N. PADMAMMA Vs. S. RAMAKRISHNA REDDY
LAWS(SC)-2014-9-132
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Decided on
September 23,2014
N. Padmamma
Appellant
VERSUS
S. Ramakrishna Reddy
Respondents
Referred Judgements :-
P LAKSHMI REDDY VS. L LAKSHMI REDDY [REFERRED TO]BHUBANESHWAR PRASAD NARAIN SINGH VS. SIDHESWAR MUKHERJEE [REFERRED TO]
KALGONDA BABGONDA PATIL VS. BALGONDA KALGONDA PATIL [REFERRED TO]
SHIVAPPA TAMMANNAPPA KARABAN VS. PARASAPPA HANAMMAPPA KURABAN [REFERRED TO]
LOKRAJ VS. KISHAN LAL [REFERRED TO]
N PADMAMMA VS. S RAMAKRISHNA REDDY [REFERRED TO]
Cited Judgements :-
SURENDRA KUMAR VS. PRAMOD KUMAR SINGHANIA [LAWS(RAJ)-2018-8-284] [REFERRED TO]SRINIVASA NAYAK VS. SUNDAR NAYAK AND ORS. [LAWS(KAR)-2016-4-64] [REFERRED TO]
IMAMSA CHANDAS GURIKAR SINCE (DECEASED) BY L.RS. AND OTHERS VS. MOHDINSA NABISA GURIKAR SINCE (DECEASED) BY L.RS. AND OTHERS [LAWS(KAR)-2017-12-80] [REFERRED TO]
PARVATHAMMA W/O LATE S BASAPPA SINCE DEAD BY HER LRS VS. B SUBRAMANYA SHARMA S/O LATE RAMA SWAMAIAH [LAWS(KAR)-2019-7-410] [REFERRED TO]
RAYADURGAM SUBRAMANYAM VS. RAYADURGAM GANGAIAH [LAWS(APH)-2020-1-23] [REFERRED TO]
PANDIAN VS. MADHANMOHAN [LAWS(MAD)-2018-1-209] [REFERRED TO]
KAPILDEO SINGH & ORS VS. JAMUNA SINGH & ORS [LAWS(PAT)-2015-9-19] [REFERRED TO]
YELURU RAMAKRISHNA, S/O. VENKATESHWARLU VS. YELURU VENKATESHWARLU, S/O. TIRUMALAIAH AND OTHERS [LAWS(APH)-2018-1-61] [REFERRED TO]
S.RAMACHARI AND OTHERS VS. M/S. TRICHSALA INFRASTRUCTURE PVT.LTD. AND OTHERS [LAWS(TLNG)-2021-7-13] [REFERRED TO]
HEIRS OF DECD MANIBEN D/O NARANBHAI ISHVARBHAI AND WD/O KANTILAL NATHALAL PATEL VS. HEIRS OF DECD DWARKABHAI NARANBHAI ISHVARBHAI & 3 [LAWS(GJH)-2016-9-28] [REFERRED]
ISHWAR VS. JATTAMMA [LAWS(KAR)-2023-5-460] [REFERRED TO]
MIR SADATH ALI VS. JOINT COLLECTOR [LAWS(TLNG)-2024-5-8] [REFERRED TO]
ISHWER SINGH VS. JANAK SINGH [LAWS(CHH)-2019-10-130] [REFERRED TO]
RATHI SHEDTHI VS. SHEENA SHETTY [LAWS(KAR)-2019-2-185] [REFERRED TO]
RUDRAMMA AND ORS. VS. NAGARAJU AND ORS. [LAWS(KAR)-2015-7-56] [REFERRED TO]
SHRI. PUNJA RAMA BODKE VS. SHRI. SHIVAJI VITOBA BODKE AND ORS [LAWS(BOM)-2016-12-58] [REFERRED TO]
S THIAGARAJAN VS. CHITKALA GOVINDASWAMY [LAWS(MAD)-2015-9-319] [REFERRED TO]
RAM BRIKSHA VS. DY. DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION [LAWS(ALL)-2017-5-48] [REFERRED TO]
PARMANAND AND OTHERS VS. BITAWAN BAI AND OTHERS [LAWS(CHH)-2016-1-29] [REFERRED TO]
EXECUTIVE OFFICER VS. JOINT COLLECTER , MAHABUBNAGAR [LAWS(TLNG)-2022-11-75] [REFERRED TO]
CHIKKAVENKATARAYAPPA AND ORS. VS. MUDDAPPA AND ORS. [LAWS(KAR)-2015-6-189] [REFERRED TO]
KAMALA AND ORS. VS. RAJOOVI PADMAPPA AND ORS. [LAWS(KAR)-2015-4-65] [REFERRED TO]
TRIJUGI NARAIN VS. SANKOO [LAWS(SC)-2019-12-92] [REFERRED TO]
D. KOUSALYA VS. NARAYANAPPA [LAWS(KAR)-2022-11-797] [REFERRED TO]
JUDGEMENT
-
(1.)This appeal has been placed before this larger bench pursuant to a reference made by a Division Bench of this Court comprising S.B. Sinha and Lokeshwar Singh Panta, JJ. The reference Order N. Padmamma and Ors. v. S. Ramakrishna Reddy and Ors., 2008 15 SCC 517 formulates the following question for determination:
Whether the civil court has jurisdiction to entertain a suit for partition for division of respective shares amongst the members of a joint family, when in respect of some of the lands, occupancy right has been granted in favour of one of them in terms of the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Abolition of Inams Act, 1955 (for short "the Act") is the question involved herein.
(2.)We may before adverting to the precise question and the rival contentions urged before us, briefly recapitulate the facts:
(3.)S. Ramakrishna Reddy original owner was survived by his sons, namely, S. Ramachandra Reddy and S. Anantharam Reddy. The former passed away in the year 1968 leaving behind two wives, two daughters and a son. In this appeal the two wives and their children are pitted against each other. While the Appellants-Plaintiffs in this appeal are the first wife and her daughter, the Defendants-Respondents are the son, second wife and the daughter left behind by the deceased.
Whether the civil court has jurisdiction to entertain a suit for partition for division of respective shares amongst the members of a joint family, when in respect of some of the lands, occupancy right has been granted in favour of one of them in terms of the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Abolition of Inams Act, 1955 (for short "the Act") is the question involved herein.
(2.)We may before adverting to the precise question and the rival contentions urged before us, briefly recapitulate the facts:
(3.)S. Ramakrishna Reddy original owner was survived by his sons, namely, S. Ramachandra Reddy and S. Anantharam Reddy. The former passed away in the year 1968 leaving behind two wives, two daughters and a son. In this appeal the two wives and their children are pitted against each other. While the Appellants-Plaintiffs in this appeal are the first wife and her daughter, the Defendants-Respondents are the son, second wife and the daughter left behind by the deceased.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.