K. PRAKASH Vs. B.R. SAMPATH KUMAR
LAWS(SC)-2014-9-79
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: KARNATAKA)
Decided on September 22,2014

K. PRAKASH Appellant
VERSUS
B.R. Sampath Kumar Respondents


Referred Judgements :-

NIRMALA ANAND VS. ADVENT CORPORATION PRIVATE LIMITED [REFERRED TO]



Cited Judgements :-

MOTILAL DAYALANI VS. ASHOK KUMAR GUHA [LAWS(CHH)-2022-9-95] [REFERRED TO]
RAJ LAND CORPORATION VS. ICHCHHAPORE INDUSTRIAL CO OP SERVICE SOCIETY LTD [LAWS(GJH)-2024-2-10] [REFERRED TO]
PREMSINH DALOTSINH CHAVDA VS. ASHOKBHAI RAMNIKLAL TOLAT [LAWS(GJH)-2023-12-7] [REFERRED TO]
VIRENDRA KUMAR VS. E J SHRIVASTAVA [LAWS(CHH)-2015-8-46] [REFERRED]
OM BUILDERS (P) LTD VS. ANIL CHINUBHAI KILACHAND & ORS [LAWS(BOM)-2015-10-241] [REFERRED]
UMESH PRASAD YADAV VS. PUSPA SINHA AND ORS. [LAWS(PAT)-2015-7-78] [REFERRED TO]
K. NANJAPPA VS. R.A. HAMEED AND ORS. [LAWS(SC)-2015-9-6] [REFERRED TO]
BIRINDER PAL SINGH VS. GANDHARAV SINGH NAGRA [LAWS(P&H)-2018-10-174] [REFERRED TO]
DUNI CHAND VS. SHYAM LAL [LAWS(HPH)-2020-3-92] [REFERRED TO]
PATEL HARJI SHAMJI VS. DHARMSHI MEGHJI SHIVLA SINCE DIED THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS AND REPRESENTATIVE BIPIN DHARAMSINH SAVLA [LAWS(GJH)-2018-8-378] [REFERRED TO]
AHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION VS. JAYKUMAR BABULAL JAIN [LAWS(GJH)-2018-6-57] [REFERRED TO]
E C CHANDRAN VS. VARKEY OMMAN S/O OMMEN CHACKO [LAWS(KER)-2015-9-200] [REFERRED]
SMT.SHYAMA DEVI & OTHERS VS. SMT. CHANDA DEVI [LAWS(ALL)-2016-7-130] [REFERRED]
VARRA TRIMURTHULU VS. BUDDARAJU VENKATA [LAWS(APH)-2024-6-6] [REFERRED TO]
DHARAMJEET KAUR VS. JAGIRO [LAWS(HPH)-2019-8-208] [REFERRED TO]
DEVARAJI VS. R. LAKSHMIKANTHAM [LAWS(MAD)-2017-2-151] [REFERRED TO]
KERBA S/O AMBADAS DHENGLE VS. DIGAMBAR S/O ISHWARA CHAVAN [LAWS(BOM)-2019-6-130] [REFERRED TO]
RUNU PRADHAN VS. STATE OF ORISSA [LAWS(ORI)-2019-9-9] [REFERRED TO]
FERRODOUS ESTATES (PVT.) LIMITED VS. P. GOPIRATHNAM [LAWS(SC)-2020-10-23] [REFERRED TO]
MADHAVAN VS. KANAKAVALLY [LAWS(SC)-2023-11-91] [REFERRED TO]
S. DEIVANAI VS. V.M. KOTHANDARAMAN [LAWS(MAD)-2017-6-80] [REFERRED TO]
M.P.KASIM @ KASMI VS. N.P.HARIS,S/O.MOIDEEN BAVA [LAWS(KER)-2016-2-182] [REFERRED TO]
MAN CHAND KATOCH VS. VIRENDER SPEYA [LAWS(HPH)-2018-7-76] [REFERRED TO]
KESHAO S/O MAHADEO NAKTODE VS. SADANAND S/O RAMAJI BHAGAT [LAWS(BOM)-2017-11-375] [REFERRED TO]
MEGHMALLAR ESTATES & SERVICES PVT. LTD. AND ORS. VS. GHANASHYAM TALUKDAR [LAWS(GAU)-2015-7-47] [REFERRED TO]
PANDURANG S/O JAGANNATH KALE VS. DEOMAHARAJ GURU VASUDEO MAHARAJ [LAWS(BOM)-2022-8-96] [REFERRED TO]
SAHNULAL VS. JAICHAND [LAWS(CHH)-2021-3-80] [REFERRED TO]
RAJENDER SINGH VS. BHOLA SINGH [LAWS(P&H)-2017-3-128] [REFERRED TO]
RATANSINGH VS. MAHESH [LAWS(MPH)-2016-9-25] [REFERRED TO]
BIBI MEHRUN NISSA VS. MD. EHSANUL HAQUE [LAWS(PAT)-2016-3-8] [REFERRED TO]
SANGAT RAM AND ANOTHER VS. HARSH KRISHAN [LAWS(HPH)-2017-12-107] [REFERRED TO]
KRISHNAMOORTHY VS. K.SHANMUGASUNDARAM [LAWS(MAD)-2022-3-120] [REFERRED TO]
V ARUMUGAM VS. R CHANDRASEKARAN [LAWS(MAD)-2016-5-47] [REFERRED]
K.V. SUDHEER BABU VS. N. BALAKRISHNAN [LAWS(KER)-2018-10-248] [REFERRED TO]
RAM DEO VS. PARAS NATH SINGH [LAWS(ALL)-2023-7-74] [REFERRED TO]
DULAL CHAND NANDI DECD THR LRS VS. KIRAN BALA MEHRU & ANR [LAWS(DLH)-2018-7-730] [REFERRED TO]
SUBHASH AGGARWAL VS. MAHENDER PAL CHABRA [LAWS(DLH)-2021-2-87] [REFERRED TO]
KISHORE KUMAR DUGGAD VS. RAJMAL JAIN [LAWS(CHH)-2019-12-179] [REFERRED TO]
JAIYENDRA PRASAD SINGH VS. RAJESH KUMAR SINGH [LAWS(PAT)-2015-10-134] [REFERRED]
A G VENKATACHALAM VS. P GANESAN [LAWS(MAD)-2018-6-564] [REFERRED TO]
V INDIRANI VS. P R BALAKRISHNAN [LAWS(MAD)-2018-8-355] [REFERRED TO]
K. PALANI VS. R. MADANA GOPAL [LAWS(MAD)-2020-3-219] [REFERRED TO]
KARNAIL SINGH VS. GURDIAL KAUR AND OTHERS [LAWS(P&H)-2018-2-286] [REFERRED TO]
KANWALJIT SINGH AND ANOTHER VS. FULJIT KUMAR AND OTHERS [LAWS(P&H)-2016-8-9] [REFERRED TO]
NAGARAJAN VS. SELVI [LAWS(MAD)-2024-3-79] [REFERRED TO]
GAJENDRA PRASAD SHARMA S/O LATE RADHEY SHYAM SHARMA VS. DEEPAK JAIN S/O HAZARI MAL JAIN [LAWS(CHH)-2018-7-194] [REFERRED TO]
HARBHAJAN SINGH VS. SARUP SINGH [LAWS(P&H)-2015-8-380] [REFERRED TO]
MONICCA SHANTHA NELSON VS. RAJALAKSHMI VENUGOPAL [LAWS(MAD)-2022-2-30] [REFERRED TO]
PARUTHIKKATTUPARAMBIL AYISHA VS. PERMBRA ABDUL NASSAR AND ORS. [LAWS(KER)-2015-6-184] [REFERRED TO]
JITENDER VS. RAJBIR SINGH [LAWS(P&H)-2022-12-153] [REFERRED TO]
K. JOHNSON DAVID VS. A. KANDASAMY [LAWS(MAD)-2017-4-164] [REFERRED TO]
SATYA PAL SINGH AND ANOTHER VS. RANJEET SINGH SIROHI AND ANOTHER [LAWS(ALL)-2019-3-179] [REFERRED TO]
HASVANTBHAI CHHANUBHAI DALAL VS. ADESINH MANSINH RAVAL & 7 OTHER(S) [LAWS(GJH)-2019-4-57] [REFERRED TO]
DHARAMSHEELA DEVI AND ORS. VS. MANISH SINHA AND ORS. [LAWS(PAT)-2015-10-24] [REFERRED TO]
VALLIYATHAL VS. P.P. SAKTHIVEL [LAWS(MAD)-2022-6-198] [REFERRED TO]
SMT. CHAMPA BAI AND OTHERS VS. PRAFULLA CHAND [LAWS(MPH)-2016-2-74] [REFERRED TO]
RAJENDRA KUMAR S/O BANSHIDHARJI GARG VS. RAMGOPAL S/O LAXMANJI AND 8 OTHERS [LAWS(MPH)-2017-8-146] [REFERRED TO]
MARIYAMMA W/O THALIYATH PAILOTH @ POULOSE VS. SHAJI S/O CHELAKKATTU KOCHAPPAN [LAWS(KER)-2018-6-309] [REFERRED TO]
NOORJAHAN VS. ABDUL RAVOOF [LAWS(KAR)-2020-10-174] [REFERRED TO]
CHANDAN TRIPATHI VS. NEELIMA PANDEY [LAWS(CHH)-2020-6-59] [REFERRED TO]
GOLD TOUCH REAL ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED AND ORS. VS. SURESH AND ORS. [LAWS(BOM)-2015-11-51] [REFERRED TO]
MAHESH CHANDRA VS. AVINASH KUMAR [LAWS(ALL)-2021-5-17] [REFERRED TO]
ARJUN PRASAD VS. GANESH PRASAD [LAWS(ALL)-2023-7-81] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)Leave granted.
(2.)This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 23.8.2011 passed by the High Court of Karnataka whereby Regular First Appeal No.396 of 2007 of the respondent was allowed, reversing the judgment of the trial court and dismissing the suit for specific performance of the agreement filed by the plaintiff-appellant.
2. The facts of the case lie in a narrow compass.

(3.)All disputes pertain to a self acquired property of the father of the respondent. The respondent's father had four sons and three daughters. On 31.7.1988, transfer of Khata was executed by all brothers and sisters in the name of the respondent. After the demise of their parents, partition seems to have taken place on 14.12.2000 among brothers and sisters and the property in question is said to have fallen to the share of defendant, who was required to pay a sum of Rs.1,25,000/- to each of the brothers and sisters in lieu of their shares in the suit house. The plaintiff had paid Rs.1,25,000/- to all his brothers and sisters except brother Selva Pillai.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.