V. KALA BHARATHI Vs. ORIENTAL INS. CO. LTD.
LAWS(SC)-2014-4-2
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Decided on April 01,2014

V. Kala Bharathi And Ors Appellant
VERSUS
The Oriental Ins. Co. Ltd., Br. Chitoor Respondents





Cited Judgements :-

BRIJESH KUMAR VERMA VS. AURANGJEB & ANR [LAWS(DLH)-2018-5-673] [REFERRED TO]
PARSVNATH DEVELOPERS LIMITED VS. SUNITA RAHEJA [LAWS(NCD)-2023-5-88] [REFERRED TO]
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER & ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER VS. K.P.NATARAJAN [LAWS(MAD)-2016-10-19] [REFERRED TO]
CAPT (RETD ) O P SHARMA & ANR VS. KAMLA SHARMA & ORS [LAWS(DLH)-2008-3-387] [REFERRED]
ROYAL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY PVT LTD VS. NATIONAL PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION LTD (NPCC) [LAWS(DLH)-2018-9-266] [REFERRED TO]
H P STATE COOPERATIVE BANK LTD VS. UTTER PRADESH STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION [LAWS(HPH)-2015-7-9] [REFERRED TO]
ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. VS. DEVA BAI [LAWS(MPH)-2016-8-21] [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. ARVIND CONSTRUCTIONS (P) LIMITED [LAWS(APH)-2014-8-63] [REFERRED TO]
K. L. SUNEJA VS. DR. (MRS.) MANJEET KAUR MONGA [LAWS(SC)-2023-1-79] [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. JAYASWALS NECO LTD [LAWS(DLH)-2016-9-452] [REFERRED]
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY VS. KALA DEVI [LAWS(HPH)-2020-6-65] [REFERRED TO]
MANAGING DIRECTOR, M.P. STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPN., BHOPAL AND ANOTHER VS. SMT. SHASHI SWAMI & OTHERS [LAWS(MPH)-2018-8-467] [REFERRED TO]
M/S JAYASWALS NECO LTD. VS. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. [LAWS(DLH)-2016-8-81] [REFERRED TO]
CHITARANJAN NAROTTAMDAS NEGANDHI VS. HEMKALA [LAWS(BOM)-2016-6-131] [REFERRED TO]
UMEDRAJ JAIN VS. V.SUDARSANAN [LAWS(MAD)-2019-3-545] [REFERRED TO]
MANAGING DIRECTOR, M P STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPN, BHOPAL VS. SHASHI SWAMI & OTHERS [LAWS(MPH)-2018-8-130] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)The short question to be answered in this appeal is whether the amount deposited by the judgment debtor in a decree is to be adjusted first towards interest or towards principal decretal amount.
(2.)The facts of the case are On account of demise of an Engineering Graduate, Mr. V. Raja Kumar on 29.04.1993 in a road accident, his legal heirs, i.e., the appellants herein filed a claim petition being M.V.O.P. 774 of 1993 before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (for short, 'the Tribunal') claiming compensation to the tune of Rs.2 crores. The vehicle involved in the said accident was insured by the respondent Insurance Company. The Tribunal vide its Award dated 29.04.1997 awarded an amount of Rs.98,40,500/- as compensation with interest @ 12% p.a. from the date of the petition, i.e., 25.10.1993 till the date of realization, apart from costs quantified at Rs.99,443/-.
(3.)Being aggrieved, the respondent Insurance Company filed an appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short, 'the Act') and to comply with the provisions contained therein, deposited a sum of Rs.25,000/-. On 15.12.1997, the High Court in C.M.A. No. 1726 of 1997 granted stay of execution of the Award dated 29.04.1997 subject to the condition of depositing a sum of Rs.30 lakhs and Rs.99,443/- costs, which amounts were undisputedly deposited. The said order was made absolute on 15.07.1998 subject to the condition of depositing a further sum of Rs.30 lakhs, which was also complied with. A Division Bench of the High Court partly allowed the appeal on 19.12.2001 thereby reducing the compensation amount from Rs.98,40,500/- to Rs.56,40,000/- , however, the interest rate of 12% p.a. was retained. The respondent Insurance Company also deposited a sum of Rs.23,27,635/- on 19.09.2002, claiming to be full and final satisfaction of the award.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.