YOGENDRA NARAYAN CHOWDHURY GOPAL CHAKRABORTY Vs. UNION OF INDIA
LAWS(SC)-1995-11-1
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Decided on November 30,1995

YOGENDRA NARAYAN CHOWDHURY,GOPAL CHAKRABORTY Appellant
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) In these appeals the only question is whether the appellants-motor pump attendants- are semi-skilled or skilled workers as determined in the Government circular dated May 11,1983. After the III Pay Commission, mazdoors working in the military engineering have been classified as unskilled and their scale of pay is Rs. 196-232, semi-skilled Rs. 200 to 290; skilled Rs. 260 to 400 and highly skilled grade II Rs. 330-480, highly skilled grade II Rs. 380-560. As a consequence of fitment, all the unskilled mazdoors, chowkidars who passed the test, were initially classified into skilled category and later it was discovered that it was a wrong classification. Consequently, directions were issued to fit them in the semi-skilled category and direction to recover the arrears paid during the period of 1984 to 1986 was also given. Some of the persons came to challenge these orders before different Benches of the central Administrative Tribunal. In the Cuttack Bench, the same categories of persons filed O. A. 382/87. The Tribunal held that they being unskilled, are to be classified as semi-skilled since they had passed the test and the semi-skilled is a feeder post to the skilled category namely, Rs. 260-400. Accordingly, while upholding the reversion, directed not to recover the arrears.
(2.) O. A. No. 796/87 was filed before the Administrative Tribunal, Calcutta Bench. In the first instance, the Bench had held that the reversion was bad and consequently directed restoration of their category into skilled category. When the matter was challenged by way of Special Leave Petition, that was dismissed in limine. In the meanwhile, another Bench of Calcutta Administrative Tribunal in the impugned order, following the Cuttack Bench, upheld the reversion but set aside the order of recovery of arrears. Thus these appeals by special leave.
(3.) Shri Nambiar, the learned senior counsel for the appellants contended that the appellants having passed the prescribed test became skilled and that, therefore, they were properly fitted into the grade of Rs. 260-400 in the year 1984 and their reversion to semi-skilled category i. e. Rs. 210-290 is illegal. He further contends that the decision of the first Bench of CAT, Calcutta is proper and this Court had put seal of approval and that therefore the view of the latter Bench and that of the Cuttack Bench are clearly illegal. We find no force in the contention.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.