CHAIRMAN U P JAL NIGAM Vs. JASWANT SINGH
LAWS(SC)-2006-11-158
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: ALLAHABAD)
Decided on November 10,2006

CHAIRMAN, U.P. JAL NIGAM Appellant
VERSUS
JASWANT SINGH Respondents


Referred Judgements :-

KRISHENA KUMAR V. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ETC. ETC. [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. V. S.M. KOTRAYYA AND ORS. [REFERRED TO]
RUP DIAMONDS VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. C K DHARAGUPTA [REFERRED TO]
JAGDISHLAL VS. STATE OF HARYANA [REFERRED TO]
DAYAL SINGH VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
GOVERNMENT OF WEST BENGAL VS. TARUN K ROY [REFERRED TO]



Cited Judgements :-

CHAIRMAN, STATE BANK OF INDIA VS. M.J. JAMES [LAWS(SC)-2021-11-23] [REFERRED TO]
LOKENDRA SINGH RAJPUT VS. STATE OF M.P [LAWS(MPH)-2019-2-223] [REFERRED TO]
MANJOO LATA KUSHWAH VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [LAWS(MPH)-2022-10-5] [REFERRED TO]
UTTARANCHAL PEY JAL S V A N NIGAM VS. ARVIND GARG [LAWS(SC)-2010-1-56] [REFERRED TO]
BRIJ MOHAN DATTA VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [LAWS(P&H)-2024-2-43] [REFERRED TO]
BRIJ MOHAN DATTA VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [LAWS(P&H)-2024-2-43] [REFERRED TO]
M/S. SHOELINE VS. COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX & ORS. [LAWS(SC)-2017-8-75] [REFERRED TO]
KRISHAN KUMAR AND ORS. VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. [LAWS(P&H)-2014-11-128] [REFERRED TO]
UMED SINGH VS. THE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. [LAWS(P&H)-2014-12-144] [REFERRED TO]
BALAK RAM VS. THE COMMISSIONER-CUM-SECRETARY REHABILITATION, HARYANA AND ORS. [LAWS(P&H)-2015-1-144] [REFERRED TO]
POOJA RANI VS. STATE OF HARYANA [LAWS(P&H)-2015-1-359] [REFERRED TO]
JASWANT SINGH AND ORS. VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. [LAWS(P&H)-2015-5-451] [REFERRED TO]
RAJ KUMAR SEHGAL VS. PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AND LABOUR COURT AND ANOTHER [LAWS(P&H)-2016-10-56] [REFERRED TO]
NATHA SINGH VS. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS [LAWS(P&H)-2010-12-678] [REFERRED]
MOTA SINGH VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [LAWS(P&H)-2011-9-117] [REFERRED TO]
MOTA SINGH VS. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS [LAWS(P&H)-2010-8-586] [REFERRED]
HARBHAJAN SINGH BIR VS. PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LIMITED [LAWS(P&H)-2012-11-89] [REFERRED TO]
RAJEEV BHARDWAJ VS. STATE OF H P [LAWS(HPH)-2021-3-64] [REFERRED TO]
K. THANKARAJAN VS. MANAGING DIRECTOR, TRIVANDRUM REGIONAL CO [LAWS(KER)-2015-7-266] [REFERRED TO]
B. VIJAYALAKSHMI VS. THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR AND ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION (ESIC) [LAWS(MAD)-2014-12-214] [REFERRED TO]
PARAMJEET SINGH VS. SHIROMANI GURUDWARA PARBANDHAK COMMITTEE, AMRITSAR [LAWS(P&H)-2017-9-192] [REFERRED TO]
PREM NATH VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [LAWS(P&H)-2017-7-135] [REFERRED TO]
M A RAVIVARMA VS. SECRETARY TAMIL NADU PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION [LAWS(MAD)-2009-9-263] [REFERRED TO]
SRI DEVI GAS DISTRIBUTORS VS. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD [LAWS(MAD)-2011-11-93] [REFERRED TO]
KABITA JENA VS. RAJAT KUMAR MISHRA [LAWS(ORI)-2023-12-91] [REFERRED TO]
KARNATAKA STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION VS. STATE BANK OF INDIA [LAWS(KAR)-2011-1-22] [REFERRED TO]
P. NAGA JASMINE VS. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH [LAWS(APH)-2022-7-15] [REFERRED TO]
DURGA KAUR VS. STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD [LAWS(JHAR)-2020-12-61] [REFERRED TO]
CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR VS. VENUGOPALAN [LAWS(KAR)-2010-3-29] [REFERRED TO]
BARODA RAYON CORPORATION LTD. VS. SHANTILAL PRABHUBHAI PATEL [LAWS(GJH)-2016-8-64] [REFERRED TO]
SHIV CHARAN VS. HIGH COURT OF DELHI [LAWS(DLH)-2008-5-192] [REFERRED TO]
SACHIN BALCHAND GAIDHANE VS. SHAILESH DAVDUJI GABHANE [LAWS(BOM)-2023-8-190] [REFERRED TO]
INSPECTOR RAJENDRA SINGH VS. UOI [LAWS(DLH)-2017-3-132] [REFERRED TO]
RAM MILAN DUBEY S/O LATE K.N. DUBEY VS. STATE OF U.P. THROUGH SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND ORS. [LAWS(ALL)-2011-11-439] [REFERRED TO]
SHIKHA ARORA VS. DSSSB [LAWS(DLH)-2011-1-198] [REFERRED TO]
TARIT KANTI NASKAR VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS [LAWS(CAL)-2017-8-128] [REFERRED TO]
IQBAL CHAND VS. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI [LAWS(DLH)-2013-1-337] [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. HARI NATH YADAV [LAWS(ALL)-2008-1-80] [REFERRED TO]
SRIKANTA MOHAN MISHRA VS. STATE OF ORISSA [LAWS(ORI)-2009-7-54] [REFERRED TO]
RAMKUMAR SINGH VS. STATE OF M.P. [LAWS(MPH)-2019-2-144] [REFERRED TO]
SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA VS. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER AND ANOTHER [LAWS(MPH)-2019-2-11] [REFERRED TO]
RAJESH BHADORIYA VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(MPH)-2019-3-69] [REFERRED TO]
JAGDISH PRASAD SHRIVASTAVA VS. STATE OF M.P. [LAWS(MPH)-2019-4-164] [REFERRED TO]
M. BAISHYA VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(MPH)-2012-10-65] [REFERRED TO]
KRISHI UPAJ MANDI SAMITI VS. ASHOKA OIL INDUS [LAWS(RAJ)-2008-9-144] [REFERRED]
SANGEETA AGGARWAL VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [LAWS(P&H)-2022-6-137] [REFERRED TO]
SUN CITY PROJECT PVT LTD VS. JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY [LAWS(RAJ)-2021-5-66] [REFERRED TO]
CHEMECH LABORATORIES LTD, VS. APPELLANT ASSISTANT [LAWS(MAD)-2019-6-390] [REFERRED TO]
KRISHAN KUMAR AND ORS. VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. [LAWS(P&H)-2015-1-155] [REFERRED TO]
OM PARKASH VS. STATE OF HARYANA [LAWS(P&H)-2015-1-438] [REFERRED TO]
PARAS RAM VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. [LAWS(P&H)-2015-12-106] [REFERRED TO]
NATHU RAM SHARMA AND ORS. VS. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. [LAWS(P&H)-2015-3-263] [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA & ANR VS. OM PRAKASH VISHNOI [LAWS(RAJ)-2016-11-5] [REFERRED TO]
NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. B. D. SINGHAL [LAWS(SC)-2021-7-12] [REFERRED TO]
CHANDRABHAN SINGH RAJPUT VS. STATE OF M P [LAWS(MPH)-2010-4-104] [REFERRED TO]
ALFRED PONNUDASAN VS. THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU [LAWS(MAD)-2015-8-141] [REFERRED TO]
GURMUKH SINGH VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [LAWS(P&H)-2009-4-129] [REFERRED TO]
BIDYARANI AYEKPAM VS. STATE OF MANIPUR [LAWS(MANIP)-2022-1-7] [REFERRED TO]
BANSHANBOR THANGKHIEW VS. THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ORS. [LAWS(MEGH)-2015-7-2] [REFERRED TO]
LILADHAR PAPANAI VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(MEGH)-2017-8-2] [REFERRED TO]
CHUKKA SARATH BABU VS. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH [LAWS(APH)-2022-2-12] [REFERRED TO]
AJAY KUMAR DEY & ORS VS. KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS [LAWS(CAL)-2018-8-55] [REFERRED TO]
KAMALENDU HALDER VS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS [LAWS(CAL)-2019-2-125] [REFERRED TO]
REENA AND 4 ORS VS. STATE OF U P AND 3 ORS [LAWS(ALL)-2017-1-420] [REFERRED TO]
HAR PAL SINGH VS. STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF ADMINISTRATIVE [LAWS(ALL)-2017-7-50] [REFERRED TO]
DIN BANDHU RAM VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(ALL)-2019-12-435] [REFERRED TO]
RAMESH CHANDRA CHAUBEY VS. STATE OF U.P. [LAWS(ALL)-2019-7-510] [REFERRED TO]
RAMESH CHANDRA CHAUBEY VS. STATE OF U.P. [LAWS(ALL)-2019-7-510] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF GUJARAT VS. DEPUTY COLLECTOR [LAWS(GJH)-2018-4-16] [REFERRED TO]
KASHI NATH BOSE VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL [LAWS(CAL)-2010-12-2] [REFERRED TO]
ING VYSYA BANK LTD. VS. VIKRAM HINGORANI [LAWS(DLH)-2014-1-206] [REFERRED TO]
HIRA LAL VS. STATE OF U P AND OTHERS [LAWS(ALL)-2013-11-236] [REFERRED]
RAM CHARAN ALIAS RAJENDRA PASWAN VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(ALL)-2012-2-133] [REFERRED TO]
SURESH CHANDRA VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2014-7-235] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF WEST BENGAL VS. INDRAJIT PATI [LAWS(CAL)-2019-3-192] [REFERRED TO]
CHAIRMAN U P STATE BRIDGE CORPORATION LTD LKO & ANR VS. NAWAB SINGH & ORS [LAWS(ALL)-2018-5-32] [REFERRED TO]
ROMI SHARMA VS. HOTEL THE OBEROI THRU ITS G.M. [LAWS(DLH)-2013-2-97] [REFERRED TO]
INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD VS. SUSHILA KUMAR [LAWS(DLH)-2012-2-10] [REFERRED TO]
C S PATEL VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH [LAWS(CHH)-2011-2-16] [REFERRED TO]
ARUN KUMAR PATHAK VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH [LAWS(CHH)-2019-12-191] [REFERRED TO]
POORAN AND OTHERS VS. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS [LAWS(ALL)-2009-12-303] [REFERRED]
HARIBHAU NARAYAN CHIKANE VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(BOM)-2022-12-65] [REFERRED TO]
RABINDRA KUMAR MISHRA SON OF SHRI BHAGWAT DATT MISHRA VS. CHAIRMAN VANANCHAL GRAMIN BANK [LAWS(JHAR)-2017-5-112] [REFERRED TO]
RASAL SINGH VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(GAU)-2010-1-3] [REFERRED TO]
MAHENDRA NATH MUDOI & ORS. VS. STATE OF ASSAM & ORS. [LAWS(GAU)-2012-12-39] [REFERRED TO]
SURENDER SINGH VS. D S S S B [LAWS(DLH)-2008-11-15] [REFERRED TO]
AGNELO FERNANDES VS. GOA COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY [LAWS(BOM)-2011-4-198] [REFERRED TO]
HIMACHAL PRADESH STATE CO-OPERATIVE MARKETING & CONSUMERS FEDERATION LTD. VS. GURCHARAN SINGH AND ANOTHER [LAWS(HPH)-2016-5-71] [REFERRED TO]
GGSIP UNIVERSITY VS. DHRUV SINGHAL [LAWS(DLH)-2011-1-238] [REFERRED TO]
ENOCH VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(APH)-2007-7-112] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF WEST BENGAL VS. ASIT DAS [LAWS(CAL)-2023-7-85] [REFERRED TO]
JANAKI BALLAV MOHANTY VS. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVT., DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES [LAWS(ORI)-2023-7-1] [REFERRED TO]
K KATHIRVEL VS. PHOENIX ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY [LAWS(MAD)-2018-1-809] [REFERRED TO]
RAJEEV BHARDWAJ AND ORS. VS. STATE OF H.P AND ORS. [LAWS(HPH)-2020-3-104] [REFERRED TO]
DIPANKAR GOGOI VS. STATE OF ASSAM [LAWS(GAU)-2022-5-61] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF J&K VS. C N MALLA [LAWS(J&K)-2008-3-24] [REFERRED TO]
JANAL RAJ VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [LAWS(P&H)-2012-12-91] [REFERRED TO]
RAJESH SIDANA S/O BODH RAJ SIDANA AND ORS VS. LALA LAJPAT RAI MEMORIAL AYURVEDIC MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL AND ORS [LAWS(PUNCDRC)-2010-8-7] [REFERRED TO]
T. SANKARARAGHAVAN VS. TAMIL NADU ELECTRICITY BOARD [LAWS(MAD)-2019-7-117] [REFERRED TO]
GURBAX SINGH VS. STATE OF HARYANA ORS. [LAWS(P&H)-2015-2-380] [REFERRED TO]
RAJIV BHATIA & ANOTHER VS. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER [LAWS(P&H)-2017-11-201] [REFERRED TO]
ROHTASH KUMAR VS. STATE OF HARYANA [LAWS(P&H)-2024-3-35] [REFERRED TO]
BIHAR STATE CO OPERATIVE AND MARKETING UNION LTD VS. MAHESH PRASAD SHARMA [LAWS(PAT)-2011-4-54] [REFERRED TO]
ASHOK KUMAR SINHA VS. STATE OF BIHAR [LAWS(PAT)-2009-9-99] [REFERRED]
JAIPUR DEVLOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. LALA RAM [LAWS(RAJ)-2010-1-46] [REFERRED TO]
DIRECTOR PIRAMAL EDUCATION TRUST VS. RAJASTHAN NON GOVT EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS TRIBUNAL [LAWS(RAJ)-2011-4-16] [REFERRED TO]
NARESH SINGH VS. STATE OF M.P. [LAWS(MPH)-2020-1-249] [REFERRED TO]
SANJEEV GUPTA VS. STATE OF M.P. [LAWS(MPH)-2019-1-277] [REFERRED TO]
BHAGWAN DAS SAHU VS. STATE OF M.P. [LAWS(MPH)-2019-1-276] [REFERRED TO]
JAGDISH PRASAD BANSAL VS. STATE OF MP [LAWS(MPH)-2018-12-132] [REFERRED TO]
GURMEET RANI AND ANOTHER VS. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER [LAWS(P&H)-2016-7-133] [REFERRED TO]
BHAG SINGH VS. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH [LAWS(HPH)-2022-10-51] [REFERRED TO]
POWER FINANCE CORPORATION LTD VS. MAHESHWARI HYDEL POWER CORPORATION LTD AND ORS [LAWS(NCLT)-2017-6-219] [REFERRED TO]
MUDASIRA SALAM VS. STATE OF J&K AND OTHERS [LAWS(J&K)-2013-9-77] [REFERRED]
J. SHEIK PARITH VS. THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS [LAWS(MAD)-2020-8-332] [REFERRED TO]
SILSENG R MARAK AND OTHERS; RUDRASON CH SANGMA AND OTHERS; LOHINDRO MARAK AND OTHERS; BATHSENG R MARAK AND OTHERS VS. STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND OTHERS [LAWS(MEGH)-2016-5-16] [REFERRED]
UNION OF INDIA VS. N.MURUGESAN [LAWS(SC)-2021-10-27] [REFERRED TO]
BICHITRANANDA BEHERA VS. STATE OF ORISSA [LAWS(SC)-2023-10-25] [REFERRED TO]
GOPAL VS. M P ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION [LAWS(MPH)-2008-10-47] [REFERRED TO]
SUNITA DEVI AND ORS. VS. STATE OF RAJ. AND ORS. [LAWS(RAJ)-2015-4-33] [REFERRED TO]
T.YAKAIAH VS. STATE OF TELANGANA [LAWS(TLNG)-2021-11-72] [REFERRED TO]
PHOOLESHWARI PANDRE VS. HINDUSTAN COPPER LTD [LAWS(MPH)-2023-5-119] [REFERRED TO]
RAGHUVEER SINGH UPLABDHA AND ORS. VS. STATE OF M.P. AND ORS. [LAWS(MPH)-2015-9-98] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF ORISSA VS. ALL ORISSA LOWER SECONDARY TEACHERS ASSOCIATION [LAWS(ORI)-2011-12-49] [REFERRED TO]
JAGANDEEP SINGH AND ANOTHER VS. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS [LAWS(P&H)-2016-11-191] [REFERRED TO]
THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT AND ORS. VS. S. SARASWATHY [LAWS(MAD)-2016-3-115] [REFERRED TO]
A. RAMANATHAN VS. GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS. [LAWS(MAD)-2019-1-958] [REFERRED TO]
UMA SHANKAR SHARMA VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH [LAWS(CHH)-2009-5-6] [REFERRED TO]
LEELAMBAR SINGH GOND VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH & ORS. [LAWS(CHH)-2009-10-46] [REFERRED TO]
DULAL KUMAR GOGOI & OTHERS VS. STATE OF ASSAM & OTHERS [LAWS(GAU)-2015-1-76] [REFERRED TO]
D. SHANKARLAL SHARMA VS. HONRABLE MINING TRIBUNAL/REVISIONAL AUTHORITY [LAWS(APH)-2022-2-8] [REFERRED TO]
CHUNVAD PANDEY VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2008-8-252] [REFERRED TO]
RAM NARAIN SINGH VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2007-5-87] [REFERRED TO]
HAZARI LAL VS. FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER [LAWS(DLH)-2010-7-254] [REFERRED TO]
EASTERN COALFIELDS LIMITED VS. MAHABALI TECHNO ENGINEERS [LAWS(CAL)-2022-3-66] [REFERRED TO]
SURAJIT DAS VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL [LAWS(CAL)-2012-11-12] [REFERRED TO]
VACHASPATI DIXIT VS. STATE OF U.P. [LAWS(ALL)-2018-3-25] [REFERRED TO]
D.T.C. VS. KANWAR SINGH [LAWS(DLH)-2011-5-405] [REFERRED TO]
M KUMAR VS. GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU REP BY ITS SECRETARY RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT [LAWS(MAD)-2018-10-256] [REFERRED TO]
SADA NAND VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS [LAWS(P&H)-2014-11-260] [REFERRED]
MANGE RAM VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(P&H)-2014-7-240] [REFERRED TO]
KAMOD PRASAD SINHA VS. BIHAR STATE FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LTD., [LAWS(JHAR)-2010-2-148] [REFERRED TO]
ABUL HASHEM AND ORS. VS. STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ORS. [LAWS(MEGH)-2015-8-14] [REFERRED TO]
G P TYAGI AND OTHERS VS. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND OTHERS [LAWS(UTN)-2018-7-5] [REFERRED TO]
BAL KRISHAN VS. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS [LAWS(P&H)-2012-9-739] [REFERRED TO]
MAHAVIR VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(SC)-2017-9-79] [REFERRED TO]
INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. SHAILENDRA [LAWS(SC)-2018-2-88] [REFERRED TO]
SATYA PRIYA KUMAR SINHA AND ORS. VS. ANJANI KUMAR SINGH AND ORS. [LAWS(PAT)-2015-7-14] [REFERRED TO]
KERALA STATE BEVERAGES (MANUFACTURING AND MARKETING CORPORATION LIMITED VS. JAYAN JOHN [LAWS(KER)-2023-2-146] [REFERRED TO]
RAMANUJ SHARMA VS. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [LAWS(MPH)-2016-5-103] [REFERRED TO]
NADIA DISTT PRIMARY SCHOOL COUNCIL VS. SRISTIDHAR BISWAS [LAWS(SC)-2007-4-149] [REFERRED TO]
NAGENDRA LAL VS. STATE OF BIHAR [LAWS(PAT)-2010-2-65] [REFERRED TO]
SANTOSH KUMAR JANGELA VS. STATE OF M.P. [LAWS(MPH)-2023-6-100] [REFERRED TO]
MALAY KUMAR SEN VS. BIHAR STATE FOOD & CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LTD. [LAWS(JHAR)-2017-4-86] [REFERRED TO]
MONIMOY BAISHYA S/O SONESWAR BAISHYA VS. STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS [LAWS(GAU)-2018-9-26] [REFERRED TO]
DINESH VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(BOM)-2023-3-48] [REFERRED TO]
RAJESHWAR PRASAD SINGH VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2013-2-65] [REFERRED TO]
U.P. STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION VS. NARESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA AND OTHERS [LAWS(ALL)-2018-10-113] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF U P AND ORS VS. ASHOK KUMAR MISHRA AND ANOTHER [LAWS(ALL)-2016-7-163] [REFERRED]
ESSAR POWER M.P. LTD VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(DLH)-2019-4-309] [REFERRED TO]
SURAJIT DAS VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL [LAWS(CAL)-2012-9-113] [REFERRED TO]
BALAHARI BHOWMICK VS. STATE OF W.B. [LAWS(CAL)-2012-12-34] [REFERRED TO]
SK GUPTA VS. AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA [LAWS(DLH)-2012-12-212] [REFERRED TO]
TAFZIL AHMED VS. RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD AND ORS [LAWS(RAJ)-2007-10-133] [REFERRED]
NARENDRA SINGH VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS [LAWS(RAJ)-2008-10-64] [REFERRED]
S SHANMUGAM VS. REGISTRAR, REGISTRAR OF SOCITIES, CENTRAL CHENNAI, ROYAPETTAH; SUGUNA VILASA SABHA [LAWS(MAD)-2016-4-443] [REFERRED]
STATE FARM CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD & ANR VS. RAM CHARAN AND ORS [LAWS(RAJ)-2012-2-242] [REFERRED]
HARNAM SINGH VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [LAWS(P&H)-2014-3-166] [REFERRED TO]
SURESH KUMAR VS. STATE OF HARYANA [LAWS(P&H)-2015-1-372] [REFERRED TO]
RAMEEZ HASSAN RATHER VS. STATE OF J&K [LAWS(J&K)-2007-9-24] [REFERRED TO]
BIJOY S. S. VS. KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION [LAWS(KER)-2008-10-63] [REFERRED TO]
M A RAVIVARMA VS. SECRETARY, TAMIL NADU PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION [LAWS(MAD)-2009-9-496] [REFERRED]
KUSHAL KUMAR VS. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH [LAWS(HPH)-2022-10-82] [REFERRED TO]
BHAGWAN DASS PAHWA VS. SECRETARY-CUM-FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORT AND ORS [LAWS(P&H)-2010-5-443] [REFERRED]
ZAHID SNOBER VS. STATE OF J&K [LAWS(J&K)-2022-1-36] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF TAMIL NADU VS. SESHACHALAM [LAWS(SC)-2007-9-98] [REFERRED TO]
NARAYAN BATHAM VS. CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA [LAWS(MPH)-2019-3-147] [REFERRED TO]
TARSEM PAL VS. PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LIMITED AND ORS. [LAWS(P&H)-2012-11-158] [REFERRED TO]
PATNI COMPUTERS SYSTEMS LTD VS. MAHARASHTRA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION [LAWS(BOM)-2010-2-204] [REFERRED TO]
GHAMAND SINGH VS. COMMISSIONER, BASTAR DIVISION [LAWS(CHH)-2010-12-24] [REFERRED TO]
CHAIN SINGH PENDRE VS. STATE OF C.G [LAWS(CHH)-2009-3-29] [REFERRED TO]
STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LIMITED VS. LALIT AGRAWAL [LAWS(CHH)-2019-10-36] [REFERRED TO]
TULSI MAHTO VS. STATE OF JHARKHAND [LAWS(JHAR)-2020-12-12] [REFERRED TO]
BRAMH DEO LAL VS. DIVISIONAL GENERAL MANAGER EASTERN ZONE UPSRTC VARANASI [LAWS(ALL)-2009-4-153] [REFERRED TO]
ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA AND ORS. VS. STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. [LAWS(ALL)-2015-8-259] [REFERRED TO]
ABHIJIT SADHUKHAN VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL [LAWS(CAL)-2019-8-187] [REFERRED TO]
KAMLESH SINGH VS. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS [LAWS(ALL)-2011-12-367] [REFERRED TO]
G VARALAKSHMI VS. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT SOCIAL WELFARE [LAWS(APH)-2013-7-60] [REFERRED TO]
LAXMAN J. CHAVAN VS. STATE OF GOA [LAWS(BOM)-2020-2-104] [REFERRED TO]
TAPAN KUMAR DAS & ANR. VS. STATE OF ASSAM & ORS. [LAWS(GAU)-2013-3-26] [REFERRED TO]
SIVANANDAN VS. T.V.NAGARAJAN [LAWS(MAD)-2012-12-188] [REFERRED TO]
SARASWATHI NARAYANAN COLLEGE VS. GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU [LAWS(MAD)-2012-12-272] [REFERRED TO]
SMT. KAUSHALYA VS. STATE OF HARYANA & OTHERS [LAWS(P&H)-2017-7-242] [REFERRED TO]
LOUREMBAM DEBEN SINGH AND ORS. VS. THE STATE OF MANIPUR AND ORS. [LAWS(MANIP)-2015-10-5] [REFERRED TO]
JAYANTA KHAUND VS. ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED [LAWS(GAU)-2024-1-31] [REFERRED TO]
S.C.KAINTHLA VS. STATE OF H.P [LAWS(HPH)-2019-5-61] [REFERRED TO]
BHUSHAN LAL SHARMA VS. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH [LAWS(HPH)-2022-3-26] [REFERRED TO]
AHMED ALI VS. STATE FARM CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD [LAWS(RAJ)-2011-11-41] [REFERRED TO]
RAMDIN VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [LAWS(MPH)-2009-5-30] [REFERRED TO]
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI VS. SURENDER SINGH [LAWS(SC)-2019-8-3] [REFERRED TO]
INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. MANOHARLAL ETC. [LAWS(SC)-2020-3-83] [REFERRED TO]
CHHOTU RAM AND ORS. VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. [LAWS(RAJ)-2015-2-79] [REFERRED TO]
RAJBIR SINGH VS. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER [LAWS(P&H)-2017-11-200] [REFERRED TO]
JAIDEEP DHILLON VS. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS [LAWS(P&H)-2016-5-378] [REFERRED TO]
KAMLESH RANI VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [LAWS(P&H)-2017-10-12] [REFERRED TO]
KAILASH CHANDRA AGARWAL VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [LAWS(RAJ)-2022-1-147] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VS. DAYANAND CHAKRAWARTY [LAWS(SC)-2013-7-34] [REFERRED TO]
BHAROSILAL KUSHWAH VS. GWALIOR DEVELOPMENT [LAWS(MPH)-2019-7-189] [REFERRED TO]
CHAIRMAN UTTAR PRADESH JAL NIGAM VS. RADHEY SHYAM GAUTAM [LAWS(SC)-2007-3-103] [REFERRED TO]
MOHAN SINGH VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [LAWS(P&H)-2014-1-407] [REFERRED TO]
SURESH KUMAR VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. [LAWS(P&H)-2014-12-62] [REFERRED TO]
PHOOLA RAM VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. [LAWS(P&H)-2015-1-157] [REFERRED TO]
TEJINDER KAUR VS. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER [LAWS(P&H)-2016-10-47] [REFERRED TO]
HEMANT KATAKWAR VS. STATE ELECTION COMMISSION [LAWS(CHH)-2009-7-44] [REFERRED TO]
NARESH TIWARI VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH [LAWS(CHH)-2009-9-15] [REFERRED TO]
KOOPCHARAN DAS VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND OTHERS [LAWS(CHH)-2015-2-60] [REFERRED TO]
VAIDYA BALRAM ALIAS RAMBHAU KAKPURE VS. MAHARASHTRA UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCE NASIK [LAWS(BOM)-2010-3-141] [REFERRED TO]
RITESH RANJAN KUMAR VS. STATE OF JHARKHAND [LAWS(JHAR)-2020-1-51] [REFERRED TO]
RIVU DUTTA VS. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. [LAWS(CAL)-2015-9-60] [REFERRED TO]
TAPAN KUMAR MANDAL VS. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL [LAWS(CAL)-2014-11-22] [REFERRED TO]
DR. RITA WAHAL VS. CHANCELLOR, KING GEORGES MEDICAL UNIVERSITY, LUCKNOW & 3 ORS [LAWS(ALL)-2017-5-25] [REFERRED TO]
BILATUN NISHA VS. STATE OF U P AND 2 OTHERS [LAWS(ALL)-2017-12-327] [REFERRED TO]
DEV SHARMANAIK VS. INDO TIBETAN BORDER POLICE & ANR ORS [LAWS(DLH)-2019-1-403] [REFERRED TO]
KULDEEP KUMAR VS. DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD [LAWS(DLH)-2013-5-190] [REFERRED TO]
DINESH KUMAR SINGH VS. STATE OF U.P. [LAWS(ALL)-2009-7-176] [REFERRED TO]
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKET COMMITTEE VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(BOM)-2021-10-228] [REFERRED TO]
EASTERN COALFIELDS LTD. VS. SK. AMJAD MAJI [LAWS(CAL)-2020-2-27] [REFERRED TO]
P.V.NARAYANA VS. A.P.STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION [LAWS(APH)-2013-2-70] [REFERRED TO]
GYAMMAR TACHANG VS. STATE OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH [LAWS(GAU)-2013-11-46] [REFERRED TO]
SHRI ZILO ZO VS. STATE OF GOA THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY SECRETARIAT PANAJI GOA [LAWS(BOM)-2011-5-42] [REFERRED TO]
ITI LTD VS. VENUGOPALAN N [LAWS(KAR)-2010-3-116] [REFERRED TO]
MOTHER DAIRY VS. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF LABOUR & ORS. [LAWS(GJH)-2016-9-168] [REFERRED TO]
ARUN KUMAR SINGH, SON OF LATE RAJNATH SINGH VS. RAJENDRA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE [LAWS(JHAR)-2019-2-58] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF JHARKHAND VS. NARAYAN MAITY [LAWS(JHAR)-2021-8-66] [REFERRED TO]
RAKESH KUMAR VS. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI [LAWS(DLH)-2022-9-86] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF U P & ORS VS. CHANDRAMA RAMOLA [LAWS(UTN)-2017-5-48] [REFERRED TO]
GURDEEP SINGH & ANOTHER VS. SECRETARY EDUCATION PUNJAB & OTHERS [LAWS(P&H)-2013-7-648] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VS. ARVIND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA [LAWS(SC)-2014-10-29] [REFERRED TO]
RAMBHAROSI VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [LAWS(RAJ)-2019-5-458] [REFERRED TO]
SANJAY BROTHERS VS. URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST & ANR [LAWS(RAJ)-2015-7-360] [REFERRED]
RAJNI MALIK VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. [LAWS(P&H)-2015-1-294] [REFERRED TO]
KESAR SINGH VS. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. [LAWS(P&H)-2015-1-138] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(SC)-2011-9-7] [REFERRED TO]
HEMWATI VS. STATE OF M.P [LAWS(MPH)-2019-3-218] [REFERRED TO]
CHHAKKI LAL VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [LAWS(MPH)-2019-1-301] [REFERRED TO]
MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA VS. STATE OF M P AND OTHERS [LAWS(MPH)-2019-1-47] [REFERRED TO]
CHANDRAPAL SINGH SENGAR VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [LAWS(MPH)-2020-1-55] [REFERRED TO]
MUNNI BAI VS. STATE OF M.P. [LAWS(MPH)-2021-11-109] [REFERRED TO]
MANGAL AMUSEMENT P LTD VS. STATE OF M P [LAWS(MPH)-2011-5-38] [REFERRED TO]
HARISHANKAR TIWARI VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [LAWS(MPH)-2016-5-81] [REFERRED TO]
SRI MAHBIR PRASAD VS. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ORS. [LAWS(JHAR)-2010-1-181] [REFERRED TO]
TRAVELS STAR HOTELS (INDIA) LIMITED VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(P&H)-2009-7-55] [REFERRED TO]
SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT VS. A ESWARAMOORTHY [LAWS(MAD)-2010-12-16] [REFERRED TO]
S.G. DAVIS VS. STATE OF KERALA [LAWS(KER)-2020-2-324] [REFERRED TO]
S.G. DAVIS VS. STATE OF KERALA [LAWS(KER)-2020-2-324] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)Leave granted.
(2.)All this batch of appeals involve similar questions of law and fact, therefore, they are disposed of by this common order.
(3.)All these respondents are the employees of the Uttar Pradesh Jal Nigam (hereinafter to be referred to as 'the Nigam') and they were retired on attaining the age of superannuation at 58 years. Some of them filed writ petitions in the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad challenging the retirement of the employees of the Nigam on attaining the age of 58 years whereas the State Government employees were allowed to continue up to the age of 60 years and therefore, they should also be allowed to continue up to the age of 60 years. The writ petitions filed before the High Court failed and against that Civil Appeal No. 7840 of 2002 and batch of other appeals were filed before this Court. This Court disposed of the case of Harwindra Kumar along with other appeals and held that employees of Nigam are entitled to continue up to 60 years. This has been 2005 13 SCC 300. The operative portion of the said judgment reads as under :
" 10. For the foregoing reasons, we are of the view that so long as Regulation 31 of the Regulations is not amended, 60 years which is the age of superannuation of government servants employed under the State of Uttar Pradesh shall be applicable to the employees of the Nigam. However, it would be open to the Nigam with the previous approval of the State Government to make suitable amendment in Regulation 31 and alter the service conditions of employees of the Nigam, including their age of superannuation. It is needless to say that if it is so done, the same shall be prospective.

11. For the foregoing reasons, the appeals as well as writ petitions are allowed, orders passed by the High Court dismissing the writ petitions as well as those by the Nigam directing that the appellants of the civil appeals and the petitioners of the writ petitions would superannuate upon completion of the age of 58 years are set aside and it is directed that in case the employees have been allowed to continue up to the age of 60 years by virtue of some interim order, no recovery shall be made from them but in case, however, they have not been allowed to continue after completing the age of 58 years by virtue of erroneous decision taken by the Nigam for no fault of theirs, they would be entitled to payment of salary for the remaining period up to the age of 60 years which must be paid to them within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order by the Nigam. There shall be no order as to costs."



Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.