COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX MADRAS Vs. RAJU AND MANNAR
LAWS(SC)-1965-12-32
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Decided on December 10,1965

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADRAS Appellant
VERSUS
RAJU AND MANNAR Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) The question raised in this appeal depends upon the construction of section 10(2)(vib) of the Indian Income-tax Act, the relevant portion of which reads: ". . . in respect of machinery or plant being new, which has been installed after the 31st day of March, 1954...."
(2.) In the context of similar facts, this court construed similar words found in section -10(2)(via) of the Act in Commissioner of Income-tax V/s. Mir Mohammad Ali. The relevant part of that Ss. reads: " in respect of depreciation of buildings newly erected, or of machinery or plant being new which has been installed, after the 31st day of March, 1948..."
(3.) Adverting to that clause, this court held in the case cited above that replacement of petrol engines in the buses by diesel engines earned the allowance within the meaning of the said clause. While the former provision gives allowance by development rebate, the latter provision gives it by way of depreciation allowance. But the condition that the machinery or plant should be new is common for both. Following the above Judgement we dismiss the appeal.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.