NAIM Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
LAWS(SC)-2014-11-43
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: UTTARAKHAND)
Decided on November 21,2014

NAIM Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Respondents


Cited Judgements :-

RAM KISHORE DUBEY VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2015-4-1] [REFERRED TO]
KANTA MUDI & ORS VS. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL [LAWS(CAL)-2016-8-38] [REFERRED TO]
RISHI TANDAN VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2016-5-358] [REFERRED]
SK GOPAL @ MEHRUL VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL [LAWS(CAL)-2017-4-89] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)This appeal arises out of judgment and order dated 24.07.2012 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital allowing Government Appeal No.386 of 2003 and setting aside the order of acquittal passed by the District and Sessions Judge, Haridwar in Sessions Trial No.26 of 2000 insofar as the present appellants are concerned.
(2.)On 07.09.1999 at about 1.30 pm the complainant Mustafa submitted a written report in Police Station Bhagwanpur, Haridwar to the effect that in the intervening night between 6th and 7th September 1999 he along with his brother Behroj, nephew Wasim and father Ali Hassan were sleeping in the verandah and that in the night at about 1200 hrs. he woke up and saw one Sabbir armed with Palkati, his brother Kabir armed with pharsa and one Naim armed with lathi coming to the verandah. Naim allegedly asked where was Ali Hassan, whereupon Kabir stated that Ali Hassan was sleeping and exhorted that he be killed, after which Sabbir gave a blow by palkati on the neck of Ali Hassan while he was sleeping. Ali Hassan died instantaneously. Upon alarm being raised these three persons ran away and while running they were seen by Farid Akhtar and Taimur.
(3.)On the basis of the above report Case Crime No.147 of 1999 under Section 302/504 IPC was registered. During the investigation statements of the complainant and other witnesses were recorded. Sabbir, Naim and Kabir were arrested and their statements led to the recovery of palkati and other weapons. The post-mortem on the body of the deceased was conducted by Dr. O.P. Sharma. After completion of investigation Sabbir, Kabir and Naim were charged for having committed the offences under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC and under Section 504 IPC.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.