S MAHABOOB BADHA Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA
LAWS(SC)-2014-9-154
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: KARNATAKA)
Decided on September 23,2014

S Mahaboob Badha Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF KARNATAKA Respondents


Referred Judgements :-

NARSINGH PRASAD SINGH VS. RAJ KUMAR alias PAPPU [REFERRED TO]



Cited Judgements :-

ALAMGIR VS. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH [LAWS(HPH)-2015-3-32] [REFERRED TO]
KAUSAR HASHMI, S/O WASHIM HASHMI VS. STATE OF BIHAR [LAWS(PAT)-2015-4-2] [REFERRED TO]
TAJINDER SINGH VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [LAWS(P&H)-2015-4-69] [REFERRED TO]
THE STATE OF GUJARAT VS. JAGANNATH VAMAN DEVRE AND ORS. [LAWS(GJH)-2015-10-95] [REFERRED TO]
KRISHNA RANA AND ORS. VS. STATE OF HARYANA [LAWS(P&H)-2015-11-123] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH VS. SUNEEL DUTT [LAWS(HPH)-2016-7-82] [REFERRED TO]
SALENDER PAL VS. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH [LAWS(HPH)-2016-5-114] [REFERRED TO]
VINOD KUMAR VS. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH [LAWS(HPH)-2016-4-108] [REFERRED TO]
GOPAL DAS VS. STATE OF M P [LAWS(MPH)-2016-8-95] [REFERRED]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)Leave granted.
(2.)This appeal arises out of the Order of the Karnataka High Court in Crl. R.P. No. 2148 of 2010 dated 29.10.2013, confirming the conviction of the Appellant under Section 498A Indian Penal Code and reducing the sentence of imprisonment of one year to six months and enhancing the fine amount from Rs. 3000/- to Rs. 10,000/- and in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for two months.
(3.)Brief facts of the case are that, the Appellant-first accused is the husband of PW-1, Smt. Noorunnisa and their marriage was solemnized on 06.02.1994 and the couple has two daughters and one son. Sometime after the marriage, accused No. 1 started physically torturing PW-1, and subjected her to cruelty by assaulting her and demanded/dowry of Rs. 50,000/- or a house from her parents. On 25.05.2001, at about 9.30 p.m., when PW-1 was in the house situated at Gandhi Nagar, Bellary, the Appellant abused PW-1 and her father PW-2 in filthy language and Appellant pushed PW-2 and voluntarily caused simple hurt to him. Father of the Appellant-accused No. 2 is alleged to have committed criminal intimidation by threatening PW-2 with dire consequences. At the time of marriage of Appellant and PW-1, the Appellant and Accused No. 2- father of the Appellant are said to have accepted dowry of Rs. 50,000/-, gold, silver, clothes etc. and further alleged to have harassed PW-1 demanding more dowry from her parents. On the complaint lodged by PW-1, case was registered against the Appellant and his father under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 Indian Penal Code read with Section 34 Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. On completion of the investigation, charge-sheet was filed against the Appellant and his father.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.