M/S S.V.A. STEEL RE-ROLLING MILLS LTD. Vs. STATE OF KERALA
LAWS(SC)-2014-2-7
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: KERALA)
Decided on February 06,2014

M/S S.V.A. Steel Re-Rolling Mills Ltd. Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF KERALA Respondents





Cited Judgements :-

SHOBHA AGGARWAL VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(DLH)-2019-1-19] [REFERRED TO]
RAJADHANI RYTHU PARIRAKSHANA SAMITHI, VS. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH [LAWS(APH)-2022-3-24] [REFERRED TO]
COMBITIC GLOBAL CAPLET PVT LTD VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER [LAWS(P&H)-2019-4-4] [REFERRED TO]
PRAVEEN KUMBHAT AND ORS. VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. [LAWS(RAJ)-2015-12-36] [REFERRED TO]
M/S. EXOTIC GRANITES EXPORT, REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER VS. STATE OF TELANGANA, RE. BY ITS SECRETARY, IND. AND COM.(M [LAWS(APH)-2017-1-39] [REFERRED TO]
FULBAR ALI AND 18 ORS. VS. STATE OF ASSAM [LAWS(GAU)-2020-2-102] [REFERRED TO]
PRAFULLA KUMAR PRADHAN VS. STATE OF ODISHA & ORS. [LAWS(ORI)-2016-12-75] [REFERRED TO]
MAA SANTOSHI CONSTRUCTION VS. STATE OF ODISHA AND OTHERS [LAWS(ORI)-2018-7-22] [REFERRED TO]
GANGES MANUFACTURING CO. LTD. VS. EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION [LAWS(CAL)-2023-5-123] [REFERRED TO]
ADANI GAS LIMITED AND ORS. VS. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. [LAWS(RAJ)-2015-4-126] [REFERRED TO]
GOVERNMANT OF KERALA VS. WAVES ELECTRONICS (P) LTD. [LAWS(KER)-2022-7-222] [REFERRED TO]
SWAPNA HAZARIKA VS. STATE OF ASSAM [LAWS(GAU)-2019-3-112] [REFERRED TO]
BALWANT SINGH VS. STATE OF HARYANA [LAWS(P&H)-2017-11-38] [REFERRED TO]
MAWANA SUGARS LIMITED VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [LAWS(ALL)-2019-2-250] [REFERRED TO]
VACMET INDIA LTD. THRU. ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY & OTHERS VS. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS CHEIF SECY. CUM INFRASTRUCTURE [LAWS(ALL)-2018-3-454] [REFERRED TO]
GOVINDA PRASAD LADIA VS. WBHIDC LIMITED [LAWS(CAL)-2015-5-37] [REFERRED TO]
DEVI MULTIPLEX VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(SC)-2015-5-36] [REFERRED TO]
M/S. HEBE ISPAT AT RASHIDCHAK AGAMKUAN, DISTRICT PATNA THROUGH ITS PARTNER SRI ISHWAR PRASAD GOENKA SON OF LATE BHOLA RAM GOENKA R/O HIRA NAND SAH LANE, P.S. CHOWK, PATNA CITY, DISTRICT PATNA VS. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA [LAWS(PAT)-2016-8-123] [REFERRED TO]
KALPATARU POWER TRANSMISSION LTD VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN; RAJASTHAN RENEWABLE ENERGY CORPORATION LTD; RAJASTHAN STATE GANGANAGAR SUGAR MILLS LTD ; DY GENERAL MANAGER, RAJASTHAN STATE GANGANAGAR SUGAR MILLS LTD; STATE LEVEL EMPOWERED COMMITTEE [LAWS(RAJ)-2016-9-85] [REFERRED]
BAJAJ AUTO LTD VS. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI AND OTHERS [LAWS(UTN)-2017-3-26] [REFERRED TO]
KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LTD VS. RUBFILA INTERNATIONAL LIMITED [LAWS(SC)-2022-11-55] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)Being aggrieved by the common Judgment dated 24th February, 2005 delivered by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in W.P.(C) No.5795/2004, W.P.(C) No.5877/2004, W.P.(C) No.5984/2004 and O.P. No.9816/2001, the appellants, original petitioners before the High Court have approached this Court by way of these appeals.
(2.)The facts giving rise to the present appeals, in a nut-shell, are as under:
The appellants are businessmen having their manufacturing units in the State of Kerala and they are manufacturing different articles with the help of electricity, which is generated/supplied by the Kerala State Electricity Board (hereinafter referred to as 'the Board'). The respondent-Government was desirous of having industrial development in the State of Kerala and therefore, it had framed certain policies so as to encourage and invite businessmen for setting up their manufacturing units in the State of Kerala. Due to shortage of electricity supply in the State of Kerala, interested entrepreneurs were not inclined to set up their units in the State of Kerala. In view of the aforestated circumstances, the State Government had laid down a policy whereby it declared to give continuous electricity supply at a particular rate to certain new manufacturing units.

(3.)So as to put the aforestated policy in practice, the respondent-State had issued a Government Order dated 21st May, 1990 which read as under:
"Government have been considering the question of giving some incentives to new industries in the matter of power connection. Taking into consideration the announcements made by the Minister (Finance) in the current year's budget speech and after discussions with all concerned, Government are now pleased to issue the following orders in this context which will have effect from 1-4-1990.

1. Power connection will be given on completion of any project irrespective of whether a general power cut is in force or not.

2. New units commencing industrial production will be exempted from power cut for a period of 5 years from the date of commercial production.

3. Exemption from payment of electricity duty for a period of 5 years from the date of commencement of commercial production will be given to the new units.

4. In future the electricity duty will not be collected from the industries if they are eligible for exemption.

5. Service connection charges will not be levied if no extension is required or if the additional line to be provided is less than 500 meters in length."

The aforestated State Government Order had been adopted by the Board by its Order dated 19th June, 1990.



Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.