M.FASEELA Vs. MUNNERUL ISLAM MADRASA COMMITTEE
LAWS(SC)-2014-3-108
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Decided on March 31,2014

M.Faseela Appellant
VERSUS
Munnerul Islam Madrasa Committee Respondents





Cited Judgements :-

MUSHKE SRINIVAS REDDY VS. TELANGANA STATE WAQF BOARD [LAWS(TLNG)-2024-2-43] [REFERRED TO]
IDARA ISLAM PANIPAT AND OTHERS VS. HARYANA WAKF BOARD, AMBALA CANTT AND OTHERS [LAWS(P&H)-2018-5-139] [REFERRED TO]
KULDEEP SAHNY VS. M.P. WAQF BOARD, BHOPAL [LAWS(MPH)-2019-11-335] [REFERRED TO]
MUMTAZ AHMED VS. STATE OF H.P. AND OTHERS [LAWS(HPH)-2016-11-33] [REFERRED TO]
MANOJ KUMAR VS. KERALA STATE WAKF BOARD [LAWS(KER)-2019-2-324] [REFERRED TO]
BIHAR AWAMI COOPERATIVE BANK LTD. VS. BIHAR STATE SUNNI WAKF BOARD [LAWS(PAT)-2022-9-44] [REFERRED TO]
SYED MASOON ALI VS. ABU NAIM SIDDIQUE & ANR [LAWS(CAL)-2018-6-47] [REFERRED TO]
M/S BADAM BALAKRISHNA HOTEL PVT. LTD VS. MUMTAZ YARUD DOWLA WAKF [LAWS(TLNG)-2021-11-101] [REFERRED TO]
S.N.M.UBAYADULLAH VS. HAZARATH SERYA/SHAMIYAN SAQQAF THAIKKAL THANJAVUR [LAWS(MAD)-2022-6-290] [REFERRED TO]
TELANGANA STATE WAKF BOARD VS. MOHAMED MUZAFAR [LAWS(SC)-2021-8-11] [REFERRED TO]
MUMTAZ YARUD DOWLA WAKF VS. BADAM BALAKRISHNA HOTEL PVT. LTD [LAWS(SC)-2023-10-62] [REFERRED TO]
RAMSWAROOP VS. MOHAMMAD ISLAM [LAWS(RAJ)-2022-3-321] [REFERRED TO]
NAMBIDI PRAKASAN VS. DARUTHAQVA ISLAMIC CULTURAL CENTRE [LAWS(KER)-2022-6-84] [REFERRED TO]
MOIDU VS. NARAYANAN [LAWS(KER)-2016-12-81] [REFERRED TO]
GOSULA RAMULU, S/O. BOGURAIAH, AGED : 52 YEARS, OCC : AGRICULTURE, (DIED) PER LRS AND OTHERS VS. A.P. WAKF BOARD, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, NAMPALLY, HYDERABAD AND OTHERS [LAWS(APH)-2017-3-28] [REFERRED TO]
SHIREEN BANO VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH [LAWS(CHH)-2017-10-73] [REFERRED TO]
SHAIKH ISMAIL VS. CHOTIBI [LAWS(BOM)-2020-5-17] [REFERRED TO]
THE BOARD OF AUQAF, W.B. VS. JB. SK. SAFIK & ORS. [LAWS(CAL)-2016-7-194] [REFERRED TO]
PUNJAB WAKF BOARD VS. SHAM SINGH HARIKE [LAWS(SC)-2019-2-37] [REFERRED TO]
RAJINDER SINGH AULAKH VS. MOTA SINGH SEKHON [LAWS(P&H)-2012-3-15] [REFERRED TO]
M/S.SAI PAWAN ESTATES PVT. LTD. VS. TELANGANA STATE WAKF BOARD [LAWS(TLNG)-2021-3-100] [REFERRED TO]
ANWAR HUSSAIN LASKAR VS. SITAL CHANDRA PAUL [LAWS(GAU)-2019-1-119] [REFERRED TO]
THE BOARD OF AUQAF, WEST BENGAL VS. GOLAM MUSTAPHA & ANOTHER [LAWS(CAL)-2018-6-4] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)Leave granted.
(2.)Sections 6 and 7 of the Waqf Act, 1995 (for short, 'Act') provide for determination of certain disputes regarding auqaf only by the Waqf Tribunal. These provisions as amended by Act 27/2013 read as under:
Section 6. Disputes regarding auqaf.- (1) If any question arises whether a particular property specified as waqf property in the list of auqaf is waqf property or not or whether a waqf specified in such list is a Shia waqf or Sunni waqf, the Board or the mutawalli of the waqf or any person aggrieved may institute a suit in a Tribunal for the decision of the question and the decision of the Tribunal in respect of such matter shall be final:

Provided that no such suit shall be entertained by the Tribunal after the expiry of one year from the date of the publication of the list of auqaf.

Provided further that no suit shall be instituted before the Tribunal in respect of such properties notified in a second or subsequent survey pursuant to the provisions contained in Sub-section (6) of Section 4.

(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in Sub-section (1), no proceeding under this Act in respect of any waqf shall be stayed by reason only of the pendency of any such suit or of any appeal or other proceeding arising out of such suit.

(3) The Survey Commissioner shall not be made a party to any suit under Sub-section (1) and no suit, prosecution or other legal proceeding shall lie against him in respect of anything which is in good faith done or intended to be done in pursuance of this Act or any rules made thereunder.

(4) The list of auqaf shall, unless it is modified in pursuance of a decision or the Tribunal under Sub-section (1), be final and conclusive.

(5) On and from the commencement of this Act in a State, no suit or other legal proceeding shall be instituted or commenced in a court in that State in relation to any question referred to in Sub-section (1).

Section 7. Power of Tribunal to determine disputes regarding auqaf.- (1) If, after the commencement of this Act, any question or dispute arises, whether a particular property specified as waqf property in a list of auqaf is waqf property or not, or whether a waqf specified in such list is a Shia waqf or a Sunni waqf, the Board or the mutawalli of the waqf, or any person aggrieved by the publication of the list of auqaf Under Section 5 therein, may apply to the Tribunal having jurisdiction in relation to such property, for the decision of the question and the decision of the Tribunal thereon shall be final:

Provided that-

(a) in the case of the list of auqaf relating to any part of the State and published after the commencement of this Act no such application shall be entertained after the expiry of one year from the date of publication of the list of auqaf; and

(b) in the case of the list of auqaf relating to any part of the State and published at any time within a period of one year immediately preceding the commencement of this Act, such an application may be entertained by Tribunal within the period of one year from such commencement:

Provided further that where any such question has been heard and finally decided by a civil court in a suit instituted before such commencement, the Tribunal shall not re-open such question.

(2) Except where the Tribunal has no jurisdiction by reason of the provisions of Sub-section (5), no proceeding under this section in respect of any waqf shall be stayed by any court, tribunal or other authority by reason only of the pendency of any suit, application or appeal or other proceeding arising out of any such suit, application, appeal or other proceeding.

(3) The Chief Executive Officer shall not be made a party to any application under Sub-section (1).

(4) The list of auqaf and where any such list is modified in pursuance of a decision of the Tribunal under Sub-section (1), the list as so modified, shall be final.

(5) The Tribunal shall not have jurisdiction to determine any matter which is the subject-matter of any suit or proceeding instituted or commenced in a civil court under Sub-section (1) of Section 6, before the commencement of this Act or which is the subject-matter of any appeal from the decree passed before such commencement in any such suit or proceeding or of any application for revision or review arising out of such suit, proceeding or appeal, as the case may be.

(6) The Tribunal shall have the powers of assessment of damages by unauthorised occupation of waqf property and to penalise such unauthorised occupants for their illegal occupation of the waqf property and to recover the damages as arrears of land revenue through the Collector:

Provided that whosoever, being a public servant, fails in his lawful duty to prevent or remove an encroachment, shall on conviction be punishable with fine which may extend to fifteen thousand rupees for each such offence.

(3.)Thus, Sections 6 and 7 of the Act not only confer exclusive jurisdiction upon the Waqf Tribunal for determination of certain disputes regarding auqaf but also take jurisdiction of the civil court away in respect of such disputes.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.