UNION OF INDIA Vs. M/S. HINDUSTAN ZINC LTD.
LAWS(SC)-2014-5-9
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Decided on May 06,2014

UNION OF INDIA Appellant
VERSUS
M/S. Hindustan Zinc Ltd. Respondents


Referred Judgements :-

STERLITE INDUSTRIES INDIA LTD. V. CCE [REFERRED TO]
CCE V. GAS AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. [REFERRED TO]
SWADESHI POLYTEX LIMITED VS. COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE [REFERRED TO]
RALLIS INDIA LIMITED VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
BINANI ZINC LTD. VS. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, COCHIN [REFERRED TO]





JUDGEMENT

- (1.)All these appeals raise identical question of law, which has arisen in almost similar circumstances. In fact, the issue involved was decided by the High Court in a batch of Writ Petitions filed by M/s. Hindustan Zinc vide judgment dated 23.1.2007 against which SLP under Article 136 of the Constitution was filed in which leave has been granted. In other case, same issue is decided by the CESTAT against which statutory appeal is preferred. That is precisely the reason that all these appeals were bunched together and collectively heard.
(2.)At the outset, the controversy involved may be reflected by pointing out that the questions for consideration are as to the entitlement of the Respondents/ assessees to Modvat/ Cenvat Credit for the use of inputs in the manufacture of final products which are exempt or subject to nil rate of duty and the requirement of the assessee to maintain separate accounts with respect to inputs used in dutiable goods as well as exempted goods and the liability arising on the failure of the assessee to maintain such separate accounts. In Civil Appeal Nos. 8621- 8630 of 2010, we are concerned with sulphuric acid. In Civil Appeal No. 8631 of 2010, it is caustic soda flakes and trichloro ethylene. In Civil Appeal No. 2337 of 2011, the product is again sulphuric acid and in the case of Civil Appeal No. 5322 of 2010 and the other connected matter of M/s Rallis India Ltd, it is Phosphoryl A and Phosphoryl B. The issue is as to whether the Assessees (respondents) are entitled to Modvat/ Cenvat Credit on inputs used in the manufacture of the aforementioned exempted (or subject to NIL rate of duty) final products.
(3.)In all these appeals filed by the Revenue, it has taken the position with the common contention as to whether the Respondents are liable to pay 8% excise duty as an amount under Rule 57CC of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 or 57AD of the Central Excise Rules, 2000 or Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 (hereinafter referred to as 'Rules') on the value of by-product namely sulphuric acid which was cleared to fertilizer plants under exemption in terms of the bonds executed by the fertilizer plants.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.