CITY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT THR. ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR Vs. PLATINUM ENTERTAINMENT
LAWS(SC)-2014-9-91
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: BOMBAY)
Decided on September 26,2014

City Industrial Development Thr. Its Managing Director Appellant
VERSUS
Platinum Entertainment Respondents





Cited Judgements :-

RUPA & CO. LTD. VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL [LAWS(CAL)-2020-2-193] [REFERRED TO]
NAVEENCHANDRA NIRALELAL SRIVASTAVA VS. TATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2019-2-152] [REFERRED TO]
KRIPA INDANE AND OTHERS VS. CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF SIKKIM AND OTHERS [LAWS(SIK)-2019-4-7] [REFERRED TO]
TAPAN BHATTACHARYA VS. MINISTRIES OF INDUSTRIES & OTHERS [LAWS(MPH)-2018-8-317] [REFERRED TO]
STAR ABASAN PVT. LTD. VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL [LAWS(CAL)-2023-9-97] [REFERRED TO]
AJAY CHOUHAN VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH [LAWS(CHH)-2019-11-94] [REFERRED TO]
PT. GOPAL PRASAD DUBEY VS. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY [LAWS(KAR)-2022-8-474] [REFERRED TO]
CHANDRA DYEING AND PRINTING MILLS PVT LTD VS. GUJARAT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION [LAWS(GJH)-2017-2-73] [REFERRED TO]
CHAMRU RAM KARMA S/O LATE SHRI BOJHA MAJHI VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH THROUGH SECRETARY [LAWS(CHH)-2016-9-68] [REFERRED TO]
GOVERNMENT OF MADHYA PRADESH VS. ISHWAR CHANDRA, S/O PANCHURAM KHAIRWAR [LAWS(CHH)-2016-9-39] [REFERRED]
K.R. GARG VS. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. [LAWS(P&H)-2016-1-83] [REFERRED TO]
BIHAR OFFSET PRINTERS ASSOCIATION AND OTHERS VS. THE STATE OF BIHAR [LAWS(PAT)-2018-2-282] [REFERRED TO]
O.M. DEBARA VS. GOVERNMENT OF A.P. [LAWS(TLNG)-2024-1-25] [REFERRED TO]
SHRADDHA COMMERCIAL PREMISES CO-OP SOCIETY, AURANGABAD VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS [LAWS(BOM)-2018-9-85] [REFERRED TO]
INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. MANORAMA SOLANKI [LAWS(MPH)-2018-3-360] [REFERRED TO]
FEDERATION OF NOIDA RESIDENTS WELFARE ASSOCIATION VS. NOIDA TOLL BRIDGE COMPANY LTD. AND OTHERS [LAWS(ALL)-2016-10-135] [REFERRED TO]
ISHWAR CHANDRA, S/O SHRI PANCHURAM KHAIRWAR VS. GOVERNMENT OF MADHYA PRADESH (PRESENTLY GOVERNMENT OF CHHATTISGARH) [LAWS(CHH)-2016-9-76] [REFERRED TO]
JYOTI THAKUR VS. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD & ORS [LAWS(HPH)-2016-10-95] [REFERRED TO]
SATWANT KUMAR MAHILANG VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH [LAWS(CHH)-2018-7-148] [REFERRED TO]
MOHAMMAD SIRAJ JINDRAN VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH & OTHERS [LAWS(CHH)-2017-1-60] [REFERRED TO]
GOPAL PRASAD DUBEY VS. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY [LAWS(KAR)-2022-8-594] [REFERRED TO]
ZUITLUANGI H/O H ZATLUANGA VS. STATE OF MIZORAM [LAWS(GAU)-2016-6-67] [REFERRED]
JAM AALA AJABHAI AND ORS. VS. ESSAR POWER GUJARAT LIMITED AND ORS. [LAWS(GJH)-2015-10-137] [REFERRED TO]
GULSHAN KUMAR VS. STATE OF H.P. [LAWS(HPH)-2016-6-162] [REFERRED TO]
INDIAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS VS. CITY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. [LAWS(BOM)-2024-7-37] [REFERRED TO]
AJAY CHOUHAN VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH [LAWS(CHH)-2023-11-61] [REFERRED TO]
GOVINDA PRASAD LADIA VS. WBHIDC LIMITED [LAWS(CAL)-2015-5-37] [REFERRED TO]
CABLE T.V. OPERATORS ASSOCIATION AND ORS. VS. STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. [LAWS(KER)-2015-8-17] [REFERRED TO]
JAIN & BROTHERS VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH [LAWS(CHH)-2021-8-25] [REFERRED TO]
WINSOFT TECHNOLOGIES (AN EDUCATIONAL TRUST) VS. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND OTHERS [LAWS(P&H)-2016-7-148] [REFERRED TO]
ESSAR BULK TERMINAL LIMITED VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2017-4-278] [REFERRED TO]
T.HARISH RAO VS. GOVERNMENT OF A.P. [LAWS(TLNG)-2024-4-77] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)Leave granted.
(2.)These appeals are directed against the common judgment and final order dated 01.09.2009 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay whereby Division Bench of the High Court has allowed three Writ Petitions being W.P.Nos. 9467, 9468 of 2005 and 3423 of 2006 preferred respectively by M/s. Popcorn Entertainment Corporation (in short, 'M/s. Popcorn'), M/s. Platinum Entertainment (in short, 'M/s. Platinum') and M/s. Platinum Square Trust (in short, 'M/s. Platinum Square'). By way of these writ petitions, the writ petitioners had challenged orders of appellant- 'The City & Industrial Development Corporation' (in short 'CIDCO') by which allotment of plot of lands to M/s. Popcorn and M/s. Platinum Entertainment for erecting entertainment complex in Navi Mumbai and the allotment of plot of land to M/s. Platinum Square for establishment of country club were cancelled.
(3.)The facts giving rise to aforesaid writ petitions and consequently present appeals are almost similar. However, for the sake of clarity factual matrix of each appeal has been mentioned here separately.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.