JUSTICE RIPUSUDAN DAYAL Vs. STATE OF M.P.
LAWS(SC)-2014-2-46
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: MADHYA PRADESH)
Decided on February 25,2014

Justice Ripusudan Dayal Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF M.P. Respondents





Cited Judgements :-

JUSTICE (RETD.) MARKANDEY KATJU VS. THE LOK SABHA & ANR. [LAWS(SC)-2016-12-32] [REFERRED TO]
HARISH CHANDRA SINGH RAWAT VS. UNION OF INDIA & ANOTHER [LAWS(UTN)-2016-4-51] [REFERRED]
PRIYANKKUMAR HAMIRBHAI GALCHAR VS. COMMISSIONER, & 2 OTHER (S) [LAWS(GJH)-2019-4-26] [REFERRED TO]
SITA SOREN VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(SC)-2024-3-10] [REFERRED TO]
SUBHASH CHANDRA AGARWAL VS. LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT [LAWS(DLH)-2019-7-119] [REFERRED TO]
M.K. STALIN VS. SPEAKER, TAMILNADU LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY [LAWS(MAD)-2020-8-219] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)The present writ petition, under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, has been filed by the petitioners challenging the validity of certain letters issued by Mr. Qazi Aqlimuddin Secretary, Vidhan Sabha (Respondent No.4 herein) on various dates against them with regard to a case registered by the Special Police Establishment (SPE) of the Lokayukt Organisation, against the officials of the Vidhan Sabha Secretariat as well as against the concerned officials of the Capital Project Administration- the Contractor Company alleging irregularity in the construction work carried out in the premises of Vidhan Sabha.
(2.)It is relevant to mention that Petitioner No.1 herein was the Lokayukt of the State of Madhya Pradesh appointed under the provisions of the Madhya Pradesh Lokayukt Evam Uplokayukt Act, 1981 (hereinafter referred to as "the Lokayukt Act"). Petitioner No.2 was the Legal Advisor, a member of the Madhya Pradesh Higher Judicial Service on deputation with the Lokayukt and Petitioner Nos. 3 to 5 were the officers of Madhya Pradesh Special Police Establishment.
(3.)The petitioners herein claimed that the said letters violate their fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and are contrary to Article 194(3) and prayed for the issuance of a writ, order or direction(s) quashing the said letters as well as the complaints filed by Respondent Nos. 5, 6 (since expired), 7, 8 and 9 herein.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.