ABP PVT. LTD. Vs. UNION OF INDIA
LAWS(SC)-2014-2-6
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Decided on February 07,2014

Abp Pvt. Ltd. Appellant
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA Respondents





Cited Judgements :-

THE NEW INDIAN EXPRESS VS. STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. [LAWS(KER)-2015-2-100] [REFERRED TO]
PRADHAN PRABANDHANK /UNIT HEAD M/S AMAR UJALA VS. STATE OF U P AND 3 OTHERS [LAWS(ALL)-2018-5-606] [REFERRED TO]
NAVBHARAT PRESS KARMACHARI KALYAN SANGH VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND ORS. [LAWS(CHH)-2015-11-9] [REFERRED TO]
JAGRAN PRAKASHAN LIMITED VS. AMAR KUMAR SINGH [LAWS(ALL)-2023-4-31] [REFERRED TO]
NAI DUNIA VS. HEMLAL SAHU [LAWS(CHH)-2024-5-21] [REFERRED TO]
REHANA KAUSAR VS. UT OF J&K [LAWS(J&K)-2022-12-21] [REFERRED TO]
STATESMAN LIMITED VS. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI [LAWS(DLH)-2019-11-105] [REFERRED TO]
GENERAL SECRETARY NEW INDIAN EXPRESS EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION VS. NEW INDIAN EXPRESS [LAWS(KER)-2014-9-14] [REFERRED TO]
INDIAN EXPRESS PVT. LTD. VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(ALL)-2024-4-48] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

P.SATHASIVAM, J. - (1.)THESE writ petitions, under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, have been filed by the petitioners (management of various newspapers) praying for a declaration that the Working Journalists and Other Newspaper Employees (Conditions of Service) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1955 (in short 'the Act') is ultra vires as it infringes the fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 19(1)(a) and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India. The petitioners further prayed for quashing of the notification dated 11.11.2011 issued by the Central Government accepting the recommendations made by Justice Majithia Wage Boards for Working Journalists and Non - Journalist Newspaper and News Agency Employees. Factual Background:
(2.)IT is pertinent to give a vivid background of the case before we advent to decide the issue at hand. Way back in 1955, the Government of India enacted the impugned Act to regulate the conditions of service of Working Journalists and in 1974 via amendment for other Newspaper Employees employed in newspaper establishments. For the purpose of fixing or revising the rates of wages of employees in newspaper establishments, the Central Government is empowered under Sections 9 and 13C of the Act to constitute two Wage Boards, viz., one for the working journalists and other for non -journalist newspaper employees respectively. Likewise, the Act also specifies that the Central Government shall, as and when necessary, constitute these Wage Boards. The composition of the Wage Boards is specified, as mentioned below: -
(a) Three persons representing employers in relation to Newspaper Establishments; (b) Three persons representing working journalists for Wage Board under Section 9 and three persons representing non - journalist Newspaper Employees for Wage Board under Section 13C of the Act; (c) Four independent persons, one of whom shall be a person who is, or has been a Judge of the High Court or the Supreme Court, and who shall be appointed by the Government as the Chairman thereof.

It is relevant to note that since 1955, six Wage Boards have been constituted for working journalists and four Wage Boards for non -journalist newspaper employees in order to fix or revise the rates of wages. The relevant details of the preceding Wage Boards are as under: - JUDGEMENT_76_TLPRE0_2014.jpg JUDGEMENT_76_TLPRE0_20141.jpg JUDGEMENT_76_TLPRE0_20142.jpg

(3.)THE Government constituted two Boards on 24.05.2007, one for the Working Journalists and the other for Non -Journalist Newspaper Employees under Sections 9 and 13C of the Act under the Chairmanship of Dr. Justice Narayana Kurup. The Chairman and six of the remaining nine members were common to both the Wage Boards. The remaining three members each representing the Working Journalists and Non - Journalist Newspaper Employees had been nominated by their respective Unions. The Wage Boards were given three years' duration to submit their Reports to the Central Government.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.