SUDARSHAN RAJPOOT Vs. U P STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION
LAWS(SC)-2014-11-34
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: ALLAHABAD)
Decided on November 18,2014

Sudarshan Rajpoot Appellant
VERSUS
U P STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION Respondents





Cited Judgements :-

SECRETARY VS. PRAKASHBHAI D RATHOD & 1 ORS [LAWS(GJH)-2016-9-31] [REFERRED]
NAGAR PALIKA NIGAM VS. ARUN SHARMA [LAWS(MPH)-2015-7-3] [REFERRED TO]
D. ANBALAGAN VS. STATE OF TAMIL NADU [LAWS(MAD)-2022-7-92] [REFERRED TO]
TULCHA RAM SON OF LATE SHRI HEERA RAM VS. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN [LAWS(RAJ)-2017-3-161] [REFERRED TO]
MANAGER, GROUP FOUR SECURITY SERVICES INDIA PVT. LTD. VS. VICE PRESIDENT, AURANGABAD MAZDOOR UNION, [LAWS(BOM)-2020-3-507] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF U.P. VS. MOHD. RAIS [LAWS(ALL)-2020-2-53] [REFERRED TO]
MADHYANCHAL VIDYUT VITARAN NIGAM LTD. VS. STATE OF U.P. [LAWS(ALL)-2023-5-74] [REFERRED TO]
DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION VS. OMBIR SINGH AND ANR. [LAWS(DLH)-2017-8-179] [REFERRED TO]
ALSTOM INDIA LIMITED VS. SIDRAM AND ORS. [LAWS(KAR)-2015-11-177] [REFERRED TO]
MAHESH S/O SANJAYRAO BAHAD VS. MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION [LAWS(BOM)-2020-2-125] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF GUJARAT VS. PRESIDING OFFICER & ANR [LAWS(GJH)-2018-4-39] [REFERRED TO]
JITENDER KUMAR VS. DIRECTORATE OF HEALTH SERVICES [LAWS(DLH)-2019-10-47] [REFERRED TO]
ARUN RAMBHAU PHATAK AND ORS. VS. MAHATMA PHULE KRUSHI VIDYAPEETH [LAWS(BOM)-2015-10-185] [REFERRED TO]
JIWIT PROSAD ARYA VS. CHIEF SECURITY COMMISSIONER, RAILWAY PROTECTION FORCE AND OTHERS [LAWS(CAL)-2018-9-171] [REFERRED TO]
PRAKASH GHASIT DHIKKYAV AND ORS. VS. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. [LAWS(BOM)-2016-3-75] [REFERRED TO]
RAJAN VISHNU CHAUK VS. PRESIDENT [LAWS(BOM)-2015-10-218] [REFERRED TO]
PRAGATISHEEL ENGINEERING SHRAMIK SANGH INDUSTRIAL ESTATE VS. SIMPLEX CASTINGS LTD [LAWS(CHH)-2019-9-11] [REFERRED TO]
KANHAYA LAL VS. THE MANAGEMENT OF M/S SWANTANTRA BHARAT MILL [LAWS(DLH)-2016-3-78] [REFERRED TO]
M.P. BIJALI METER READERS KARMACHARI SANGH AND ORS. VS. THE STATE OF ADVISORY CONTRACT LABOUR BOARD AND OTHERS [LAWS(MPH)-2016-6-132] [REFERRED TO]
UTTARAKHAND FOREST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND OTHERS VS. ANOOP CHANDRA BHATT [LAWS(UTN)-2019-3-71] [REFERRED TO]
EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LIMITED VS. THEIR WORKMEN, PLANT [LAWS(JHAR)-2021-8-64] [REFERRED TO]
CHAUDHARY CHARAN SINGH UNIVERSITY MEERUT VS. PRESIDING OFFICER LABOUR COURT [LAWS(ALL)-2015-4-416] [REFERRED TO]
INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, KHARAGPUR VS. SANJEEB KUMAR SINGH & ORS [LAWS(CAL)-2017-4-108] [REFERRED TO]
NAREDDY RENUKA VS. N P D C OF T G AND 2 OTHERS [LAWS(APH)-2016-6-76] [REFERRED]
SHIHOR MUNICIPALITY VS. GUJARAT MAZDOOR SANGH R P NARIGARA [LAWS(GJH)-2019-4-159] [REFERRED TO]
GUJARAT MAZDOOR SABHA & 1 VS. VALSAD NAGAR PALIKA & 3 [LAWS(GJH)-2018-11-67] [REFERRED TO]
ONGC FIELD OPERATORS UNION VS. ONGC LTD. [LAWS(APH)-2016-3-44] [REFERRED TO]
NANDA VS. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AND ORS. [LAWS(BOM)-2015-5-84] [REFERRED TO]
MANOJ KUMAR VS. SINTEX INDUSTRIES PVT. LIMITED. [LAWS(HPH)-2016-3-84] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)Leave granted.
(2.)These civil appeals are directed against the impugned judgment and orders dated 5.3.2008 and 3.8.2010 passed in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 21553(C) of 2005 and Civil Misc. Review Application No. 93051 of 2008 by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. Vide order dated 05.03.2008 the High Court allowed the writ petition filed by the respondent- U.P. State Road Transport Corporation (in short 'the respondent-Corporation') and quashed the award dated 31.05.2004 passed by the Labour Court and held that the appellant-workman would be entitled to consolidated damages/compensation equivalent to the retrenchment compensation calculated from the date of his engagement till the date of his disengagement. The Review Application of the Corporation was rejected.
(3.)Brief facts in nutshell are stated hereunder for the purpose of appreciating rival legal contentions with a view to find out as to whether the impugned judgment is required to be interfered with or not by this Court in exercise of its appellate jurisdiction.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.