RAJBALA & OTHERS Vs. STATE OF HARYANA & OTHERS
LAWS(SC)-2015-12-26
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: PUNJAB & HARYANA)
Decided on December 10,2015

Rajbala And Others Appellant
VERSUS
State Of Haryana And Others Respondents

JUDGEMENT

CHELAMESWAR, J. - (1.) The challenge is to the constitutionality of the Haryana Panchayati Raj (Amendment) Act, 2015 (Act 8 of 2015), hereinafter referred to as the ''IMPUGNED ACT ''.
(2.) Even prior to advent of the Constitution of India under the Government of India Act, 1935 certain local bodies with elected representatives were functioning. Such local bodies did not, however, have constitutional status. They owed their existence, constitution and functioning to statutes and had been subject to the overall control of provincial governments.
(3.) Article 40 of the Constitution mandates - ''40. Organisation of village panchayats - The State shall take steps to organize village panchayats and endow them with such powers and authority as may be necessary to enable them to function as units of self government. '' To effectuate such obligation of the State, Constitution authorised (even prior to the 73rd Amendment) State Legislatures under Article 246(3) read with Entry 5 of List II to make laws with respect to; ''5. Local government, that is to say, the constitution and powers of municipal corporations, improvement trusts, districts boards, mining settlement authorities and other local authorities for the purpose of local self -government or village administration. '' Laws have been made from time to time by State Legislatures establishing a three -tier Panchayat system by 1980 's. It was felt desirable that local bodies be given constitutional status and the basic norms regarding the establishment and administration of a three -tier Panchayati Raj institutions be provided under the Constitution. Hence, the 73rd Amendment of the Constitution by which Part IX was inserted with effect from 24.4.1993.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.