RAM NIRANJAN ROY Vs. STATE OF BIHAR
LAWS(SC)-2014-3-73
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: PATNA)
Decided on March 31,2014

Ram Niranjan Roy Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF BIHAR Respondents


Referred Judgements :-

PRITAM PAL V. HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH,JABALPUR,THROUGH REGISTRAR [REFERRED TO]
CHANDRA SHASHI VS. ANIL KUMAR VERMA [REFERRED TO]
PRAKASH SINGH VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
LEILA DAVID VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [REFERRED TO]
RANVEER YADAV VS. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]



Cited Judgements :-

D VENKATESH VS. M G DEENDAYALAN [LAWS(KAR)-2018-4-42] [REFERRED TO]
COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION VS. RAJIV RANJAN [LAWS(JHAR)-2024-5-64] [REFERRED TO]
PANKAJ S. BANSAL. VS. ARUNKUMAR RAMSWARUP AGGARWAL & ORS. [LAWS(BOM)-2020-2-47] [REFERRED TO]
ANIL KUMAR DUBEY VS. PRADEEP KUMAR SHUKLA [LAWS(CHH)-2017-1-27] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)A petition was filed in public interest in the Patna High Court being C.W.J.C. No. 1311 of 2003 by Bihar Vyavsayik Sangharsh Morcha and another raising several issues relating to law and order problem in the State of Bihar. The State of Bihar, the Director General of Police of Bihar and others were made party respondents. The issues raised inter alia were whether the respondents were duty bound to provide safe and healthy atmosphere for the proper development of the State or not and whether the inaction of the respondents was violative of fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 19 and 20 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner inter alia sought direction to the respondents to take measures to stop exploitation of shopkeepers, dealers, artisans, labourers and industrial units by officers and police personnel.
(2.)The High Court issued notices to the respondents pursuant to which they filed affidavits. On 14/08/2003 the High Court directed the Director General of Police to make a list of officers from the Station House Officers upto the Additional Director General of Police, of those who have remained in their station for more than four years. Relevant paragraphs from the High Court's order could be quoted:
"The court suggests the following measures as an ad interim exercise:

a) Let the Director General Police make out a list of officers from the Station House Officer upto the Additional Director General of Police, of those who have remained in their station for more than four years. This dossier is to be supported with information from service record as to which officer throughout their career has remained at which station and for how long. Officers who have remained at one station for over four years must see a posting out within six weeks from today. These would be officers below the rank of Inspector General of Police. Staff below the SHOs who have remained at a particular station beyond three years will be identified by the District heads of police concerned and their movement will be undertaken by the Director General of Police.

It must be mentioned that the period of four years is set because in the normal course of government service, transfers and postings are made for officers if they have been at a particular station for more than three years. This order obviously does not preclude the Director General of Police from making any transfers should an officer have been at a posting for a lesser period, which is within normal administrative powers."

(3.)In December, 2003, the appellant, who was holding the post of Deputy Superintendent of Police, Crime Investigation Department (CID), Bihar, filed an intervention application being I.A.No.5588 of 2003. The appellant claimed in the application that he was the President of Bihar Police Seva Sangh, a service association of members of Bihar Police Service. He stated in the application that the transfers and postings of the officers of Bihar Police Service were done arbitrarily in violation of guiding principles framed by the Home Department of Government of Bihar. The appellant referred to a Writ Application filed by him being C.W.J.C. No.12225 of 1999 against the State of Bihar for an order directing the respondents to implement the said guiding principles. He stated that the said writ application has been pending in the High Court for last four years during which the government has tried to victimize him mala fide. He further stated that his application should be heard along with the C.W.J.C. No.1311 of 2003. He, therefore, prayed that he may be impleaded in C.W.J.C. No.1311 of 2003.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.