JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) These Criminal Appeals are preferred by the complainant against
the Judgment of the High Court of Judicature of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad
by which the High Court has in exercise of powers under Section 482 of the
Code of Criminal Procedure (in short Cr.P.C.) quashed the proceedings in CC
No. 37 of 2008 on the file of the court of the Special Judge for Economic
Offences at Hyderabad insofar as the accused Nos. A4, A5, A6, A9 and A10
are concerned.
(2.) The complainant i.e. the appellant herein lodged a private
complaint in his capacity as a Promoter Director of Sri Satyanarayana Power
Private Ltd. - a company incorporated to generate biomass based power
project in the District of Warangal in the State of Andhra Pradesh
(hereinafter referred to as the 'Company'). The complaint was filed in
respect of the offences allegedly committed under Section 628 of the
Companies Act, 1956 (in short the 'Companies Act') and Sections 120B and
420 of the Indian Penal Code (in short the 'IPC'). This complaint was
filed in the Court of Special Judge for Economic Offences at Hyderabad.
(3.) The accused Nos. 1, 2 and 3 are Directors of the Company. The
accused no. 4 i.e. Energo Masch Power Engineering & Consulting Pvt. Ltd. is
another Company. The accused Nos. 5, 6, 7 & 8 are its Directors. Accused
No. 9 is the Manager of M/s Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency (in
short 'IREDA') a financing agency and is brother-in-law of A5 and A6, and
accused No. 10 is a private person, namely Mrs. Sudha Ramani who is said to
have been given a fictitious authorization in respect of a Bank account by
a resolution of the company.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.