JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Leave granted.
(2.) Heard Mr.Arun Jaitley, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of
the appellant and Mr.R.Mohan and Mr.Mohan Parasaran, learned ASG
appearing on behalf of the respondents.
(3.) We have perused the order passed by the High Court dt.22.06.2006 in
Writ Petition No.994 of 2006 filed by M/s Aiges India Marketing Pvt.Ltd. against
Union of India and another. We are not, in this case, concerned with the merits
of the case put forward by the appellant or the respondents. We confine
ourselves only to the observations made by the High Court in its order
dt.22.06.2006 in para 11 and 12 against the appellant who was the advocate-on-
record for Union of India. The observations made by the High Court in para 11
and 12 of its order reads thus :-
"11. On 9th February, 2005, this Court simply adjourned the matter as
the counsel for the revenue sought time to file an affidavit in reply
of the Commissioner (Investigation). However, the Central
Government Advocate in his letter dated 11th February, 2005,
apart from making several incorrect statements quoted
hereinabove, he has falsely stated that the court has granted
interim relief in the matter. Today Mr.Rana, on instructions from
Dr.Kaushik fairly states that our order dated 9th Feb, 2005 was not
even annexed to the letter dated 11th February, 2005 as the same
was not available on 11th February, 2005. It is unfortunate that the
Central Government Advocate who is supposed to safeguard the
interest of the Revenue should represent to the officers of the
department that there is an interim order passed against the
Revenue when in fact there is none. The conduct of Central
Government Advocate is highly deplorable to say the least.
Similarly, even the conduct of Mr.M.G.Rao, in filing an affidavit is
totally contrary to the stand of the Customs Department set out in
the affidavit in reply filed by the Joint Commissioner of Customs.
12 Dr.T.C.Kaushik who is personally present before us today has
tendered unconditional apology and has filed an affidavit to that
effect in writing on 27th March, 2006. In these circumstances, we
leave it to the Revenue Secretary of the Central Government and
to the C.B.E.C., New Delhi to take appropriate action as they deem
fit against Dr.T.C.Kaushik and Mr.M.G. Rao.";
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.