WORKMEN OF BHURKUNDA COLLIERY OF CENTRAL COALFIELDS LTD Vs. MANAGEMENT OF BHURKUNDA COLLIERY OF CENTRAL COALFIELDS LTD
LAWS(SC)-2006-1-48
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: JHARKHAND)
Decided on January 27,2006

WORKMEN OF BHURKUNDA COLLIERY OF M/S. CENTRAL COALFIELDS LTD.,MANAGEMENT OF BHURKUNDA COLLIERY OF M/S. CENTRAL COALFIELDS LTD., RANCHI Appellant
VERSUS
MANAGEMENT OF BHURKUNDA COLLIERY OF M/S. CENTRAL COALFIELDS LTD.,WORKMEN REPRESENTED BY THE GENERAL SECRETARY, KOYLA MAZDOOR SABHA, BHURKUNDA BAZAR, RANCHI Respondents





Cited Judgements :-

NARAYAN SINGH VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2006-7-114] [REFERRED TO]
D T C VS. SURAJ BHAN [LAWS(DLH)-2010-2-145] [REFERRED TO]
BALLARPUR INDUSTRIES LIMITED VS. MAHARASHTRA LOK KAMGAR SANGHATANA AND ORS. [LAWS(BOM)-2015-12-74] [REFERRED TO]
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES AND ORS. VS. RAJ KUMAR KANAUJIA AND ORS. [LAWS(ALL)-2011-4-478] [REFERRED TO]
DHAN RAJ AND ORS VS. STATE OF U P AND ORS [LAWS(ALL)-2011-8-373] [REFERRED]
S.SHANMUGAM VS. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND WATER SUPPLY DEPARTMENT [LAWS(MAD)-2019-6-98] [REFERRED TO]
MRS. SEEMA BANSAL VS. UNIVERSITY OF DELHI [LAWS(DLH)-2017-3-234] [REFERRED TO]
U.P.S.R.T.C. VS. ROADWAYS KARAMCHARI SANYUKT PARISHAD [LAWS(ALL)-2013-5-270] [REFERRED TO]
K.G.SAMPATHKUMAR VS. GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU [LAWS(MAD)-2019-2-334] [REFERRED TO]
V.PALANIAPPAN VS. DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE CHEPAUK [LAWS(MAD)-2019-3-440] [REFERRED TO]
EMPLOYEES IN RELATION TO MANAGMENT OF MOONIDIH PROJECT OF B C C LTD VS. PRESIDING OFFICER CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL [LAWS(JHAR)-2006-4-35] [REFERRED TO]
SHYAM LAL VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2007-3-62] [REFERRED TO]
VINOD KUMAR & OTHERS VS. CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ALLAHABAD & OTHERS [LAWS(ALL)-2016-3-147] [REFERRED TO]
ISH RANI VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(DLH)-2017-3-154] [REFERRED TO]
DHARMENDRA PRASAD SINGH AND ORS. VS. THE CHAIRMAN, STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS. [LAWS(DLH)-2015-2-192] [REFERRED TO]
GENERAL MANAGER UTTARANCHAL JAL SANSTHAN VS. LAXMI DEVI [LAWS(SC)-2009-5-167] [REFERRED TO]
KAMLESH PATHAK VS. THE STATE OF M.P. AND ORS. [LAWS(MPH)-2015-7-41] [REFERRED TO]
C. RAJAMANI AND ORS. VS. CANARA BANK [LAWS(MAD)-2017-8-391] [REFERRED TO]
D.RANI VS. DISTRICT COLLECTOR [LAWS(MAD)-2019-3-524] [REFERRED TO]
SECRETARY STATE OF KARNATAKA VS. UMADEVI [LAWS(SC)-2006-4-73] [REFERRED TO]
DEEPAK JOSHI VS. ASSTT. GENERAL MANAGER CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA [LAWS(ALL)-2023-7-28] [REFERRED TO]
KUMAR MAYANK VS. DELHI TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY & ANR [LAWS(DLH)-2016-11-11] [REFERRED TO]
CHANDRAPAL VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2011-1-141] [REFERRED TO]
K GANDHI VS. STATE OF TAMIL NADU [LAWS(MAD)-2017-8-440] [REFERRED TO]
CHAKRAVATI SINGH RATHORE VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [LAWS(RAJ)-2018-2-302] [REFERRED TO]
MOBINA KHATOON VS. STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, PATNA [LAWS(PAT)-2019-2-13] [REFERRED TO]
A SUDHAKAR VS. POST MASTER GENERAL HYDRABAD [LAWS(SC)-2006-3-88] [REFERRED TO]
VIPIN K.P VS. LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA [LAWS(KER)-2020-8-88] [REFERRED TO]
K.MURUGAN VS. GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU [LAWS(MAD)-2019-4-643] [REFERRED TO]
DUNCANS INDUSTRIES LTD. VS. STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. [LAWS(ALL)-2020-8-68] [REFERRED TO]
SUNDARI DEVI VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2009-11-95] [REFERRED TO]
SHONGTONG KARCHAM HYDEL PROJECT WORKERS UNION VS. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND OTHERS [LAWS(HPH)-2016-9-6] [REFERRED TO]
AMRATBHAI MOHANBHAI HARIJAN VS. DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPALITY [LAWS(GJH)-2012-11-65] [REFERRED TO]
P.MUTHU VS. GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU [LAWS(MAD)-2019-2-322] [REFERRED TO]
S.SHANMUGAM VS. ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY [LAWS(MAD)-2019-2-373] [REFERRED TO]
M.AROKIYA DOSS VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(MAD)-2019-3-335] [REFERRED TO]
WORKMEN REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY NAMELY SHEKHAR SHARMA VS. EMPLOYER IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF BHAGA BANDH COLLIERY [LAWS(JHAR)-2009-5-115] [REFERRED TO]
P A PERUMAL VS. GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT [LAWS(MAD)-2017-8-158] [REFERRED TO]
RAM PYARE VS. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL [LAWS(DLH)-2007-12-26] [REFERRED TO]
RAJ KAPOOR VS. ALLAHABAD BANK KOLKATA THROU ITS CHAIRMAN AND M.D. [LAWS(ALL)-2017-9-30] [REFERRED TO]
VICE CHANCELLOR CHANDRA SHEKHAR AZAD KRISHI EVAM PRODYOGIKI VISHWAVIDYALAYA KANPUR VS. PRESIDING OFFICER INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL 3 U P KANPUR [LAWS(ALL)-2006-3-234] [REFERERD TO]
EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF CAPTIVE POWER PLANT OF M/S. CENTRAL COALFIELDS LIMITED AT KATHARA, P.O. KATHARA, DISTRICT VS. THEIR WORKMEN BEING REPRESENTED BY SHRI KESHAV SINGH YADAV, AREA SECRETARY, BIHAR COLLIERY KAMGAR UNION, KATHARA, P.O. KATHARA, DISTRICT BOKARO [LAWS(JHAR)-2016-9-102] [REFERRED TO]
G. ARASUKUMAR AND ORS. VS. STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS. [LAWS(MAD)-2015-7-22] [REFERRED TO]
N. VEERAPPAN VS. CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR [LAWS(MAD)-2013-9-31] [REFERRED TO]
C KASIAMMAL; C SIVA VS. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT ENVIRONMENT AND FOREST DEPARTMENT [LAWS(MAD)-2013-12-203] [REFERRED]
A.ANANDAN VS. STATE OF TAMIL NADU [LAWS(MAD)-2019-3-525] [REFERRED TO]
MOHAN SINGH SAMMAL AND ORS. VS. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ORS. [LAWS(UTN)-2017-11-4] [REFERRED TO]
RAGHAVENDRA DWIVEDI VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2007-2-238] [REFERRED TO]
MASAN ALI VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(ALL)-2007-11-127] [REFERRED TO]
HANUMAN PRASAD PANDEY AND 12 ORS VS. STATE OF U P THRU PRIN SECY AGRICULTURE EDU LUCKNOW & ORS [LAWS(ALL)-2019-5-235] [REFERRED TO]
RAJ KUMAR VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2018-4-318] [REFERRED TO]
T.K.ARIGOPAL VS. STATE OF TAMIL NADU [LAWS(MAD)-2019-2-333] [REFERRED TO]
SHARMILA DEVI SHARMA VS. DR. Y.S. PARMAR UNIVERSITY AND ANOTHER [LAWS(HPH)-2009-5-55] [REFERRED TO]
SACHIN SAHEBRAO PATIL VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(BOM)-2009-1-243] [REFERRED]
HILLFORD THANGKHIEW VS. STATE OF MEGHALAYA [LAWS(MEGH)-2020-3-8] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

Dalveer Bhandari, J. - (1.)The main concept of regularization of Indian Industrial jurisprudence is the subject-matter of adjudication in these Civil Appeals. We propose to dispose of both these appeals by this judgment.
(2.)Brief facts which are necessary to dispose of these appeals are recapitulated as under: In these appeals, the award given by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal has been upheld by the learned single Judge and appeals against the judgment of the learned single Judge have been dismissed by the Division Bench of the Jharkhand High Court.
(3.)125 workmen were in the employment of Bhurkunda Colliery in various capacities since before its take-over by the Central Coalfields Ltd. (for short CCL). After the take-over by the CCL, the concerned workmen were employed as Mazdoors in certain engineering projects and were known as Civil Engineering Workers. The concerned workmen claimed that such type of Civil Engineering Workers should be put on regular basis as casual labour and in course of time they should be regularized.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.