JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The issue involved in these appeals, by special leave, is
identical and, therefore, they are being disposed of by a common
order. For the sake of convenience facts of Civil Appeal 8307 of
2002, which has been filed challenging the judgment and decree dated
14.6.2001 passed by Karnataka High Court in R.F.A. No. 406 of
2001, shall be stated.
(2.) The respondent K.S. Narayan filed Original Suit No. 5371 of
1989 in the court of City Civil Judge, Bangalore, praying that a decree
for permanent injunction be passed against the defendant Bangalore
Development Authority, their agents and servants restraining them
from interfering with the plaintiff's possession and enjoyment of the
plaint scheduled property and from demolishing any structure situate
thereon. The case of the plaintiff in brief is as follows. The plaintiff
purchased the property in dispute bearing No. 46, situated in
Banasawadi village, K.R. Pura Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk from S.
Narayana Gowda by means of a registered sale deed dated 17.6.1985.
The erstwhile owners of the property had obtained conversion
certificate from the Tehsildar and the property is situated in a lay out
which is properly approved by obtaining conversion for non-agricultural use from the competent authority. The plaintiff applied
for mutation entries and the same was granted in his favour. The
property in dispute was not covered by any acquisition proceedings as
neither notice of acquisition had been received nor any award
regarding the said property had been passed. The defendant had no
right, title or interest over the property but it was trying to dispossess
the plaintiff from the same on the ground of alleged acquisition. The
plaintiff issued a notice to the defendant on 11.7.1989 calling upon it
not to interfere with his possession and enjoyment of the property in
dispute but no reply had been received. It was pleaded that the cause
of action to file the suit arose on 11.7.1989, the date of the notice and
also when the defendant tried to dispossess the plaintiff from the
disputed property.
(3.) xx xx xx;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.