SIDHARTHA SARAWGI Vs. BOARD OF TRUSTEES FOR THE PORT OF KOLKATA
LAWS(SC)-2014-4-107
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Decided on April 16,2014

SIDHARTHA SARAWGI Appellant
VERSUS
BOARD OF TRUSTEES FOR THE PORT OF KOLKATA Respondents





Cited Judgements :-

ULTRATECH CEMENT LIMITED VS. ASSISTANT LABOUR COMMISSIONER [LAWS(GJH)-2024-3-95] [REFERRED TO]
M/S. ENKON PVT. LTD. VS. BHUBANESWAR SMART CITY LTD. AND OTHERS [LAWS(ORI)-2017-2-9] [REFERRED TO]
DEEPAK SHARMA S/O T D SHARMASAPAN KUMAR SINHA S/O LATE RAMNANDAN PRASAD SINHA APOORWA MISHRA S/O SURESH MISHRA SHARMA W/O M P SHARMA MALHOTRAVERMA VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION [LAWS(CHH)-2019-9-5] [REFERRED TO]
GIRIDHAR MADRAS VS. THE INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND ORS. [LAWS(KAR)-2019-8-337] [REFERRED TO]
MEHSANA DISTRICT MILK PRODUCERS UNION LTD VS. REGISTRAR COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES [LAWS(GJH)-2017-6-107] [REFERRED TO]
UDUPI KASARGODE TRANSMISSION LIMITED VS. EMMANUEL VINCENT [LAWS(KAR)-2023-7-1426] [REFERRED TO]
LALJI S/O. DHANJI PATEL AND ORS. VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR. [LAWS(BOM)-2017-8-335] [REFERRED TO]
FEDERATION OF INDIAN AIRLINES AND OTHERS VS. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION AND ANOTHER [LAWS(DLH)-2017-8-255] [REFERRED TO]
U. GOVINDARAJ VS. STATE OF TAMIL NADU [LAWS(MAD)-2014-7-102] [REFERRED TO]
DEVAS MULTIMEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED VS. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX [LAWS(KAR)-2019-9-127] [REFERRED TO]
GORAKHPUR TEXPARK PRIVATE LTD VS. STATE OF U P THRU PRINCIPAL SECRY , INDUSTRIAL DEVP & ORS [LAWS(ALL)-2018-7-11] [REFERRED TO]
MEHSANA DISTRICT COOPERATIVE MILK PRODUCERS UNION LIMITED VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2017-3-662] [REFERRED TO]
DINAKARAN VS. FISHERIES CO-OPREATIVE SOCIETIES [LAWS(KER)-2017-1-83] [REFERRED TO]
RAMPRASAD AND ORS. VS. CENTRAL VALUATION BOARD AND ORS. [LAWS(MPH)-2016-1-42] [REFERRED TO]
GEORGE A.E.PAUL VS. BHARATH DYNAMICS LIMITED [LAWS(APH)-2016-4-39] [REFERRED TO]
SMT. SALMA KHATOON VS. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS [LAWS(ALL)-2016-8-327] [REFERRED TO]
M/S GANESH GRAIN STORE VS. STATE OF U.P. [LAWS(ALL)-2020-1-76] [REFERRED TO]
NAVEEN KISHAN RICE MILL VS. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND [LAWS(UTN)-2018-9-4] [REFERRED TO]
NAINITAL BANK LTD VS. NAVEEN KISAN RICE MILL AND OTHERS [LAWS(UTN)-2019-1-18] [REFERRED TO]
NATHALAL MAGANLAL CHAUHAN VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2020-2-342] [REFERRED TO]
GANESH GRAIN STORE, RANIGANJ BAZAR BALLIA VS. STATE OF U.P. [LAWS(ALL)-2020-1-510] [REFERRED TO]
G P ISPAT PRIVATE LIMITED VS. AUTHORIZED OFFICER AND CHIEF MANAGER, STATE BANK O [LAWS(CHH)-2017-8-50] [REFERRED TO]
YELLAPPA VS. STATE [LAWS(KAR)-2019-5-92] [REFERRED TO]
INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION, TAMIL NADU VS. K.BASKARAN [LAWS(SC)-2020-6-13] [REFERRED TO]
AMAL CHANDRA DAS VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL [LAWS(CAL)-2024-5-59] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)Delegatus Non Potest Delegare: A delegate has no power to delegate, is a well-settled principle. Is there any exception and is there any distinction between delegation of legislative and non-legislative powers, are the moot issues arising for consideration in these cases.
(2.)Delegation is the act of making or commissioning a delegate. It generally means parting of powers by the person who grants the delegation and conferring of an authority to do things which otherwise that person would have to do himself. Delegation is defined in Black's Law Dictionary as "the act of entrusting another with authority by empowering another to act as an agent or representative". In P. Ramanatha Aiyar's, The Law Lexicon, "delegation is the act of making or commissioning a delegate. Delegation generally means parting of powers by the person who grants the delegation, but it also means conferring of an authority to do things which otherwise that person would have to do himself". Justice Mathew in Gwalior Rayon Silk Manufacturing (Wvg.) Co. Ltd. v. The Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax and Others, 1974 4 SCC 98 has succinctly discussed the concept of delegation. Paragraph 37 reads as follows:
"37. Delegation is not the complete handing over or transference of a power from one person or body of persons to another. Delegation may be defined as the entrusting, by a person or body of persons, of the exercise of a power residing in that person or body of persons, to another person or body of persons, with complete power of revocation or amendment remaining in the grantor or delegator. It is important to grasp the implications of this, for, much confusion of thought has unfortunately resulted from assuming that delegation involves or may involve, the complete abdication or abrogation of a power. This is precluded by the definition. Delegation often involves the granting of discretionary authority to another, but such authority is purely derivative. The ultimate power always remains in the delegator and is never renounced."

(3.)There is a subtle distinction between delegation of legislative powers and delegation of non-legislative/administrative powers. As far as delegation of power to legislate is concerned, the law is well-settled: the said power cannot be sub-delegated. The Legislature cannot delegate essential legislative functions which consist in the determination or choosing of the legislative policy and formally enacting that policy into a binding rule of conduct (Harishanker Bagla v. State of M. P., 1955 1 SCR 380, Agricultural Market Committee v. Shalimar Chemical Works Limited, 1997 5 SCC 516 ). Subordinate legislation which is generally in the realm of Rules and Regulations dealing with the procedure on implementation of plenary legislation is generally a task entrusted to a specified authority. Since the Legislature need not spend its time for working out the details on implementation of the law, it has thought it fit to entrust the said task to an agency. That agency cannot entrust such task to its subordinates; it would be a breach of the confidence reposed on the delegate.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.