JUDGEMENT
-
(1.)Recognition of the right to adopt and to be adopted as a fundamental
right under Part-III of the Constitution is the vision scripted by the
public spirited individual who has moved this Court under Article 32 of the
Constitution. There is an alternative prayer requesting the Court to lay
down optional guidelines enabling adoption of children by persons
irrespective of religion, caste, creed etc. and further for a direction to
the respondent Union of India to enact an optional law the prime focus of
which is the child with considerations like religion etc. taking a hind
seat.
(2.)The aforesaid alternative prayer made in the writ petition appears to
have been substantially fructified by the march that has taken place in
this sphere of law, gently nudged by the judicial verdict in Lakshmi Kant Pandey Vs. Union of India, 1984 2 SCC 244 and the supplemental, if not consequential,
legislative innovations in the shape of the Juvenile Justice (Care And
Protection of Children) Act, 2000 as amended in 2006 (hereinafter for short
'the JJ Act, 2000) as also The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of
Children) Rules promulgated in the year 2007 (hereinafter for short 'the JJ
Rules, 2007').
(3.)The alternative prayer made in the writ petition may be conveniently
dealt with at the outset.
The decision of this Court in Lakshmi Kant Pandey is a high
watermark in the development of the law relating to adoption. Dealing
with inter-country adoptions, elaborate guidelines had been laid by this
Court to protect and further the interest of the child. A regulatory body,
i.e., Central Adoption Resource Agency (for short 'CARA') was recommended
for creation and accordingly set up by the Government of India in the year
1989. Since then, the said body has been playing a pivotal role, laying
down norms both substantive and procedural, in the matter of inter as well
as in country adoptions. The said norms have received statutory
recognition on being notified by the Central Govt. under Rule 33 (2) of the
Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Rules, 2007 and are
today in force throughout the country, having also been adopted and
notified by several states under the Rules framed by the states in exercise
of the Rule making power under Section 68 of the JJ Act, 2000.
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.