P S MEHERHOMJI Vs. K T VIJAY KUMAR
LAWS(SC)-2014-10-82
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: ANDHRA PRADESH)
Decided on October 14,2014

P S Meherhomji Appellant
VERSUS
K T Vijay Kumar Respondents


Referred Judgements :-

MUSHTAQ AHMAD VS. MOHD. HABIBUR REHMAN FAIZI AND OTHERS [REFERRED TO]
MADHAVRAO JIWAJIRAO SCINDIA VS. SAMBHAJIRAO CHANDROJTRAO ANGRE [REFERRED TO]
CHANDDHAWAN VS. JAWAHARLAL [REFERRED TO]
RADHEY SHYAM KHEMKA NAND KISHORE TULSIAN VS. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA VS. SAYED MOHAMMED MASOOD [REFERRED TO]
FAHIM KHAN VS. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]



Cited Judgements :-

PARSHOTTAM ODHAVJIBHAI SOLANKI VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2018-12-15] [REFERRED TO]
NARESH KANAYALAL RAJWANI VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(BOM)-2024-5-79] [REFERRED TO]
HARSHAD DOLATRAM GEARIYA VS. HEENABEN HARSHADBHAI GERAIYA [LAWS(GJH)-2016-7-188] [REFERRED TO]
ASHISH RAJ VS. STATE OF M.P. [LAWS(MPH)-2018-8-383] [REFERRED TO]
ANIL KUMAR VS. ABHISHEK ENTERPRISE [LAWS(GJH)-2017-3-394] [REFERRED TO]
EHTESHAM & ANOTHER VS. UNION OF INDIA, DPETT OF CENTRAL BUREAU OF NARCOTICS & ANR [LAWS(ALL)-2016-1-371] [REFERRED]
MERAZUDDIN VS. STATE OF U.P. [LAWS(ALL)-2016-7-323] [REFERRED TO]
V RADHAKRISHNA AND 6 OTHERS VS. ALLA RAMA KRISHNA REDDY [LAWS(APH)-2018-1-29] [REFERRED TO]
HAMJA VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(ALL)-2016-1-369] [REFERRED]
PUTTAN VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2015-2-3] [REFERRED TO]
ROHINI SINGH D/O LATE MR. M.B. SINGH & 6 VS. STATE OF GUJARAT & 1 [LAWS(GJH)-2018-1-435] [REFERRED TO]
VIRUPAKSHA ELECTRICALS PVT. LTD. VS. STATE OF TELANGANA [LAWS(TLNG)-2019-11-72] [REFERRED TO]
GHULAM MUSTAFFA KHATEEB VS. MASOODA AMIN AND OTHERS [LAWS(J&K)-2018-5-58] [REFERRED TO]
DOLLYBEN KANTILAL PATEL VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2019-6-251] [REFERRED TO]
VICKY @ NAVEEN SINGHANIA VS. STATE OF M.P. AND ANOTHER [LAWS(MPH)-2016-11-17] [REFERRED TO]
ANIL RAJA VS. STATE OF ASSAM [LAWS(GAU)-2019-1-157] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)Leave granted.
(2.)This appeal arises out of an order dated 5.12.2009 passed by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad in Criminal Petition No. 3917 of 2007, whereby the High Court dismissed the petition preferred by the Appellant and Respondent No. 4 herein, Under Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing proceedings in C.F. No. 2425 of 2007 on the file of 1st Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada relating to offence Under Section 499 of the Indian Penal Code (in short, 'Indian Penal Code'). Respondent No. 4 (Rallies India Ltd.) and the Appellant, Company Secretary of M/s. Rallies India Ltd.. are accused Nos. 1 and 2 in the aforesaid proceedings.
(3.)The brief facts of the case are that K.T. Vijay Kumar-Respondent No. 1 joined M/s. Rallis India Ltd..-Respondent No. 4, as Sales Representative and later promoted to different posts. The Company entrusted various powers to him including the powers to recommend various companies or firms for dealership to sell company's product. Taking advantage of the powers entrusted by the Company, Respondent No. 1 along with few of his relatives and friends clandestinely formed two partnership firms and he appointed them as Company's dealers to misappropriate funds by way of diverting goods from M/s. Rallies India. It is alleged that upon enquiry, it was found that huge amount of stocks were routed clandestinely through the said two firms and Respondent No. 1-Vijay Kumar along with his associates defrauded the Company M/s. Rallies India. It is further alleged that Vijay Kumar-Respondent No. 1 floated a Company called Chemical Biotech Ltd.. with his wife and relatives at Vijayawada while he was serving with M/s. Rallies India Ltd.. and his Company was dealing, producing and trading in the same products as manufactured by Respondent No. 4 company-M/s. Rallies India. When all the facts came to light, he resigned from M/s. Rallies India-Respondent No. 4.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.