 (copy Annexure P-7), it
denied the claim of the appellant, and objected to invocation of
arbitration clause on the ground of pendency of civil suit
before the High Court. Thereafter, the appellant moved
Application GA No. 2998 of 2015 (copy Annexure P-10) under
Section 5 read with Section 8 of the Arbitration and
Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short "the 1996 Act"), in the suit
seeking reference of the disputes between the parties forming
the subject-matter of the suit, for arbitration, which is rejected
by the High Court on the ground that the appellant has, by
moving application for extension of time to file written
statement, waived its right to seek arbitration. Hence, this
appeal through special leave.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.