COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, MUMBAI-I Vs. SEIKO BRUSHWARE INDIA
LAWS(SC)-2015-9-22
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Decided on September 04,2015

Commissioner Of Customs, Mumbai -I Appellant
VERSUS
Seiko Brushware India Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) Despite service, nobody appears for the respondent.
(2.) We have heard Shri Arijit Prasad, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Revenue.
(3.) The issue in this appeal relates to the denial of the benefit of Exemption Notification No. 34/98-Cus. dated 13.06.1998 which reads as follows:- "In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 3A of Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975), the Central Government having regard to the maximum sales tax, local tax or any other charges for the time being leviable on the like goods on their sale or purchase in India, hereby specifies the rates of special additional duty as indicated in column (3) in table below in respect of goods, when imported into India, specified in corresponding entry in column(2) of the said table and falling within First Schedule to the said Customs Tariff Act:" Against the relevant entry 'Nil' rate has been specified for All goods falling under the said First Schedule which are imported for sale as such, other than by way of high sea sale and the importer at the time of importation or at the time of clearances of warehoused goods for home consumption under the provisions of Section 68 of the Customs Act, 1962 (no. 52 of 1962), as the case may, makes a specified declaration to that effect in the Bill of Entry in the manner specified below. Provided that rate specified therein shall not apply if the importer sells the said imported goods from a place located in an area where no tax is chargeable on sale or purchase of goods.";


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.