- (1.) Heard Mr. C. A. Sundaram, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner, and Mr. Mukul Rohtagi, learned Attorney General appearing for the State of Maharashtra along with Mr.Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, learned standing counsel for the State of Maharashtra.
(2.) To put the controversy at rest, we require the petitioner to file a reply before the 1st Respondent stating that whatever she had stated, has remotely nothing to do with the conduct of the Maharashtra State Legislative Assembly. The said reply shall be filed within a fortnight hence.
(3.) Needless to say, filing of such a reply is without prejudice to the contentions raised in the Writ Petition. The matter be listed for further hearing on 18.11.2015.;