VIRESHWAR SINGH Vs. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI
LAWS(SC)-2014-9-4
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: DELHI)
Decided on September 02,2014

VIRESHWAR SINGH Appellant
VERSUS
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI Respondents





Cited Judgements :-

K.P. SINGH VS. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. [LAWS(DLH)-2017-1-140] [REFERRED TO]
AMIT ATTRI VS. ANIL VERMA [LAWS(HPH)-2014-12-1] [REFERRED TO]
SUSHIL PRADHAN VS. STATE OF SIKKIM [LAWS(SIK)-2021-1-7] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)Leave granted.
(2.)The appellants are General Duty Medical Officers (GDMO) Grade-II who were appointed on ad hoc basis between 1986 and 1989. They are aggrieved by the denial of their claim to regularization with effect from the dates of their initial appointments. Regularization granted from the date of the recommendations of the Union Public Service commission (for short 'UPSC'), namely, 24.07.1998 as approved by the High Court of Delhi by means of the impugned order dated 05.07.2011 has been called into question in the present appeal.
(3.)The relevant facts are as follows.
The post of GDMO Grade-II is a Group 'A' post governed by the Delhi Municipal Corporation Health Service Recruitment Regulations, 1982 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Regulations'). Under the said Regulations appointment in the post of GDMO Grade-II is required to be made through the UPSC. Between 1982 and 1986 (for convenience may be referred to as the Phase-I) 82 GDMOs were appointed on ad hoc basis for an initial term of six months which was subsequently extended from time to time. In what may be again conveniently referred to as the Phase-II, between 1986-1989, another 69 number of GDMOs were appointed on ad hoc basis on terms similar to the appointments made in Phase-I. Both sets of appointments were not through the UPSC but were made on the basis of a selection held by a Specially Constituted Selection Committee.



Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.