ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE Vs. S.S. SHEOKAND
LAWS(SC)-2014-2-61
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: PUNJAB & HARYANA)
Decided on February 26,2014

ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE Appellant
VERSUS
S.S. Sheokand Respondents





Cited Judgements :-

UNION OF INDIA VS. P. K.CHOUDHURY [LAWS(GAU)-2016-10-21] [REFERRED TO]
RAMESH CHANDRA PANDEY VS. CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA [LAWS(ALL)-2023-8-168] [REFERRED TO]
BAL KISHAN VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(DLH)-2017-3-113] [REFERRED TO]
RADHEY SHYAM VS. BANK OF INDIA [LAWS(MPH)-2020-1-136] [REFERRED TO]
DINESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA VS. MANAGING DIRECTOR, BANK OF BAROD [LAWS(ALL)-2017-7-129] [REFERRED TO]
S. JAYAKUMAR VS. BANK OF BARODA [LAWS(KAR)-2021-7-76] [REFERRED TO]
N. CHAKHAI VS. STATE OF MIZORAM [LAWS(GAU)-2017-5-83] [REFERRED TO]
GAUTAM DHAR VS. STATE BANK OF INDIA [LAWS(MEGH)-2019-6-30] [REFERRED TO]
BISHAMBER DASS KAYAT VS. UNION BANK OF INDIA [LAWS(P&H)-2020-2-323] [REFERRED TO]
GAUTAM DHAR VS. STATE BANK OF INDIA [LAWS(MEGH)-2017-11-7] [REFERRED TO]
N CHAKHAI VS. STATE OF MIZORAM & 2 OTHERS [LAWS(GAU)-2018-5-53] [REFERRED TO]
STATE BANK OF INDIA VS. ANIL KUMAR MISHRA [LAWS(JHAR)-2016-6-28] [REFERRED TO]
MANOJ RAI VS. STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ORS. [LAWS(JHAR)-2014-11-69] [REFERRED TO]
N CHAKHAI VS. STATE OF MIZORAM [LAWS(GAU)-2016-5-127] [REFERRED]
LALREMPUII FANAI VS. STATE OF MIZORAM [LAWS(GAU)-2022-3-127] [REFERRED TO]
D.R. SINGH VS. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. [LAWS(ALL)-2015-9-177] [REFERRED TO]
S.P. BHANDARKAR VS. CANARA BANK [LAWS(KAR)-2022-5-38] [REFERRED TO]
CHAIRMAN CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES NORTH BLOCK VS. K. CHANDRIKA [LAWS(KAR)-2024-4-4] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF RAJASTHAN VS. DR. R. P. GAUR SON OF SHRI BASTI RAM GAUR [LAWS(RAJ)-2017-5-155] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)This Civil Appeal seeks to challenge the judgment and order dated 16.3.2004 rendered by a Division Bench of Punjab and Haryana High Court in Civil Writ Petition No.18847 of 2001, allowing the said Writ Petition filed by the respondent, a Senior Manager in the appellant-bank. That judgment and order quashed the disciplinary order passed by the appellant-bank reducing him in two stages in pay scale with cumulative effect and also directed that he be considered for further promotion. The facts leading to this appeal are this wise:-
(2.)The respondent at the relevant time was working as the Senior Manager in a branch of the appellant-bank at Narwana, Bahadurgarh. It was noticed by the bank that he had purchased third party cheques/drafts of huge amounts beyond the discretionary powers of lending. This was done without completing the pre-sanction formalities. The appellant-bank, therefore, served a show cause notice to the respondent on 26.2.1997 for committing these unauthorised acts. The respondent filed a detailed reply dated 12.4.1997. Therein the respondent admitted committing of the alleged acts. He, however, stated that this was done with the intention of increasing the profits of the bank. He also contended that the bank had not suffered any loss in these transactions.
(3.)The appellant-bank, thereafter, charge-sheeted the respondent on 1.12.1997 for two specific irregularities, they were as follows:-
"Charge No.1 Respondent had unauthorisedly purchased 3rd party cheques/drafts of huge amount aggregating to Rs.45.23 crores for a number of parties much beyond his discretionary powers of lending without completing pre-sanction formalities in violation of head office guidelines. Thus he violated Regulation 3(i) of Oriental Bank of Commerce Officer Employees (Conduct) Regulation, 1982.

Charge No.2 Respondent had released advance under the Prime Minister Rojgar Yojna, and unauthorisedly insisted such borrowers to provide collateral securities in the shape of immovable property and guarantee in violation of the above scheme."



Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.