OM PRAKASH Vs. STATE OF HARYANA
LAWS(SC)-2014-4-42
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: PUNJAB & HARYANA)
Decided on April 16,2014

OM PRAKASH Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA Respondents





Cited Judgements :-

DURGESH KUMAR SONAR VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2014-10-52] [REFERRED TO]
MOHD ARIF @ CHAND VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2015-1-9] [REFERRED TO]
SHIVAJI KADAJI PAWAR VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(BOM)-2015-2-99] [REFERRED TO]
PADMAKAR AND ORS. VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(BOM)-2015-8-60] [REFERRED TO]
RAJESH TRIPATHI S/O NAND LAL TIWARI VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2014-10-226] [REFERRED TO]
NEEL KANTH VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2014-12-335] [REFERRED TO]
KAILASH VS. STATAE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2014-8-337] [REFERRED TO]
SATYAPAL VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2014-8-375] [REFERRED TO]
SHUKH DEV VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2014-8-400] [REFERRED TO]
SUHIL VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [LAWS(ALL)-2014-5-571] [REFERRED TO]
MOHINDER SINGH AND ORS. VS. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. [LAWS(P&H)-2015-10-5] [REFERRED TO]
HANEEF GULAM RASOOL MAKRANI AND ORS. VS. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. [LAWS(BOM)-2015-7-303] [REFERRED TO]
VALABHAI GHELABHAI BHARWAD VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2016-6-218] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF U P VS. SHATROHAN & ANOTHER [LAWS(ALL)-2016-8-214] [REFERRED]
NAND KUMAR VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH [LAWS(SC)-2014-10-50] [REFERRED TO]
VINOD KUMAR NEPALI VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [LAWS(P&H)-2014-8-587] [REFERRED]
ANIL KUMAR VS. STATE NCT OF DELHI [LAWS(DLH)-2016-11-94] [REFERRED TO]
AMIT RAI @ PALTU VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH [LAWS(CHH)-2017-5-38] [REFERRED TO]
KARIM @ ABDUL KARIMKAR VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY WILSON GARDEN POLICE STATION [LAWS(KAR)-2018-1-162] [REFERRED TO]
PARSHURAM AND ORS. VS. THE STATE OF M.P. [LAWS(MPH)-2018-3-133] [REFERRED TO]
GANGARAM AND OTHERS VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [LAWS(MPH)-2017-10-269] [REFERRED TO]
RAKESH AGARWAL VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2017-8-370] [REFERRED TO]
RAJ KUMAR @ MOGHLI AND ANOTHER VS. STATE OF HARYANA [LAWS(P&H)-2017-3-294] [REFERRED TO]
DASTAGIRSAB VS. STATE [LAWS(KAR)-2017-10-230] [REFERRED TO]
KRISHNARAO GANGRAO MASKE VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(BOM)-2020-1-71] [REFERRED TO]
RAMPAL YADAV AND ORS. VS. STATE OF U.P. [LAWS(ALL)-2019-4-449] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)The present appeals, by special leave, have been preferred against the common judgment and order dated 18.03.2005 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Criminal Appeal Nos. 78-DB & 146-DB of 1997 with Criminal Revision No. 219 of 1997 whereby the court has declined to interfere with the judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Hisar in Sessions Case No. 40 of 1993 for the offences under Sections 148 and 302 read with Section 149 of IPC and affirmed the sentences of imprisonment for life and payment of fine of Rs. 1000/- by each with the default clause under Section 302 read with Section 149 of IPC and rigorous imprisonment of two years under Section 148 IPC with the stipulation that both the sentences shall be concurrent.
(2.)Shorn of unnecessary details, the prosecution version is that on 28.06.1993 the informant, Satbir Singh, PW 3, along with his two brothers, namely, Mahinder Singh, PW 7 and Prabhu Dayal (deceased) had gone to Hisar to enroll themselves in the Border Security Force for which interviews were being held at Hisar. About 3.00 p.m. all of them returned from Hisar in a Machanised Cart (Pater Rehra) and alighted at the bus stand of their village, Sadalpur. At that time, the accused-appellants, namely, Man Singh, Radhey Sham, Bhal Singh, Ram Kanwar, Raja Ram, Mange Ram, Kirpa Ram and Prem Singh emerged from the rear of Kotha (chamber), located nearby, Het Ram armed with a gun and all others armed with lathis. All of them raised a lalkara with the intention to assault the informant and his two brothers, Mahinder Singh and Prabhu Dayal, as the later had earlier caused injuries to them. Forming an unlawful assembly, with the common object they inflicted injuries on Prabhu Dayal with their lathis and butt of the gun. Prabhu Dayal fell down on the road. Being scared, the informant and his brother Mahinder Singh ran away and stood near the wall of the water reservoir. Thereafter, Om Prakash came on a tractor bearing registration No. HR-20A-8022, ran over Prabhu Dayal and fled away from the scene of occurrence along with their weapons in the tractor. The informant and his brother Mahinder Singh went to see the condition of Prabhu Dayal who had sustained injuries on his arms, legs, waist and head and bleeding profusely. He was taken to the Government Hospital, Adampur in a Machanised Cart and first aid was given to him. During his examination by the medical officer he succumbed to his injuries at 5.50 p.m. and the hospital staff informed the nearby police station about his death. The Investigating Officer, Ronaski Ram, PW-8, recorded the statement of Satbir Singh, PW-3, and on that base registered an FIR No. 100/93 at 7.45 p.m. and the criminal law was set in motion.
(3.)In course of investigation, the investigating agency prepared the inquest report, got the post mortem conducted and collected the blood stained earth vide seizure memo Ext. PM. On 2.07.1993 the Investigating Officer arrested Man Singh, Radhey Shyam, Ram Kumar, Raja Ram and Om Prakash. All of them led to discovery of the weapons used in the alleged commission of crime. After completing the investigation charge-sheet was placedagainstthe aforementioned accused persons.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.