VARINDER SINGH Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB
LAWS(SC)-2014-1-32
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: PUNJAB & HARYANA)
Decided on January 16,2014

VARINDER SINGH Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB Respondents


Referred Judgements :-

STATE OF HARYANA VS. BHAJAN LAL [REFERRED TO]
SUNDAR BABU VS. STATE OF TAMIL NADU [REFERRED TO]



Cited Judgements :-

UPENDRA KUMAR SHARMA VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2015-1-30] [REFERRED TO]
JAGPREET SINGH @ PREET VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS [LAWS(P&H)-2015-7-666] [REFERRED]
VIJAY MADANLAL CHOUDHARY VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(SC)-2022-7-97] [REFERRED TO]
VAKIL RAJ AND ORS. VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. [LAWS(P&H)-2015-11-67] [REFERRED TO]
PRADEEP NIRANKARNATH SHARMA VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2021-6-360] [REFERRED TO]
DYANI ANTONY PAUL VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(KAR)-2020-12-254] [REFERRED TO]
MOHAMMAD NAWAB MOHAMMAD ISLAM MALIK @ NAWAB MALIK VS. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT [LAWS(BOM)-2022-3-64] [REFERRED TO]
GOPAL KRISHNA PATAR @ RAJA PETER VS. STATE OF JHARKHAND [LAWS(JHAR)-2018-8-111] [REFERRED TO]
DEVAS MULTIMEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED VS. THE JOINT DIRECTOR [LAWS(KAR)-2017-10-108] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)Leave granted.
(2.)This appeal is filed by the appellant questioning the correctness of the judgment and final order passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in petition Crl. Misc. No. M-13296 of 2011 (O & M) urging various facts and legal contentions in support of his case.
(3.)Necessary relevant facts are stated hereunder to appreciate the case of the appellant and also to find out whether the appellant is entitled to the relief prayed for in this appeal.
The appellant had gone as a visitor to the Central Jail, Ferozepur on 17.09.2009. There, on being searched, a mobile phone was recovered from his turban and a charger was recovered from his shoes. An FIR dated 24.09.2009 was filed at the Police Station Ferozepur, under Sections 42 and 45 (12) of the Prisons Act, 1894 (in short "the Act"). The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Ferozepur charged him on 01.05.2010 under Sections 42 and 45 of the Act. The appellant approached the High Court of Punjab and Haryana by way of a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, praying that the FIR be quashed. The High Court of Punjab and Haryana by way of impugned judgment and final order dated 19.07.2013 dismissed the petition, and inter alia held that " .the accused is at liberty to take all pleas available to him during the trial".



Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.