RENU Vs. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, TIS HAZARI
LAWS(SC)-2014-2-21
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: DELHI)
Decided on February 12,2014

RENU Appellant
VERSUS
District And Sessions Judge, Tis Hazari Respondents


Referred Judgements :-

UNIVERSITY OF MYSORE H H ANNISH GOWDA VS. C D GOVINDA RAO [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF WEST BENGAL VS. NRIPENDRA NATH BAGEHI [REFERRED TO]
M GURU MOORTHY VS. ACCOUNTANT GENERAL ASSAM AND NAGALAND [REFERRED TO]
BARADAKANTA MISHRA STATE OF ORISSA VS. REGISTRAR OF ORISSA HIGH COURT:SHRI BARADAKANTA MISHRA [REFERRED TO]
DARSHAN LAL VS. STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR [REFERRED TO]
CHIEF JUSTICE OF ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH VS. L V A DIXITULU:V V S KRISHNAMURTHY [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. N HARGOPAL [REFERRED TO]
SOM RAJ VS. STATE OF HARYANA [REFERRED TO]
H C PUTTASWAMY VS. HONBLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT BANGALORE [REFERRED TO]
DELHI DEVELOPMENT HORTICULTURE EMPLOYEES UNION VS. DELHI ADMINISTRATION DELHI [REFERRED TO]
KUMAR PADMA PRASAD VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF HARYANA VS. PIARA SINGH [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH K L SHARMA R D GUPTA ARUN KUMAR MISHRA VS. U P STATE LAW OFFICERS ASSOCIATION :U P STATE LAW OFFICERS ASSOCIATION HIGH COURT ALLAHABAD :STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH:STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
J A S INTER COLLEGE KHURJA U P VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
PRABHAT KUMAR SHARMA VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
EXCISE SUPERINTENDENT MALKAPATNAM KRISHNA DISTRICT A P VS. K B N VISWESHWARA RAO [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VS. C L AGRAWAL [REFERRED TO]
ARUN TEWARI VS. ZILA MANSAVI SHIKSHAK SANGH [REFERRED TO]
YOGINATH D BAGDE VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [REFERRED TO]
KISHORE K PATI VS. DISTT INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS MIDNAPORE [REFERRED TO]
SUBEDAR SINGH VS. DISTRICT JUDGE MIRZAPUR [REFERRED TO]
SURESH KUMAR VS. STATE OF HARYANA [REFERRED TO]
B R KAPUR VS. STATE OF TAMIL NADU [REFERRED TO]
MOR MODERN COOPERATIVE TRANSPORT SOCIETY LIMITED VS. FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF HARYANA [REFERRED TO]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASHTAN VS. P P SINGH [REFERRED TO]
BINOD KUMAR GUPTA VS. RAM ASHRAY MAHOTO [REFERRED TO]
UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION VS. GIRISH JAYANTI LAL VAGHELA [REFERRED TO]
M P HOUSING BOARD VS. MANOJ SHRIVASTVA [REFERRED TO]
BRANCH MANAGER M P STATE AGRO INDUSTRIES DEVLOPMENT CORPN LTD VS. S C PANDEY [REFERRED TO]
ARUN SINGH ALIAS ARUN KUMAR SINGH VS. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]
SECRETARY STATE OF KARNATAKA VS. UMADEVI [REFERRED TO]
I R COELHO VS. STATE OF TAMIL NADU [REFERRED TO]
M P STATE COOP BANK LTD VS. NANURAM YADAV [REFERRED TO]
HARI BANSH LAL VS. SAHODAR PRASAD MAHTO [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF ORISSA VS. MAMATA MOHANTY [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF WEST BENGAL VS. DEBASISH MUKHERJEE [REFERRED TO]
REGISTRAR GENERAL HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS VS. R PERACHI [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH VS. SANDHYA TOMAR [REFERRED TO]
CENTRAL ELECTRICITY SUPPLY VS. DHOBEI SAHOO [REFERRED TO]



Cited Judgements :-

B. RAMAKOTESWARA RAO VS. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH [LAWS(APH)-2024-2-15] [REFERRED TO]
NANDIBAI VS. PRASHANT VARVADE & ORS [LAWS(MPH)-2018-5-275] [REFERRED TO]
BHUPEN NATH VS. STATE OF ASSAM [LAWS(GAU)-2019-9-131] [REFERRED TO]
VICE PRESIDENT, REGIONAL COMMITTEE, C C L JANTA MAZDOOR SANGH, RANCHI (JHARKHAND) VS. PROJECT OFFICER, ASHOK PROJECT PIPARWAR, C C L BACHRA, CHATRA (JHARKHAND) [LAWS(JHAR)-2018-6-57] [REFERRED TO]
INTER UNIVERSITY ACCELERATOR CENTRE VS. MANISHA RANI [LAWS(DLH)-2023-8-104] [REFERRED TO]
RATHEESH DASAN VS. STATE OF KERALA [LAWS(KER)-2023-5-26] [REFERRED TO]
MOHAMMED FAIZAN VS. STATE OF U.P. [LAWS(ALL)-2024-5-11] [REFERRED TO]
ARJUN RAM SAHU VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH [LAWS(CHH)-2024-4-69] [REFERRED TO]
RAM SINGH VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2014-12-343] [REFERRED TO]
AJAY KUMAR MISRA AND ORS. VS. HONBLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD AND ORS. [LAWS(ALL)-2015-8-142] [REFERRED TO]
VISHWANATH PRASAD AND OTHERS VS. STATE OF U P AND OTHERS [LAWS(ALL)-2017-11-147] [REFERRED TO]
R. VENKATACHALAM VS. TAMIL NADU ELECTRICITY GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION [LAWS(MAD)-2017-12-92] [REFERRED TO]
ANURAG VS. STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS [LAWS(PAT)-2018-7-358] [REFERRED TO]
SATISH CHANDRA MISHRA VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(HPH)-2019-12-56] [REFERRED TO]
SHIRSHAL RAJENDRA POTDUKHE VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(BOM)-2016-7-111] [REFERRED TO]
SHIV SHANKER SHARMA VS. STATE OF J&K AND ORS. [LAWS(J&K)-2015-4-20] [REFERRED TO]
NARAYAN SINGH CHAUHAN VS. STATE OF C.G.& OTHERS [LAWS(CHH)-2016-12-20] [REFERRED TO]
HARNARAYAN YADAV VS. CHHATTISGARH PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION AND OTHERS [LAWS(CHH)-2017-4-56] [REFERRED TO]
PAWAN KUMAR VS. STATE OF U P AND OTHERS [LAWS(ALL)-2019-7-17] [REFERRED TO]
YASHIKA ARORA VS. GOVT. OF NCT DELHI [LAWS(DLH)-2021-9-121] [REFERRED TO]
TALESHKUMAR MAGANBHAI PATEL AND ORS. VS. AHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS. [LAWS(GJH)-2015-6-123] [REFERRED TO]
N MAHESHA VS. REGISTRAR GENERAL HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA [LAWS(KAR)-2019-7-373] [REFERRED TO]
S. VIMALRAJ AND ORS. VS. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, SCHOOL EDUCATION (C2) DEPARTMENT AND ORS. [LAWS(MAD)-2014-12-259] [REFERRED TO]
MANOJ KUMAR JHA VS. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ORS. [LAWS(JHAR)-2015-10-141] [REFERRED TO]
ASHOK KUMAR LAL VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL [LAWS(CAL)-2022-1-4] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH VS. DIVYA DARSHAN SHARMA [LAWS(MPH)-2018-3-352] [REFERRED TO]
MR. SANDEEP TULSHIRAM MOHITE VS. REGISTRAR, SMALL CAUSES COURT, MUMBAI [LAWS(BOM)-2017-4-136] [REFERRED TO]
KARNATAKA KAIGARIKA PRADESHABHIVRUDDI MANDALI VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [LAWS(KAR)-2020-5-130] [REFERRED TO]
K.ULAGANATHAN VS. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS [LAWS(MAD)-2019-12-559] [REFERRED TO]
VIJAY KUMAR VS. STATE OF BIHAR [LAWS(PAT)-2023-5-16] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR & ORS VS. DISTRICT BAR ASSOCIATION, BANDIPORA [LAWS(SC)-2016-12-14] [REFERRED TO]
RAHUL PRAMOD YADAV VS. REGISTRAR [LAWS(BOM)-2023-10-31] [REFERRED TO]
NIM KANTA MAITI VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL [LAWS(CAL)-2020-1-73] [REFERRED TO]
BHOLA NATH BHARDWAJ VS. HIMACHAL PRADESH GENERAL INDUSTRIES CORPORATION LTD. [LAWS(HPH)-2014-7-169] [REFERRED TO]
SUSHAJ MUTHU T.S AND OTHERS VS. MANAGING DIRECTOR AND OTHERS [LAWS(KER)-2017-12-255] [REFERRED TO]
J B VYAS AND ORS VS. STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS [LAWS(GJH)-2014-3-189] [REFERRED TO]
KANTA DEVI VS. SARVODAYA KANYA VIDYALAYA [LAWS(DLH)-2015-5-110] [REFERRED TO]
JAGMOHAN SINGH VS. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS [LAWS(P&H)-2016-7-74] [REFERRED TO]
S.SUBRAMANIAM VS. STATE OF KERALA [LAWS(KER)-2020-10-380] [REFERRED TO]
YANGMI HAOREI VS. STATE OF MANIPUR [LAWS(MANIP)-2018-1-4] [REFERRED TO]
TAMIL NADU GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION LTD. VS. SATHISH KANNAN [LAWS(MAD)-2021-7-163] [REFERRED TO]
K. BASAVARAJE URS VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. [LAWS(KAR)-2016-2-334] [REFERRED TO]
NARESH CHANDRA GUPTA VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH [LAWS(CHH)-2020-9-13] [REFERRED TO]
SUNANDA DUTTA VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND ORS. [LAWS(CHH)-2015-7-14] [REFERRED TO]
VIRENDRA PANDEY VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND ORS. [LAWS(CHH)-2016-2-2] [REFERRED TO]
SANTOSH SAHU VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND ORS. [LAWS(CHH)-2016-3-2] [REFERRED TO]
SATISH CHANDRA BAJPAI VS. HONBLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND ORS. [LAWS(ALL)-2015-12-121] [REFERRED TO]
MUNSHI RAM AND ORS. VS. STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND ORS. [LAWS(J&K)-2016-4-7] [REFERRED TO]
ARVINDER SINGH AMN VS. STATE OF JAMMU & KASHMIR [LAWS(J&K)-2019-10-34] [REFERRED TO]
CALCUTTA STATE TRANSPORT CORPORATION VS. BIMAL CHANDRA ROY [LAWS(CAL)-2021-3-86] [REFERRED TO]
NIRMAL MAHATO VS. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS. [LAWS(JHAR)-2018-1-153] [REFERRED TO]
CHANDRABALI RAM, SON OF LATE GANGA VISHNU RAM, RESIDENT OF QR. NO. 2/106, B.I.T., SINDRI CAMPUS, P.O. AND P.S. SINDRI, DISTRICT DHANBAD VS. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND [LAWS(JHAR)-2016-9-69] [REFERRED TO]
EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT VS. THEIR WORKMEN BEING REPRESENTED BY THE ZONAL SECRETARY, BIHAR COLLIERY MAZDOOR SABHA [LAWS(JHAR)-2018-12-175] [REFERRED TO]
RAMCHANDRA MALI VS. PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AND ORS. [LAWS(RAJ)-2014-5-246] [REFERRED TO]
GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU VS. TAMIL NADU MAKKAL NALA PANIYALARGAL MUNNETTRA SANGAM [LAWS(MAD)-2014-8-20] [REFERRED TO]
RAHIMUNNISSA AND ORS. VS. THE REGISTRAR GENERAL HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. [LAWS(KAR)-2020-3-165] [REFERRED TO]
KANTAHARAJU M S/O MALLAIAH VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION [LAWS(KAR)-2019-4-69] [REFERRED TO]
NATIONAL FEDERATION OF BLIND MAHARASHTRA AND ANR VS. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY [LAWS(BOM)-2018-5-49] [REFERRED TO]
KAPIL KUMAR S/O RAM ISHWAR YADAV VS. STATE OF BIHAR [LAWS(PAT)-2019-12-45] [REFERRED TO]
JACOB STEPHEN; G SIVAPRASAD; PADMINI SUDHEESH VS. STATE OF KERALA AND ORS [LAWS(KER)-2015-10-288] [REFERRED]
GAZETTED HEADMASTERS PRADESHIK SANGH VS. STATE OF M.P. [LAWS(MPH)-2014-9-109] [REFERRED TO]
AJAY CHORDIYA VS. VICE CHANCELLOR, DAVV, INDORE & OTHERS [LAWS(MPH)-2016-4-128] [REFERRED]
UTTARAKHAND VIDHAN SABHA SECRETARIAT DEHRADUN VS. BHUPENDRA SINGH BISHT [LAWS(UTN)-2022-11-17] [REFERRED TO]
GANGA DEVI VS. STATE OF BIHAR [LAWS(PAT)-2022-7-52] [REFERRED TO]
SANJAY KUMAR VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(P&H)-2020-2-251] [REFERRED TO]
AVTAR SINGH KALRA AND OTHERS VS. HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH AND ANOTHER [LAWS(P&H)-2017-3-3] [REFERRED TO]
SUPREME COURT ADVOCATE-ON-RECORD ASSOCIATION VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(SC)-2015-10-80] [REFERRED TO]
DEEPA C DAS VS. DEEPA M M [LAWS(KER)-2019-1-7] [REFERRED TO]
VISHNU CHANKRA THAPLIYAL VS. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND [LAWS(UTN)-2014-11-18] [REFERRED TO]
GOURAV SHARMA VS. RAJASTHAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION [LAWS(RAJ)-2022-5-173] [REFERRED TO]
PYNSKHEMLANG NONGRANG VS. DIRECTORATE OF SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION [LAWS(MEGH)-2022-6-30] [REFERRED TO]
ANKIT BAGHEL VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [LAWS(MPH)-2019-2-262] [REFERRED TO]
PANKAJ NAILWAL AND ANOTHER VS. SECRETARY GENERAL, SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [LAWS(DLH)-2017-10-175] [REFERRED TO]
SINTU PODDAR AND ANOTHER VS. STATE OF JHARKHAND AND OTHERS [LAWS(JHAR)-2017-5-93] [REFERRED TO]
SUNIL DUTT MISHRA VS. STATE OF JHARKHAND [LAWS(JHAR)-2017-8-102] [REFERRED TO]
RAKESH CHOUBEY VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH [LAWS(CHH)-2019-8-76] [REFERRED TO]
COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING VS. K.P. JAGANATHAN [LAWS(MAD)-2014-6-165] [REFERRED TO]
DIPENDRA SANWAL VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [LAWS(RAJ)-2018-2-124] [REFERRED TO]
NIRKITABEN MOHITKUMAR SONI VS. REGISTRAR, HONOURABLE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AND ORS. [LAWS(GJH)-2014-7-184] [REFERRED TO]
BIHAR YUVA ADHIWAKTA KALYAN SAMITTEE VS. PATNA HIGH COURT [LAWS(PAT)-2018-4-198] [REFERRED TO]
DURGESH KUMAR PRASAD VS. THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY PATNA AND ORS. [LAWS(PAT)-2015-9-48] [REFERRED TO]
ARVINDER SINGH AMN VS. STATE OF J&K [LAWS(J&K)-2019-10-36] [REFERRED TO]
MEERA BAI RAIKWAR VS. STATE OF M. P. [LAWS(MPH)-2019-7-96] [REFERRED TO]
ANIL KUMAR E K AND ANOTHER VS. STATE OF KERALA AND OTHERS [LAWS(KER)-2017-8-157] [REFERRED TO]
SHYLA SHIVAPPA BUDIHAL VS. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT [LAWS(KAR)-2019-2-443] [REFERRED TO]
KHAGENDRA NATH SAU VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS [LAWS(CAL)-2017-12-32] [REFERRED TO]
BADRI NARAYAN ROUTRAY VS. STATE OF ODISHA [LAWS(ORI)-2022-7-99] [REFERRED TO]
ABHISHEK KUMAR VS. OFFICE OF DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE (HQ) [LAWS(DLH)-2021-4-108] [REFERRED TO]
AJAY KUMAR MISRA AND ORS. VS. HONBLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD AND ORS. [LAWS(ALL)-2015-10-10] [REFERRED TO]
ANIL KUMAR SHUKLA VS. DISTRICT INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS [LAWS(ALL)-2014-3-185] [REFERRED TO]
ANTI-CORRUPTION PEOPLES MOVEMENT REGISTRATION NO. EKM/TC/245/2013 VS. STATE OF KERALA [LAWS(KER)-2022-12-213] [REFERRED TO]
ANIL KUMAR DWIVEDI S/O RAMAKANT DWIVEDI VS. SECRETARY, VIDHAN SABHA SACHIVALAYA, CHHATTISGARH VIDHAN SABHA [LAWS(CHH)-2019-3-183] [REFERRED TO]
RAMAN SAHANI VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH [LAWS(CHH)-2023-4-33] [REFERRED TO]
HARESHBHAI SOMABHAI MEJIYATAR VS. REGISTRAR [LAWS(GJH)-2022-2-509] [REFERRED TO]
UNIVERSITY OF KALYANI VS. JATINDRANATH BHAKTA [LAWS(CAL)-2014-8-145] [REFERRED TO]
THE REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL SERVICE), HIGH COURT, APPELLATE SIDE AND ORS. VS. MOUMITA SEN AND ORS. [LAWS(CAL)-2016-4-41] [REFERRED TO]
RIYA DAS VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND OTHERS [LAWS(CAL)-2019-2-56] [REFERRED TO]
BIMAL CHANDRA ROY VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL [LAWS(CAL)-2019-9-115] [REFERRED TO]
PRAVIN KUMAR RANA VS. STATE OF JHARKHAND [LAWS(JHAR)-2018-12-145] [REFERRED TO]
NARESH JHA VS. STATE OF JHARKHAND [LAWS(JHAR)-2018-6-116] [REFERRED TO]
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, PAKUR VS. ARUN KUMAR MISHRA, S/O SRI KRISHNA PRASAD MISHRA, R/O VILLAGE & P.O. [LAWS(JHAR)-2016-7-46] [REFERRED TO]
RAJENDRA BADAIK, SON OF LATE JOKHNA BADAIK VS. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND AND OTHERS [LAWS(JHAR)-2017-9-140] [REFERRED TO]
SANOUJAM SHYAMCHARAN SINGH VS. STATE OF MANIPUR [LAWS(MANIP)-2020-2-9] [REFERRED TO]
ALI MOHD. RAWAT VS. STATE OF J&K AND ORS. [LAWS(J&K)-2014-10-30] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF BIHAR VS. PRAFULLA KUMAR CHAUDHARY [LAWS(PAT)-2023-3-56] [REFERRED TO]
BHARATSINH M JHALA VS. STATE OF GUJARAT & 2 [LAWS(GJH)-2018-2-104] [REFERRED TO]
B.PRADEEP. VS. HIGH COURT OF KERALA [LAWS(KER)-2019-12-39] [REFERRED TO]
SAIJA RANI. P VS. STATE OF KERALA [LAWS(KER)-2020-8-637] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)The matter initially related to the appointment of Class IV employees in the courts subordinate to Delhi High Court as the dispute arose about the continuity of the employees appointed on ad-hoc basis for 89 days which stood extended for the same period after same interval from time to time. The matter reached the Delhi High Court and ultimately before this Court. This court vide order dated 10.5.2012 took up the matter in a larger perspective taking cognizance of perpetual complaints regarding irregularities and illegalities in the recruitments of staff in the subordinate courts throughout the country and in order to ensure the feasibility of centralising these recruitments and to make them transparent and transferable. This Court suo motu issued notice to Registrar Generals of all the High Courts and to the States for filing their response mainly on two points viz. (i) why the recruitment be not centralized; and (ii) why the relevant rules dealing with service conditions of the entire staff be not amended to make them as transferable posts. All the States and High Courts have submitted their response and all of them are duly represented in the court.
(2.)This Court had appointed Shri P.S. Narasimha, learned senior counsel as Amicus Curiae to assist the court. The matter was heard on 28.1.2014 and deliberations took place at length wherein all the learned counsel appearing for the States as well as for the High Courts suggested that the matter should be dealt with in a larger perspective i.e. also for appointments of employees in the High Court and courts subordinate to the High Court which must include Class IV posts also. A large number of instances have been pointed out on the basis of the information received under the Right to Information Act, 2005 of cases not only of irregularity but of favouritism also in making such appointments. It has been suggested by the learned counsel appearing in the matter that this court has a duty not only to check illegality, irregularity, corruption, nepotism and favouritism in judicial institutions, but also to provide guidelines to prevent the menace of back-door entries of employees who subsequently are ordered to be regularised.
(3.)It was in view of the above that this Court vide its earlier orders had asked learned counsel appearing for the States as well as the High Courts to examine the records of their respective States/Courts and report as to whether a proper and fair procedure had been adopted for evaluating the candidates. A mixed response was received from different counsel on these issues.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.