JUDGEMENT
RANJAN GOGOI, J. -
(1.) The accused appellant has been convicted under Section 302 of the Indian
Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to
as "IPC") and sentenced to death. He has
additionally been convicted under Section
376 IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life. Besides, he has
been found guilty of the offences
punishable under Section 394 read with
Section 397 IPC as well as under Section
447 of the IPC for which he has been separately sentenced to undergo rigorous
imprisonment for seven years and three
months respectively. The conviction of
the accused appellant and the sentences
imposed have been confirmed in appeal by
the High Court. Aggrieved, the present
appeals have been filed.
(2.) The case of the prosecution in short is that the deceased/victim girl, aged
about 23 years, was working in Ernakulam
and was engaged to one Anoop (P.W.76), who
also happened to be employed in Ernakulam.
Their betrothal ceremony was to be in the
house of the deceased at Shornur on 2nd
February, 2011. P.W.76 along with his
family members were scheduled to visit the
house of the deceased on that day.
Accordingly, on 1st February, 2011 the
deceased boarded the Ernakulam -Shornur
Passenger Train at about 5.30 p.m. from
Ernakulam Town North Railway Station to go
to her home at Shornur. The deceased had
boarded the ladies division of the last
compartment. There were other passengers
in the ladies division of the compartment
along with the deceased. When the train
reached Mulloorkara, all other lady
passengers in the ladies division of the
compartment had alighted and, therefore,
the deceased also got down along with them
and hurriedly entered the ladies coach
attached just in front of the last
compartment. The train reached Vallathol
Nagar Railway Station, where it halted for
some time.
(3.) According to the prosecution, the accused appellant, who is a habitual
offender, noticed that the deceased was
alone in the ladies compartment. As soon
as the train had left Vallathol Nagar
Railway Station and moved towards Shornur
the accused entered the ladies
compartment. The prosecution alleges that
inside the compartment the accused had
assaulted the deceased and, in fact,
repeatedly hit her head on the walls of
the compartment. The prosecution has
further alleged that the deceased was
crying and screaming. It is the case of
the prosecution that the victim was
dropped/pushed by the accused from the
running train to the track and that the
side of her face hit on the crossover of
the railway line. The accused appellant
also jumped down from the other side of
the running train and after lifting the
victim to another place by the side of the
track he sexually assaulted her.
Thereafter he ransacked her belongings and
went away from the place with her mobile
phone.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.