NANDLAL WASUDEO BADWAIK Vs. LATA NANDLAL BADWAIK
LAWS(SC)-2014-1-6
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Decided on January 06,2014

Nandlal Wasudeo Badwaik Appellant
VERSUS
Lata Nandlal Badwaik Respondents





Cited Judgements :-

MALAPPA @ MALINGARAYA VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [LAWS(KAR)-2021-12-7] [REFERRED TO]
NOONE MALLIKHARJUN VS. NOONE DEVI PRIYA [LAWS(APH)-2018-9-29] [REFERRED TO]
MR. AMIT KHETAWAT VS. STATE OF TELANGANA [LAWS(APH)-2017-2-63] [REFERRED TO]
RAJESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY VS. SARITA [LAWS(ALL)-2019-7-80] [REFERRED TO]
RENU SINGH VS. PRAMOD KUMAR SINGH [LAWS(ALL)-2017-8-56] [REFERRED TO]
KULDEEP VS. SUNITA DEVI [LAWS(HPH)-2016-4-192] [REFERRED TO]
NARINDER KUMAR VS. TEJ RAM AND ORS. [LAWS(HPH)-2015-8-89] [REFERRED TO]
SUSHIL MANDAL VS. STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR [LAWS(MAD)-2014-7-138] [REFERRED TO]
RAJARAM S/O BABURAO DHOTRE VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(BOM)-2018-8-192] [REFERRED TO]
DEEPALI SHRIMAAN PEDNEKAR VS. CAPTAIN PEDNEKAR SHRIMAAN DNYANESHWAR [LAWS(BOM)-2021-10-352] [REFERRED TO]
DILIP RAI VS. STATE OF BIHAR [LAWS(PAT)-2023-12-61] [REFERRED TO]
KIRAN KARKI @ CHETTRI UNCLE VS. STATE OF SIKKIM [LAWS(SIK)-2019-12-11] [REFERRED TO]
BIBLY MONICA VS. VIR VIKRAM KUMAR [LAWS(P&H)-2020-2-221] [REFERRED TO]
MANAS KUMAR KAR VS. SMT. BINAYA MISHRA [LAWS(ORI)-2020-1-14] [REFERRED TO]
NAVEETA VS. BHAGWAN SINGH [LAWS(HPH)-2019-6-6] [REFERRED TO]
MAHARAJAN VS. STATE [LAWS(MAD)-2020-11-227] [REFERRED TO]
RAJIV SINGH VS. STATE OF BIHAR [LAWS(PAT)-2014-5-20] [REFERRED TO]
DEV RAJ DEV VS. THE STATE OF BIHAR [LAWS(PAT)-2018-7-14] [REFERRED TO]
HANUMAPPA VS. YALLAKKA [LAWS(KAR)-2014-9-244] [REFERRED TO]
P S SHIVAKUMARKAR VS. P H SUBBARAYAPPA [LAWS(KAR)-2017-4-122] [REFERRED TO]
P.S. RADHAKRISHNAN VS. A. INDU [LAWS(KER)-2018-7-1056] [REFERRED TO]
NAVEEN KRISHNA BOTHIREDDY VS. STATE OF TELANGANA AND ANOTHER [LAWS(APH)-2017-2-9] [REFERRED TO]
SHANKAR VERMA VS. VIDYA VERMA [LAWS(CHH)-2022-7-89] [REFERRED TO]
ANIL PACHAURI VS. STATE OF U P AND ANOTHER [LAWS(ALL)-2015-11-233] [REFERRED]
DWARIKA HALBA VS. SAVITRI BAI [LAWS(CHH)-2014-8-12] [REFERRED TO]
ARVINDER SINGH VS. ANURADHA CHAUHAN [LAWS(HPH)-2016-9-184] [REFERRED]
SURESH VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(BOM)-2023-3-134] [REFERRED TO]
RANJAN KUMAR BEHERA @ NAIK VS. DOMBURUDHAR BEHERA AND OTHERS [LAWS(ORI)-2017-5-3] [REFERRED TO]
NOONE MALLIKHARJUN VS. NOONE DEVI PRIYA [LAWS(TLNG)-2018-9-17] [REFERRED TO]
SALIM AHMED S/O HABIBUL RAHMAN ANSARI VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(BOM)-2018-7-157] [REFERRED TO]
MOHIT PRAKASH BANJARE VS. XYZ [LAWS(CHH)-2024-4-29] [REFERRED TO]
RAVI KUMAR VS. REETA DEVI [LAWS(HPH)-2014-10-48] [REFERRED TO]
SARANYA VS. STATE BY INSPERCTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, PERAMBALUR AND DISTRICT. [LAWS(MAD)-2016-11-98] [REFERRED TO]
AFR MANAS KUMAR KAR VS. BINAYA MISHRA [LAWS(ORI)-2020-1-10] [REFERRED TO]
M/S. BHUWALKA STEEL INDUSTRIES LTD. & ANOTHER VS. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS [LAWS(SC)-2017-3-61] [REFERRED TO]
BADRI PRASAD JHARIA VS. VATSALYA JHARIA [LAWS(MPH)-2020-6-1002] [REFERRED TO]
SANTOSH MARKAM VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [LAWS(MPH)-2022-9-32] [REFERRED TO]
THAMARAI SELVI VS. GOVINDARAJ [LAWS(MAD)-2019-9-275] [REFERRED TO]
NAMDEO VS. SEEMA [LAWS(BOM)-2023-1-267] [REFERRED TO]
SAJI MATHEW VS. BINDU AND ORS. [LAWS(KER)-2015-12-109] [REFERRED TO]
BABU REMYALAYAM VEETTIL VS. VIDYA [LAWS(KER)-2014-11-245] [REFERRED TO]
BABU REMYALAYAM VEETTIL VS. VIDYA [LAWS(KER)-2014-11-245] [REFERRED TO]
HAMID ALI VS. AKARAM KHAN [LAWS(UTN)-2022-3-160] [REFERRED TO]
PRAKASH VS. KARPAGAM AND ORS. [LAWS(MAD)-2016-4-94] [REFERRED TO]
SENTHIL ANDAVAR VS. MUTHUMARI AND ORS. [LAWS(MAD)-2015-6-252] [REFERRED TO]
IN REFERENCE [RECEIVED FROM SPECIAL JUDGE, COURT OF PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT, DISTRICT SHAHDOL (M P )] VS. VINOD ALIAS RAHUL CHOUHTHA [LAWS(MPH)-2018-8-60] [REFERRED TO]
KALAIARASAN VS. STATE OF TAMILNADU, REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE [LAWS(MAD)-2018-7-304] [REFERRED TO]
G. VASANTHI VS. M. MUNEESHWARAN [LAWS(MAD)-2019-1-235] [REFERRED TO]
RAMESH BISHNOI VS. MAYA DEVI [LAWS(UTN)-2017-3-35] [REFERRED TO]
MANJEET KAUR VS. SUKHWINDER KAUR AND ORS. [LAWS(P&H)-2019-9-410] [REFERRED TO]
IN REFERENCE [RECEIVED FROM SPECIAL JUDGE, COURT OF PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT, DISTRICT SHAHDOL (M.P.)] VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH, P.S. KOTWALI, SHAHDOL (M.P.) [LAWS(MPH)-2018-8-221] [REFERRED TO]
DEEPAK SONI VS. ANAMIKA [LAWS(RAJ)-2023-5-179] [REFERRED TO]
MAHENDRA VS. MAMTA [LAWS(RAJ)-2019-5-3] [REFERRED TO]
ABDUL SALAM, S/O ABDURAHIMAN, AGED 50 YEARS, KADAKKOTTIRI VEEDU, KUMMINIPARAMBU, KONDOTTY VS. CHALIL SAJITHA, D/O AHAMMEDKUTTY, AGED 35 YEARS, THAZHATHETHODUVIL HOUSE, PULIYAPARAMBU P.O, KONDOTTY 673 638 [LAWS(KER)-2017-3-67] [REFERRED TO]
KALPANA W/O SAHEBRAO CHAVAN VS. SAHEBRAO DEVRAO CHAVAN [LAWS(BOM)-2016-9-221] [REFERRED TO]
SHAFIULLA SHARIFF @ SHAFI; TAJMUL AHMED SHARIFF @ TAJJU; SHAIK REHEEZ AHMED @ JAMAL VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [LAWS(KAR)-2014-11-388] [REFERRED]
RIYAZAHMED ABDULSATTAR NAGARCHI VS. SHIPA AND ORS. [LAWS(KAR)-2016-1-297] [REFERRED TO]
PARBATI CHINTADA VS. GOPAL KRISHNA CHINTADA [LAWS(ORI)-2019-3-37] [REFERRED TO]
RAJU YADAV VS. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI [LAWS(DLH)-2023-5-171] [REFERRED TO]
MASTER SANJEEV KUMAR VS. SH. KEHAR SINGH [LAWS(HPH)-2016-7-56] [REFERRED TO]
CHANDRAKANT JHA VS. STATE [LAWS(DLH)-2016-1-133] [REFERRED TO]
DIPANWITA ROY VS. RONOBROTO ROY [LAWS(SC)-2014-10-22] [REFERRED TO]
AFSAR @ AFSAR KHAN VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [LAWS(KAR)-2017-12-116] [REFERRED TO]
NIZAR VS. RASEENA [LAWS(KER)-2018-11-328] [REFERRED TO]
BANOTH KRISHNA VS. BANOTH VIMALA [LAWS(APH)-2014-9-57] [REFERRED TO]
NISHA MARIA SEBASTIAN VS. GERARD GIGI MICHAEL [LAWS(KER)-2023-3-169] [REFERRED TO]
DHEERAJ GADA VS. STATE OF M.P. AND ORS. [LAWS(MPH)-2015-8-116] [REFERRED TO]
BADRI PRASAD JHARIA VS. SEETA JHARIA [LAWS(MPH)-2017-4-34] [REFERRED TO]
ASHOK S/O BHAIRO SINGH PURVIYA VS. ASHOK [LAWS(MPH)-2017-5-218] [REFERRED TO]
RAGHBIR VS. BHARTO DEVI AND OTHERS [LAWS(P&H)-2017-1-105] [REFERRED TO]
HAWA SINGH AND OTHERS VS. MAIPERSON AND ANOTHER [LAWS(P&H)-2017-1-278] [REFERRED TO]
W VS. H & ANR [LAWS(DLH)-2016-8-50] [REFERRED TO]
SH. RAM GOPAL VS. SMT. VIDYA DEVI [LAWS(HPH)-2016-2-49] [REFERRED TO]
SHARDA VS. SURAT SINGH [LAWS(HPH)-2016-8-193] [REFERRED TO]
MADANAIAH DURGAM CHINNA KANDE VS. KANDE OMKAR KANDE [LAWS(BOM)-2023-3-165] [REFERRED TO]
SAHEBRAO VS. KALPANA [LAWS(BOM)-2021-2-135] [REFERRED TO]
PRAMOD PURUSHOTTAM SATHE VS. REKHA PRAMOD SATHE [LAWS(BOM)-2018-7-231] [REFERRED TO]
AUUP KUMAR MAITY VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL [LAWS(CAL)-2022-9-92] [REFERRED TO]
ANJANA BISWAS VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(GAU)-2022-9-129] [REFERRED TO]
USHABEN VASUDEV TADVI & 1 VS. STATE OF GUJARAT & 1 [LAWS(GJH)-2015-8-126] [REFERRED]
BABU VS. R. SUNIL KUMAR [LAWS(KER)-2014-11-243] [REFERRED TO]
BABU VS. R. SUNIL KUMAR [LAWS(KER)-2014-11-243] [REFERRED TO]
PALANISAMY VS. VIJAYAKUMAR [LAWS(MAD)-2021-1-38] [REFERRED TO]
APARNA AJINKYA FIRODIA VS. AJINKYA ARUN FIRODIA [LAWS(SC)-2023-2-44] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF GUJARAT VS. SAW PIPES LTD. (KNOWN AS JINDAL SAW LTD.) [LAWS(SC)-2023-4-56] [REFERRED TO]
K.PERUMAL VS. S.SHAKILADEVI [LAWS(MAD)-2018-12-131] [REFERRED TO]
SATYA ROOPA SINHA VS. SARWAN KUMAR MEHTO [LAWS(P&H)-2022-6-130] [REFERRED TO]
MUKESH AND ANOTHER VS. STATE FOR NCT OF DELHI AND OTHERS. [LAWS(SC)-2017-5-43] [REFERRED TO]
ANJANA SAHARAWAT VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. [LAWS(RAJ)-2015-1-363] [REFERRED TO]
SUKHDEV PAKHARWAL VS. REKHA OKHLE & ANR [LAWS(MPH)-2018-5-375] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND VS. SARDAR PARWAN SINGH [LAWS(UTN)-2019-11-154] [REFERRED TO]
PAPPU VS. STATE [LAWS(DLH)-2016-5-63] [REFERRED TO]
RAM KRISHAN SHARMA VS. JAGMOHAN DUTT SHARMA MINOR THROUGH SH CHET RAM & ORS [LAWS(HPH)-2016-12-141] [REFERRED TO]
H. SUSHEELA VS. G. HANUMANTHAPPA [LAWS(KAR)-2014-9-190] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)Petitioner happens to be the husband of respondent no. 1, Lata Nandlal Badwaik and alleged to be the father of girl child Netra alias Neha Nandlal Badwaik, respondent no. 2, herein. The marriage between them was solemnized on 30th of June, 1990 at Chandrapur. Wife filed an application for maintenance under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, but the same was dismissed by the learned Magistrate by order dated 10th December, 1993. Thereafter, the wife resorted to a fresh proceeding under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the 'Code') claiming maintenance for herself and her daughter, inter alia, alleging that she started living with her husband from 20th of June, 1996 and stayed with him for about two years and during that period got pregnant. She was sent for delivery at her parents' place where she gave birth to a girl child, the respondent no. 2 herein. Petitioner-husband resisted the claim and alleged that the assertion of the wife that she stayed with him since 20th of June, 1996 is false. He denied that respondent no. 2 is his daughter. After 1991, according to the husband, he had no physical relationship with his wife. The learned Magistrate accepted the plea of the wife and granted maintenance at the rate of Rs.900/- per month to the wife and at the rate of Rs.500/- per month to the daughter. The challenge to the said order in revision has failed so also a petition under Section 482 of the Code, challenging those orders.
(2.)It is against these orders, the petitioner has preferred this special leave petition.
(3.)Leave granted.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.