PREMPAL Vs. STATE OF HARYANA
LAWS(SC)-2014-9-10
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: PUNJAB & HARYANA)
Decided on September 03,2014

PREMPAL Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA Respondents


Referred Judgements :-

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA V. KRISHNAMURTI LAXMIPATI NAIDU [REFERRED TO]
SURAJDEO OJHA V. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]
KAKE SINGH V. STATE OF M.P. [REFERRED TO]
NANHAU RAM V. STATE OF M.P. [REFERRED TO]
KHUSHAL RAO VS. STATE OF BOMBAY [REFERRED TO]
HAL BANS SINGH VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [REFERRED TO]
GOPALSINGH VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
RASHEED BEG VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
MUNNU RAJA VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
K RAMACHANDRA REDDY VS. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR [REFERRED TO]
RAM MANORATH CHHOTEY VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
MOHANLAL GANGARAM GEHANI VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [REFERRED TO]
RAMAWATI DEVI VS. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VS. RAM SAGAR YADAV [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VS. MADAN MOHAN [REFERRED TO]
PANIBEN VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [REFERRED TO]
RAVI VS. STATE OF T N [REFERRED TO]
MUTHU KUTTY VS. STATE [REFERRED TO]
BAPU VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [REFERRED TO]



Cited Judgements :-

LAXMAN VS. STATE OF U.T., CHANDIGARH [LAWS(P&H)-2015-5-476] [REFERRED TO]
BIRMA DEVI VS. STATE OF HARYANA [LAWS(P&H)-2015-3-354] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH VS. DHARAM SINGH [LAWS(HPH)-2015-2-19] [REFERRED TO]
RAM GOPAL VS. STATE OF HARYANA [LAWS(P&H)-2015-7-86] [REFERRED TO]
PARMAR CHIMANBHAI BALCHANDBHAI AND ORS. VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2016-2-211] [REFERRED TO]
STATE VS. MALLIKARJUN REDDY [LAWS(KAR)-2017-8-32] [REFERRED TO]
GOPAL TANK VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [LAWS(RAJ)-2017-11-74] [REFERRED TO]
DURGESH SINGH BHADAURIA VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [LAWS(MPH)-2021-8-21] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)This appeal arises out of the judgment of High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh dated 28.11.2011 passed in Crl. Appeal No. 716- DB/2002, in and by which the High Court confirmed the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 IPC and also the sentence of life imprisonment imposed on the appellant.
(2.)Briefly stated, the case of the prosecution is that, marriage of Smt. Anita (deceased) with Dharampal was solemnized in the year 1997. Appellant-Prempal is the younger brother of Dharampal. On 24.10.2001 at 3.00 p.m. Anita was all alone at her matrimonial house located at village Budana. Her husband Dharampal working as a teacher in village Milakpur had not returned home from the school; her mother-in-law had gone to her parents house. When Anita was all alone, the appellant-Prempal grappled with Anita and pushed her down and alleged to have set her on fire at about 3.00 p.m. along with Jai Singh, father of the appellant. Anita was brought to Shanti Hospital, Narnaund by her father-in-law Jai Singh with 95% burn injuries on her body on the same day at 4.00 p.m. On receipt of the information from the Medical Officer and after obtaining opinion of the Medical Officer that Anita was in a fit condition to make the statement, Assistant Sub Inspector of Police (PW 8) requested PW-4, Tehsildar to record the statement of Anita. Tehsildar-cum-Executive Magistrate (PW 4) reached the hospital and again sought opinion of the Medical Officer (Ext. P13) who opined that Anita was fit to make a statement. Tehsildar (PW4) recorded the statement of Anita (Ext. P11) in which deceased Anita stated that her brother-in-law Prempal grappled with her and pushed her aside and poured kerosene upon her and set her ablaze.
Based on her statement, FIR was registered under Section 307 IPC against the appellant. PW-8 had taken up the investigation and prepared the Rough Site Map of the spot and seized material objects from the scene of the crime.

(3.)On 24.10.2001 at about 11.45 P.M., Anita succumbed to injuries. On receipt of intimation about the death of Anita, the investigating officer went to the hospital and held the inquest proceedings and prepared the Inquest Report. PW-1, Dr. J.P. Malik conducted autopsy on the body of deceased Anita and issued the Post Mortem Certificate. The investigating officer recorded the statement of Dhan Singh (PW 7) and Chhotu Ram father of Anita. The case registered under Section 307 IPC was altered into Section 302 IPC and after completion of investigation, charge sheet was filed against the appellant and Jai Singh - father-in-law of deceased.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.