KRISHNA KUMAR RASTOGI Vs. SUMITRA DEVI
LAWS(SC)-2014-8-36
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: ALLAHABAD)
Decided on August 20,2014

Krishna Kumar Rastogi Appellant
VERSUS
SUMITRA DEVI Respondents





Cited Judgements :-

SUNIL ABROL VS. USHA SETHI AND ORS. [LAWS(DLH)-2015-12-239] [REFERRED TO]
SHAMSHAD HUSSAIN VS. AMRISH KUMAR [LAWS(ALL)-2016-2-228] [REFERRED TO]
M/S. INDIAN SCIENTIFIC GLASS INDUSTRIES VS. M.K. MAHIPALSINGH [LAWS(BOM)-2018-1-99] [REFERRED TO]
MINABALA DAS VS. PARESH CHANDRA DAS [LAWS(GAU)-2018-6-148] [REFERRED TO]
PRAHLAD TAMOLI VS. RAJESH KUMAR AGRAWAL [LAWS(ALL)-2015-5-172] [REFERRED TO]
AMIT KUMAR VS. PUTTAN BABU AND ORS. [LAWS(ALL)-2015-9-166] [REFERRED TO]
SHARDA DEVI VS. BHAGWATI PRASAD DALMION [LAWS(RAJ)-2022-8-62] [REFERRED TO]
CHITTARANJAN BORA VS. ROMONI KUMAR BHATTACHARYYA [LAWS(GAU)-2017-12-22] [REFERRED TO]
INDIAN SCIENTIFIC GLASS INDUSTRIES VS. M K MAHIPALSINGH INDIAN INHABITANT HAVING HIS ADDRESS C/O CRICKET CLUB OF INDIA, CHURCHGATE [LAWS(BOM)-2018-1-233] [REFERRED TO]
KALYAN RATANCHAND SHAH VS. M/S. SHESHMAL DHIRAJI, A FIRM BY ITS PROP.GHEVARCHAND KAPURCHAND JAIN (DECEASED) [LAWS(BOM)-2021-5-28] [REFERRED TO]
RAM KUMAR SINGH VS. NAND KISHORE NIGAM [LAWS(ALL)-2015-5-173] [REFERRED TO]
SANJAY MANOHARLAL MISTRI VS. NAWAPUR EDUCATION SOCIETY [LAWS(BOM)-2024-8-11] [REFERRED TO]
BIBEKANANDA SARMAH VS. GOBINDRAM BAWRI AND ORS. [LAWS(GAU)-2015-8-51] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)Leave granted.
(2.)These appeals are directed against the judgment and order dated 12th October, 2006 passed by the High Court of judicature at Allahabad in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.34997 of 2000 whereby the writ petition filed by the landlord has been dismissed, and the order dated 13th February, 2012 passed on Review Application No.225618 of 2006, whereby the said application has also been rejected.
(3.)Brief facts of the case are that the present appellant (landlord) filed an application under Section 21(1)(a) of Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred as U.P. Act No.13 of 1972) against the respondent Sumitra Devi (tenant) for release of the shop in question situated in Shivaji Market (Chhota Bazar), Shyohara, District Bijnor, before the Prescribed Authority/Addl. Civil Judge(Senior Division), Nagina. It is pleaded on behalf of the appellant that the respondent was tenant of the appellant in the shop on rent @ Rs.125/- per month. The appellant further pleaded that he needed the shop in question to establish his son Amit Kumar in the business by opening a General Merchant Shop in it. It is also alleged by the appellant that vide notice dated 11th March, 1985, the appellant asked the respondent to vacate the premises occupied by her as the same was required by the landlord/appellant as above, and since the respondent did not vacate the shop, the application for release of the shop was moved by the appellant before the Prescribed Authority/Addl. Civil Judge (S.D.), Nagina.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.