JUDGEMENT
Arijit Pasayat, J. -
(1.)Leave granted.
(2.)Appellant calls in question legality of the judgment rendered by a learned single Judge of the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench upholding the appellants conviction for offence punishable under Section 376(2)(e) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the IPC) as recorded by learned VI Additional Sessions Judge, Hardoi and the sentence of 10 years imprisonment was awarded.
(3.)We do not propose to mention name of the victim. Section 228-A IPC makes disclosure of identity of victim of certain offences punishable. Printing or publishing name or any matter which may make known the identity of any person against whom an offence under Section 376, 376-A, 376-B, 376-C or 376-D is alleged or found to have been committed can be punished. True it is, the restriction does not relate to printing or publication of judgment by High Court or Supreme Court. But keeping in view the social object of preventing social victimisation or ostracism of the victim of a sexual offence for which Section 228-A has been enacted, it would be appropriate that in the judgments, be it of this Court, High Court or lower Court, the name of the victim should not be indicated, we have chosen to describe her as victim in the judgment. The above position was highlighted in State of Karnataka vs. Puttaraja (2004) 1 SCC 475).
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.