VOLTAS LTD. Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT
LAWS(SC)-2015-4-20
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: GUJARAT)
Decided on April 08,2015

VOLTAS LTD. Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF GUJARAT Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) The oft encountered debate on the extent of tax liability based on the classification of the determinants of a levy in law seeks judicial scrutiny in the attendant factual conspectus. The appellant being aggrieved by the determination made by the High Court of Gujarat on the issue common to a reference under Section 69 of the Sales Tax Act, 1969 (for short hereinafter referred as to as the "Act") being Sales Tax Reference No.1/2004 and its appeal, i.e. Special Civil Application No. 12508/2002, against it, seeks redress against the judgment and order dated 4.09.2006 to that effect.
(2.) We have heard the learned counsel for the parties.
(3.) The indispensable skeletal facts introduce the appellant, M/s. Voltas Ltd. as a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 engaged amongst others in the business of execution of jobs design, supply and installation of air-conditioning plants construed to be indivisible works contracts. It is a registered dealer under the Act. By a communication dated 22.10.1993 of M/s. Anupam Colours and Chemicals Industries, Bombay, an order was placed with it for water chilling plant at its factory at Vapi. The basic design parameters were enumerated in the work order as hereunder: "1.Tonnage of Refrigeration .. 11 TR 2. Final temperature or chilled .. 5 to 6C water to be made available for our process. 3.Quantity of chilled water .. 12,000 liters( 5 to 6 C) required for our liters" process in about 10 hours. Other specifications pertaining to the water chilling plant were advised to be in conformity with the assessee's offer, as referred to therein. The work order insisted on the requirement of chilled water to be used directly for its process of manufacturing pigments with the assertion that sufficient precautions be taken to ensure that chilled water at 5 to 6 degree centigrade is available for such process. The letter emphasized as well that the assessee would provide the customer with the lay-out details, foundation drawing and other necessary information required for the erection of the plant. The essential segments of the works contracts involved, as would be eventually relevant for the adjudicative exercise underway, were thus specified with distinct details in the work order.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.