H P STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD Vs. SHIV K SHARMA
LAWS(SC)-2005-1-14
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: HIMACHAL PRADESH)
Decided on January 10,2005

H.P.STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD Appellant
VERSUS
SHIV K.SHARMA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Srikrishna, J. - (1.) The Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board, Shimla, challenges by this appeal the judgment of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissing its second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the CPC).
(2.) The appellant-Board purchased 10.10 bighas out of holding of one Rikhi Ram on 20-4-1978. The sale deed specifically mentioned that the present respondents 1-3 shall have access to their land from the land of the seller, Rikhi Ram. On 29th March, 1981 the State Government acquired an area of 41.06 bighas of land for the public purpose of construction of 60 KW sub-station at Barotiwala. The acquired land included the remaining land of Rikhi Ram from whom respondents 1 to 3 had purchased the land. After the acquisition of the land, the entire property acquired for the benefit of the appellant was fenced off by barbed wire. An electric sub-station and living quarters for the employees of the appellant were also constructed thereupon. It appears that the appellant blocked off the passage being used as access to the land of the respondent which passed through the residential quarters and prevented such access to the said respondents. Respondents 1 to 3 filed a suit before the Sub-Judge Nalagarh for a mandatory injunction ordering the appellant-Board to remove the barbed wire blocking access to their land and for a permanent injunction to restrain the appellant in any manner to obstruct the access to their land. The trial court dismissed the suit.
(3.) Respondents 1 to 3 carried an appeal before the Additional District Judge, Solan. The Additional District Judge raised the following points for determination: "1. Whether the suit of the plaintiffs is liable to be dismissed on account of non-proof of the map filed with the plaint, as held by the learned Trial Court 2. Whether the plaintiffs have the right by way of easement of necessity or as purchasers from Rikhi Ram to pass through the land of the defendants through the passage shown in the site plan ;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.