M.S. SANDHU Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB
LAWS(SC)-2014-5-23
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Decided on May 07,2014

M.S. Sandhu Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB Respondents





Cited Judgements :-

V.K. MITTAL & ORS VS. REGISTRAR GENERAL, HIGH COURT OF DELHI & ORS [LAWS(DLH)-2016-1-109] [REFERRED TO]
AGARWAL INDUSTRIES LTD. VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(APH)-2016-6-26] [REFERRED TO]
S. THIRUNAVUKKARASU AND OTHERS VS. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT AND OTHERS [LAWS(MAD)-2018-6-1435] [REFERRED TO]
SNEH KOHLI VS. UNIVERSAL ENGLISH TRUST & ANR [LAWS(BOM)-2016-10-48] [REFERRED TO]
RAJEEV BHARDWAJ AND ORS. VS. STATE OF H.P AND ORS. [LAWS(HPH)-2020-3-104] [REFERRED TO]
PRASHANT KUMAR SONA VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(DLH)-2024-7-42] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)Leave granted.
(2.)The perennial dispute of seniority between the direct recruits and promotees, that keeps showing its fang time and again in one form or the other, has surfaced in these batch of appeals as well. Having regard to the nature of the dispute, we deem it proper to narrate the facts sequentially and while doing so, we will also be stating the respective positions which the parties to this lis have taken. In this manner by the time statement of facts is over, we shall have crystallized the issues as well, which need to be answered.
(3.)Genesis of the dispute lies in the Punjab Police Service Rules 1959 (hereinafter referred to as "1959 Rules") and the origin can be traced to the judgment of this Court in the case of Paramjit Singh & Ors. vs. Ram Rakha, 1979 3 SCC 478. The dispute before us relates to seniority in the cadre of Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP) between the direct recruits and promotees in these proceedings, which was the subject matter of the aforesaid decision as well. However, before discussing the nature of dispute we would like to take stock of the relevant provisions of 1959 Rules.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.