- (1.) Heard Mr. Kapil Sibal, learned senior Counsel appearing for the Appellants, Mr. Arvind P. Datar learned senior Counsel appearing for Respondent No. 2/S.E.B.I., Mr. S.A. Haseeb, learned Counsel representing Mr. B.V. Balramdas, for C.B.I., and Ms. Niranjana Singh, learned Counsel representing Ms. Pinky Anand, learned ASG. for Union of India. The applicant/Respondent No. 2-SEBI prays for appropriate orders/directions for ensuring compliance of our order 12.3.2013 passed in C.A. No. 6572 of 2004. Pursuant to our orders in the said appeal, Central Bureau of Investigation (hereinafter referred to as the CBI) stated to have attached the cash deposits made by the Appellants in different banks in the value of Rs. 79,91,79,324.71 somewhere in the month of February, 2014. The additional affidavit filed by the Appellants discloses that the CBI has also attached the immovable properties which were part of the so-called Collective Investment Scheme promoted by the Appellants and an indicative list of 25 such properties have also been disclosed in the said additional affidavit.
(2.) While hearing learned Counsel for the respective parties it was felt that the implementation of our order dated 12.3.2013 in the Civil Appeal can be worked out by disposing of the immovable properties and the money collected from such disposal along with the cash deposits available in the Banks can be disbursed to the investors and thereby the judgment can be implemented. It was also suggested that as a large number of investors, numbering several thousands are existing and the properties are also large in number, it is preferable that the said exercise of disposal of the properties and disbursement will have to be entrusted to some Special Committee consisting of a retired Judge of the Supreme Court or the High Court to be assisted by a retired District Judge of his/her choice.
(3.) However, since the properties were attached by the CBI for the purpose of proceeding with the prosecution against the Appellants, as directed in our judgment dated 12.3.2013 passed in the Civil Appeal, the response of the CBI as to in what manner its interest can be protected for the purpose of proceeding with the prosecution while lifting the attachment made by the CBI. In that perspective, in our order dated 11.3.2015, we impleaded CBI also as a party Respondent to enable this Court to pass appropriate orders in this application in the presence of the CBI. Pursuant to the said order, Mr. B.V. Balram Das, learned Counsel, seeks to appear for CBI. We direct CBI to file its response taking into account the above course of action which this Court wants to adopt for the implementation of our judgment dated 12.3.2013.;