JACKY Vs. TINY @ ANTONY
LAWS(SC)-2014-4-25
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: KERALA)
Decided on April 09,2014

Jacky Appellant
VERSUS
Tiny @ Antony Respondents





Cited Judgements :-

SURESH CHANDRA MISHRA VS. STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. [LAWS(ALL)-2015-8-7] [REFERRED TO]
RAGHUNATH ENGINEERING COMPANY VS. K. GANESAN [LAWS(MAD)-2018-1-355] [REFERRED TO]
GEORGE K.KURUVILA VS. DR.P.GOPINATH [LAWS(KER)-2017-5-62] [REFERRED TO]
KALAWATI VS. CIVIL JUDGE JUNIOR DIVISION BAHRAICH [LAWS(ALL)-2015-3-109] [REFERRED TO]
MOHAMMAD FARHAN VS. STATE OF H. P. [LAWS(HPH)-2021-1-32] [REFERRED TO]
RAJINDER SINGH JAMWAL VS. KIRAN [LAWS(J&K)-2014-10-20] [REFERRED TO]
S.KANAKARAJ VS. S.RAMALINGAM [LAWS(MAD)-2018-3-5] [REFERRED TO]
SUSHILA DEVI VS. SANTOSH KUMAR SINGH AND OTHERS [LAWS(PAT)-2017-8-220] [REFERRED TO]
LEELA DEVI VS. KAMLA [LAWS(RAJ)-2019-10-41] [REFERRED TO]
MOHAN LAL VS. MANOHAR LAL AND ANR. [LAWS(RAJ)-2015-12-141] [REFERRED TO]
REVA DEVI VS. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. [LAWS(P&H)-2016-5-3] [REFERRED TO]
GEORGE K.KURUVILA VS. P.GOPINATH [LAWS(KER)-2017-11-421] [REFERRED TO]
MRS. FARKHONDEH KHANUM VS. THE BOARD OF WAKFS, WEST BENGAL & ANR. [LAWS(CAL)-2016-11-4] [REFERRED TO]
S. PRIYA @ SHEMA PRIYA VS. STATE [LAWS(MAD)-2018-5-64] [REFERRED TO]
ARYA SHRESTHA UPADHYAY VS. WORLD COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT AND ORS. [LAWS(P&H)-2015-9-39] [REFERRED TO]
HARVINDER CHAUHAN VS. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH [LAWS(HPH)-2021-1-33] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF GUJARAT VS. PATEL JASHUBHAI SHIVABHAI [LAWS(GJH)-2022-1-1490] [REFERRED TO]
PURUSHOTTAM DAS AGARWAL VS. MOHAN KHETAN [LAWS(MPH)-2019-8-94] [REFERRED TO]
NATARAJAN VS. MOORTHY [LAWS(MAD)-2018-1-123] [REFERRED TO]
NARASUS SAARATHY ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR M V BALASUBRAMANIAM VS. NARASUS COFFEE COMPANY LIMITED [LAWS(MAD)-2017-7-393] [REFERRED TO]
KISHAN PARASRAMPURIA VS. RANCHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION [LAWS(JHAR)-2014-10-17] [REFERRED TO]
AJIT SINGH SARDAR VS. STATE [LAWS(J&K)-1971-3-13] [REFERRED]
JASODA SINGH VS. STATE OF U.P [LAWS(ALL)-2020-12-164] [REFERRED TO]
VARGHESE VS. JOSEPH (DIED), PINAL HOUSE, ATHIRAMPUZHA P.O, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT [LAWS(KER)-2017-10-303] [REFERRED TO]
RADHEY SHYAM AND ORS. VS. THE RENT TRIBUNAL AND ORS. [LAWS(RAJ)-2015-4-168] [REFERRED TO]
HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED VS. SHYAM NARAIN MEHRA & BROTHERS [LAWS(RAJ)-2015-7-62] [REFERRED TO]
VIRENDRA NARAIN RAI VS. THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. [LAWS(PAT)-2015-10-15] [REFERRED TO]
BENJEENA.P.J VS. C.P.PAPPACHAN [LAWS(KER)-2019-12-59] [REFERRED TO]
PRABHAWATI SINGH VS. STATE OF U. P. [LAWS(ALL)-2020-12-106] [REFERRED TO]
AKBAR ALI VS. ASHRAF SHEIKH AND ORS. [LAWS(J&K)-2015-7-50] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF J&K VS. SANJAY KUMAR [LAWS(J&K)-2014-8-1] [REFERRED TO]
DEEPA SHANGLOO VS. SUNIL SHANGLOO AND ORS. [LAWS(J&K)-2014-9-14] [REFERRED TO]
MAHENDRA KUMAR JAIN VS. APPELLATE RENT TRIBUNAL [LAWS(RAJ)-2021-7-123] [REFERRED TO]
SWATI DAS VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL [LAWS(CAL)-2022-7-98] [REFERRED TO]
SARATHAMBAL VS. MUTHUGANESAN [LAWS(MAD)-2021-2-398] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)Leave granted.
(2.)This appeal has been preferred by the plaintiff-appellant against the judgment and order dated 27.10.2011 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in O.P. (C) No.1792 of 2011. By the impugned judgment and order, the High Court while exercising its power under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, set aside the plaint and further proceedings initiated on the basis of the plaint in the suit, quashed the order passed by the Munsiff Court and imposed cost of Rs.25,000/- on the appellant for payment in favour of the respondent-writ petitioner.
(3.)The only question which is required to be determined in this case is whether the High Court while exercising its power under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India is competent to set aside the plaint


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.