JUDGEMENT
-
(1.)Heard Mr. S.P. Singh, learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant and Mr. Ashok Kumar Sharma, learned counsel
appearing for the respondent.
(2.)It is submitted by Mr. Singh, learned senior counsel for the appellant that Ved Prakash, father of the deceased had submitted
an application on 24.8.1993 alleging, inter alia, that on that day
about 7.10 a.m. he and his wife had left for their duties and his
dauther Km. Bharti was left alone at the house and when he
came back from the college, he found his daughter hanging from
the roof. He reported to the police by way of application and it
was treated as an FIR. Elaborating the submissions, it is urged
by him that on 26.8.1993 Ved Prakash coming to know certain
aspects from one Vinod Sharma, PW-2, about the involvement of
Manoj Kumar, the appellant herein, who had come out from the
room of Ved Prakash, submitted another report on 26.8.1993 to
the Station House Officer, Police Station, Mangalore, giving the
details about the fact that was disclosed to him by PW-2. In this
backdrop, it is put forth by learned counsel for the appellant that
there are two FIRs in respect of the same transaction and,
therefore, the investigation having carried on the base of the
second FIR, the trial is totally vitiated. Learned counsel for the
appellant has referred to certain authorities which we shall advert
to a later stage.
(3.)Mr. Ashok Kumar Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the State, submitted that it was not a second FIR and, in any
case, it would not vitiate the trial. It is his submission that it will
come within the spectrum of investigation and when the accused
has gone through the whole gamut of trial, he is not entitled to
put forth such a submission on the ground that the trial is
vitiated. Learned counsel for the State would say that in any
event it can be a curable irregularity and not an illegality which
would make the trial null and void. It is put forth by him
assuming investigation is carried on, on the basis of a 2 nd FIR,
the matter should be left for the trial and it should be tested on
the touchstone of prejudiced.
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.