DURYODHAN ROUT Vs. STATE OF ORISSA
LAWS(SC)-2014-7-2
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: ORISSA)
Decided on July 01,2014

Duryodhan Rout Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF ORISSA Respondents





Cited Judgements :-

MAHESHA VS. STATE [LAWS(KAR)-2021-7-223] [REFERRED TO]
DULAL AND ORS. VS. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL [LAWS(CAL)-2015-7-79] [REFERRED TO]
ZIAUL HAQUE VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL [LAWS(CAL)-2023-8-110] [REFERRED TO]
SH. LALTHAKIMA S/O SUAKTHUAMA (L) VS. STATE OF MIZORAM [LAWS(GAU)-2018-7-157] [REFERRED TO]
TELUGU BANJIGARA THAMMAIAH VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [LAWS(KAR)-2021-1-103] [REFERRED TO]
SURESH CHAND VS. AJIT SINGH DAHIYA [LAWS(P&H)-2021-12-101] [REFERRED TO]
VISWANATHAN @ VISWAN VS. STATE OF KERALA [LAWS(KER)-2019-6-142] [REFERRED TO]
M.H.FAISAL VS. STATE OF KERALA [LAWS(KER)-2022-5-8] [REFERRED TO]
MUNILAL SHARMA VS. STATE OF BIHAR [LAWS(PAT)-2022-7-4] [REFERRED TO]
MAHESH RAI VS. STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI [LAWS(DLH)-2019-5-109] [REFERRED TO]
DEEPAK GUPTA VS. STATE OF ORISSA [LAWS(ORI)-2019-8-1] [REFERRED TO]
TONY @ THOMAS VS. STATE OF KERALA [LAWS(KER)-2022-10-309] [REFERRED TO]
SEESH PAL VS. STATE [LAWS(DLH)-2017-11-346] [REFERRED TO]
JITENDRA VS. STATE OF U.P. [LAWS(ALL)-2022-4-194] [REFERRED TO]
PHOOL SINGH VS. STATE OF U.P. [LAWS(ALL)-2022-4-145] [REFERRED TO]
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA VS. VITTHAL TUKARAM ATUGADE [LAWS(BOM)-2016-3-31] [REFERRED TO]
SABIR ALIAS SHABBIR VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [LAWS(RAJ)-2016-5-116] [REFERRED TO]
O.M. CHERIAN @ THANKACHAN VS. STATE OF KERALA [LAWS(SC)-2014-11-11] [REFERRED TO]
C.S.LALITHA VS. T.V.GOVINDARAJ [LAWS(KAR)-2021-9-293] [REFERRED TO]
MUTHURAMALINGAM AND ORS. VS. STATE [LAWS(SC)-2015-2-135] [REFERRED TO]
MUTHURAMALINGAM & ORS. VS. STATE REP. BY INSP. OF POLICE [LAWS(SC)-2016-7-42] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)These appeals are directed against the common judgment dated 8th January, 2008 passed by the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack in Death Reference Case No.2 of 2007 and J. Crl. A.No.12 of 2007. By the impugned judgment, the High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for the offence under Section 376, 302 and 201 IPC. However, taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the age of the appellant, his family background and the fact that the appellant had no criminal antecedent, the capital sentence for the offence under Section 302 IPC has been commuted to life imprisonment; and rest of sentence remain unaltered.
(2.)The case of the prosecution is that on 11th September, 2004, at about 3 p.m. accused Duryodhan Rout, on the pretext that the deceased, Subhasini, a minor girl aged about 10 years would talk over phone with his brother, Bamodev Bhoi took her on a bicycle. When the evening set in, the accused alone returned to the village and on enquiry about Subhasini, by Mulia Bhoi (PW-5), father of the deceased, he told that she had gone with a woman of Ranibandha to her house. On the next day, as she did not return Mulia Boi (PW-5) again questioned the accused regarding the where about of the deceased. The accused confessed in presence of Rabi Biswal (PW-3), Dasarathi Bhoi (PW-4) and Subashini Bhoi that he killed the deceased by pressing her neck. With the help of these three witnesses, Mulia Bhoi (PW- 5) took the accused to Thakurgarh P.S. got the FIR scribed by one Laxman Senapti and lodged it before Udit Narayan Pany, Officer-in-charge of the said Police Station. A P.S. Case No.51 dated 12th September, 2004 under Section 302/201 IPC was instituted. The accused was arrested, his statement was recorded under Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act on the basis of which he went to the spot made recovery of the dead body of the deceased, held inquest over it, seized the Chadi (underwear) of the victim lying near the spot, prepared seizure list in respect thereof and sent the dead body to Adhamalik Hospital for autopsy. He also seized the wearing apparels of the accused, forwarded to the Court on 13th December, 2004 and handed over charge of investigation of the case to the C.I. of Police. After completion of investigation, Investigating Officer (I.O.) submitted charge sheet against the accused under Sections 376/302/201 IPC.
(3.)Learned Session Judge secured the presence of the accused, framed charges u/s 376/302/201 I.P.C. The accused pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.