DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NEW DELHI DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. LILA D BHAGAT:SARDARI LAL AND THE STATE:R S BAJWA 2 THE STATE
LAWS(SC)-1974-11-24
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: DELHI)
Decided on November 19,1974

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Appellant
VERSUS
LILA D.BHAGAT,SARDARI LAL AND THE STATE,R.S.BAJWA ; THE STATE Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Untwalia, J. - (1.) These five Civil appeals and the two Criminal appeals have been heard together and are being disposed of by a common judgment as the points involved in them are identical.
(2.) The various respondents in these appeals were being prosecuted by the Delhi Development Authority - hereinafter called the Authority - constituted under the Delhi Development Act, 1957 -hereinafter referred to as Development Act, u/s 29 (2) of the said Act. Large number of such prosecutions were started against various persons owning land and buildings in the different areas of Delhi for the alleged violation of Section 14 of the Development Act Some of the persons prosecuted challenged the legality of the prosecution by filling Writ Petitions and some by filing Criminal Petitions for the quashing of the conviction or the prosecution One Writ Petition being Writ Petn.. No. 728 of 1970 was disposed of by a Division Bench of the Delhi High Court consisting of Hardy and Deshpande, JJ. by their judgment reported in the case of N. K. Vasuraj v. Delhi Development Authority. ILR (1971) 2 Delhi 21. The view take in that case was: ''It is contended that no prosecution could be filed before the zonal plans in respect of the zones in which the premises are situated come into force. But the reply is that S. -14 of the Act applies "after the coming into operation of any of the plans." Therefore, as the Master Plan has come into operation and the user is contrary to the Master Plan, the prosecutions are legal even though no zonal plans have yet been framed for these zones."
(3.) After the decision aforesaid a number of other Writ Petitions were filed. Five of these came up for hearing by a Full Bench of the Delhi High Court consisting of Andley, C. J., Tatachari and Shanker, JJ. The Bench has allowed the Writ applications and issued a writ of mandamus against the Authority from prosecuting the criminal prosecutions against the respondents which were pending before a Judicial Magistrate at Delhi. The Magistrate has also been restrained from proceeding with the cases. The five Civil appeals are directed from the judgment and order D/- 3-12-1973 of the Full Bench of the Delhi High Court.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.