SHEELA JAWARLAL NAGORI Vs. KANTILAL NATHMAL BALDOTA
LAWS(SC)-2014-3-35
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Decided on March 25,2014

Sheela Jawarlal Nagori Appellant
VERSUS
Kantilal Nathmal Baldota Respondents


Cited Judgements :-

MOTILAL MONDAL VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(CAL)-2022-12-24] [REFERRED TO]
SYED MOHAMMED ALI WARSI AND OTHERS VS. LAND ACQUISITION & REHABILITATION OFFICER [LAWS(MPH)-2017-12-15] [REFERRED TO]
JOURA BEGAM AND ORS. VS. STATE OF M.P. AND ORS. [LAWS(MPH)-2015-9-126] [REFERRED TO]
SHYAM LAL VS. MURTI DEVI [LAWS(DLH)-2015-5-263] [REFERRED TO]
GAUTAM RAJ BHANSALI VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [LAWS(RAJ)-2018-2-118] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)The question before us is whether a landlord can maintain a suit for eviction of his tenant even after an award has been passed in respect of the tenanted property under the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. In our opinion, the answer must be in the affirmative.
(2.)The petitioners in both special leave petitions are the tenants of the respondent landlord. For convenience we have taken the facts from SLP (C) No. 37456 of 2013, but note that the issue that arises in both the cases is the same and the hearing proceeded on this basis.
(3.)The landlord had instituted Civil Suit No. 433 of 2000 in the Court of the 5th Additional Small Cause Judge and Jt. Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pune for vacant possession of the 'suit property' being CTS Old 99-B Raviwar Peth, New 767 Budhwar Peth, Pune from the tenant. The contention of the landlord was that the suit property was open space let out to the tenants and that it was not protected by the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 (for short the Act). The Trial Court accepted the contention of the landlord and passed a decree on 28th June, 2005 directing the tenant to hand over vacant possession of the suit property.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.