JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Interpretation and application of the provisions of Sections 25 and 26
of the Official Trustees Act, 1913 (for short, 'the 1913 Act') as also Section
302 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for short, 'the Succession Act') falls
for consideration in this appeal, which arises out of a judgment and order
dated 21.12.1999 passed by a Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court in
APD/T No.16 of 1999 in Appeal No.474 of 1999.
(2.) The said judgment was rendered in the following fact situation :
One Peter Charles Earnest Paul also known as 'Peter Paul' was the
owner of a piece of land, measuring 3 bighas 17 kottahs 8 chittackas 21 sq.
ft. equivalent to 5408.93 sq. metre located on the junction of Park Street and
Midleton Row, Kolkata having wide frontage on both the roads. He
executed a registered deed of lease in favour of one Francis Daniel
Augustus Larmour (for short, 'Larmour') in respect of the said premises for
a period of 99 years with effect from 01.06.1919 to 31.05.2018. He executed
a Will on 16.06.1920 appointing the Official Trustee as its Executor and
Trustee in respect of the said property. Beneficiaries of the said Will were
his wife and sister. He died on 01.08.1920. A probate was obtained by the
Official Trustee on 07.10.1920. Larmour executed a registered deed of
assignment in favour of one Arathoon Stephen, Stephen Court Limited
(hereinafter referred to as 'the Company') was constituted and incorporated
under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1913 on or about 04.12.1923.
Arathoon Stephen, who was a shareholder and first Managing Director of
the said Company entered into an agreement for acquiring the leasehold
rights of Arathoon Stephen. Arathoon Stephen and the Company thereafter
agreed to purchase the leasehold rights of the said premises for the balance
unexpired period under the said lease on 10.12.1923. On the same day a
registered Debenture Trust Deed was executed by Arathoon Stephen and the
Company and the three Trustees referred to in the said Deed, stating that the
Company was entitled to the said property for all the residue of the term of
1919 lease. As far back as in 1924, the Company constructed a five-storied
building. It continued to pay the rent to the Official Trustee who had issued
rent receipts to it. Sister of Peter Paul, Mrs. Hemingway, died leaving
behind a Will in terms whereof the public trustee of the Public Trust of
London took over her estate and started receiving her share of income. On
10.10.1965, widow of Peter Paul died, whereafter half share of the income
of the trust property was remitted to the Public Trustee of the Public Trust,
London by the Official Trustee till 18.05.1993. Permission of the Reserve
Bank of India for the later period is said to be awaited.
(3.) The Company by a letter dated 09.02.1984 requested the Official
Trustee for extension of the period of lease for a further period of sixty
years to which the Official Trustee by a letter dated 20.03.1984 suggested
that it should apply to the High Court for obtaining grant of extension of the
said lease. An application was thereafter filed before the Calcutta High
Court by the said Company under Section 302 of the Succession Act read
with Section 26 of the 1913 Act. The said application was entertained. The
Official Trustee filed an affidavit in opposition wherein, inter alia, it was
stated :
"The Official Trustee as such Trustee can neither
consent nor object to grant by any lease or modification
of the terms and condition thereof. The Official Trustee,
however, in the ends of justice is duty bound to produce
all the facts and circumstances relating to the said
property before this Hon'ble Court. The Official Trustee
states and submits that the following proposal would be
beneficial to the Estate :
(a) Upon the lessee agreeing to enhance the
current monthly rent payable for the lease by at least
400% the head lease can be rectified by giving the lease
the option of renewal the lease on such terms and
condition as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper
after expiry of the head lease on May 31, 2018 by efflux
of time.
(b) Competent valuer would be appointed by
this Hon'ble Court at the expenses of the petitioner for
ascertaining the market value of the property. The
probable market value of the property as on June 1, 2018
should be estimated on the basis of the present trend of
increase in the value of land in Calcutta as well as the
rate of inflation and the amount of rent to be paid by the
lessee for the extended period would be determined on
the basis of the said valuation.";
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.